On Sun, 22 Mar 2020 15:49:51 -0400
Ted Felix wrote:
> Next question
>
> Why do you want/need JACK MIDI? (As with LV2 I may never get to it,
>but some justification will help focus the effort if I do.) Thanks.
>
>Ted.
One of the main claims of JACK MIDI is sample accurate
On 22/03/20 20:49, Ted Felix wrote:
Next question
Why do you want/need JACK MIDI? (As with LV2 I may never get to it,
but some justification will help focus the effort if I do.) Thanks.
For me a2j stuff has also worked well in situations where alsa-midi
wasn't supported.
As I
a2jmidid has been totally invisible for me. One checkbox in Studio Controls
(or a line in JACK settings). Need it between my old USB 8x8 MIDI Interface
and Reaper. If there are problems with a2jmidid, I'm sorry, I just haven't
seen it.
(People also say Linux Reaper is experimental and but after
Personally I don't see any reason to use jack MIDI. About the only piece of
software that I use that doesn't use alsa midi is Ardour, which is another
reason I don't really care for it. All qtractor, lmms, seq24, reaper, and even
bitwig Studio use alsa midi by default.
Justin A.K.A Demonic
Hi Ted, et. al.
JACK MIDI is essential for "talking" to wide range of software
synthesisers, e.g. the Bristol package (http://bristol.sourceforge.net/).
There are work arounds to its absence, such as a2jmidid
(https://github.com/linuxaudio/a2jmidid/), but those are a pain to use and
are very
Next question
Why do you want/need JACK MIDI? (As with LV2 I may never get to it,
but some justification will help focus the effort if I do.) Thanks.
Ted.
___
Rosegarden-user mailing list
Rosegarden-user@lists.sourceforge.net - use the
