Hi,
On 15/06/2016 21:14, Ted Felix wrote:
> On 06/15/2016 10:40 AM, Abrolag wrote:
>> On Mon, 16 May 2016 20:39:59 -0400
>> Ted Felix wrote:
>>> Try the latest with the bank and program checkboxes unchecked and let
>>> me know if this part is now fixed. It should be. If not, it should be
>>
On 06/15/2016 06:51 PM, Abrolag wrote:
> On the next startup, if I start Yoshimi first, Rosegarden connects and resets
> most of the controls to (now) wrong values. Changing bank root was a
> particular
> problem (now pretty much resolved) because it then meant Yoshimi was pointing
> to
> complet
On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 17:11:50 -0400
"D. Michael McIntyre" wrote:
> On 06/15/2016 03:14 PM, Ted Felix wrote:
>
> > Those are in the "Instrument Parameters" box on the left side.
>
> If they're missing, it's because you don't have any banks/programs
> defined in the studio.
>
> > The i
On 06/15/2016 03:14 PM, Ted Felix wrote:
> Those are in the "Instrument Parameters" box on the left side.
If they're missing, it's because you don't have any banks/programs
defined in the studio.
> The idea behind sending this stuff out is that Rosegarden is in
> control of bank/program
On 06/15/2016 10:40 AM, Abrolag wrote:
> On Mon, 16 May 2016 20:39:59 -0400
> Ted Felix wrote:
>> Try the latest with the bank and program checkboxes unchecked and let
>> me know if this part is now fixed. It should be. If not, it should be
>> easy to fix.
> Decided to have a look at this an
On Mon, 16 May 2016 20:39:59 -0400
Ted Felix wrote:
> On 05/16/2016 04:25 PM, Lorenzo Sutton wrote:
> > No wait! I still want to be able to mess with volume and controllers
> > (knobs in tracks and automation in the matrix).
> > What I would like to exclude is sending them when the file *loads*,
On Mon, 16 May 2016 20:39:59 -0400
Ted Felix wrote:
> On 05/16/2016 04:25 PM, Lorenzo Sutton wrote:
> > No wait! I still want to be able to mess with volume and controllers
> > (knobs in tracks and automation in the matrix).
> > What I would like to exclude is sending them when the file *loads*,
On 05/16/2016 04:25 PM, Lorenzo Sutton wrote:
> No wait! I still want to be able to mess with volume and controllers
> (knobs in tracks and automation in the matrix).
> What I would like to exclude is sending them when the file *loads*,
Ok. I'll have to think some more about that. It's probab
On 16/05/16 22:10, Ted Felix wrote:
> On 05/16/2016 09:44 AM, Lorenzo Sutton wrote:
>> Hi Ted, what do you mean with controllers removed? You mean explicitly
>> removing them from the device set-up? This (I think) would disable use
>> of controller rulers (as reverse to adding controllers which ena
On 05/16/2016 09:44 AM, Lorenzo Sutton wrote:
> Hi Ted, what do you mean with controllers removed? You mean explicitly
> removing them from the device set-up? This (I think) would disable use
> of controller rulers (as reverse to adding controllers which enables
> rulers) and that would be rather i
On 16/05/2016 14:41, Ted Felix wrote:
> On 05/13/2016 07:54 AM, Lorenzo Sutton wrote:
>> it would be nice to have an option to not
>> send anything upon file load / playback
>
> We should be closer to this now. Using a device with the controllers
> removed and unchecking the Bank/Program check
On 05/13/2016 07:54 AM, Lorenzo Sutton wrote:
> it would be nice to have an option to not
> send anything upon file load / playback
We should be closer to this now. Using a device with the controllers
removed and unchecking the Bank/Program checkboxes should result in
nothing going out. Try
On 13/05/2016 13:18, Ted Felix wrote:
> On 05/13/2016 06:06 AM, Lorenzo Sutton wrote:
>> Does this solve the problem where if I open yoshimi (or it is already
>> opened) and load a state file *before* opening file in rosegarden,
>> rosegarden will fire a set of program changes which effectively m
On 05/13/2016 06:06 AM, Lorenzo Sutton wrote:
> Does this solve the problem where if I open yoshimi (or it is already
> opened) and load a state file *before* opening file in rosegarden,
> rosegarden will fire a set of program changes which effectively mangle
> my yoshimi state?
Probably not.
On 13/05/2016 10:52, Abrolag wrote:
> On Thu, 12 May 2016 07:32:18 +0100
> Abrolag wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 11 May 2016 19:12:40 -0400
>> Ted Felix wrote:
>>
>>> On 05/04/2016 04:40 PM, Abrolag wrote:
Thanks Ted. I do appreciate that these things aren't as easy as they look
:(
>>>
>>>L
On Thu, 12 May 2016 07:32:18 +0100
Abrolag wrote:
> On Wed, 11 May 2016 19:12:40 -0400
> Ted Felix wrote:
>
> > On 05/04/2016 04:40 PM, Abrolag wrote:
> > > Thanks Ted. I do appreciate that these things aren't as easy as they look
> > > :(
> >
> >Looks like bug #1516 might be fixed
On Wed, 11 May 2016 19:12:40 -0400
Ted Felix wrote:
> On 05/04/2016 04:40 PM, Abrolag wrote:
> > Thanks Ted. I do appreciate that these things aren't as easy as they look
> > :(
>
>Looks like bug #1516 might be fixed now. Grab the latest svn and
> give it a whirl.
>
> https://sourcefor
On 05/04/2016 04:40 PM, Abrolag wrote:
> Thanks Ted. I do appreciate that these things aren't as easy as they look :(
Looks like bug #1516 might be fixed now. Grab the latest svn and
give it a whirl.
https://sourceforge.net/p/rosegarden/bugs/1516/
Ted.
-
On Wed, 4 May 2016 15:21:17 -0400
Ted Felix wrote:
> On 05/04/2016 01:35 PM, Abrolag wrote:
> >> https://sourceforge.net/p/rosegarden/bugs/1516/
> > Any chance of some progress on this. I've just tried build 14635 and the
> > problem is still there. I've actually reverted to 14235 on my DAW :(
On 05/04/2016 01:35 PM, Abrolag wrote:
>> https://sourceforge.net/p/rosegarden/bugs/1516/
> Any chance of some progress on this. I've just tried build 14635 and the
> problem is still there. I've actually reverted to 14235 on my DAW :(
Should have a fix in a week or two. This is proving to be
On Sat, 26 Mar 2016 17:09:29 -0400
"D. Michael McIntyre" wrote:
> On 03/26/2016 03:25 PM, Abrolag wrote:
>
> > This seems quite wrong to me, and caused me a lot of trouble until I had a
> > track with changes that were big enough for me to notice the fader move
> > significantly.
>
> https://
On 03/26/2016 03:25 PM, Abrolag wrote:
> This seems quite wrong to me, and caused me a lot of trouble until I had a
> track with changes that were big enough for me to notice the fader move
> significantly.
https://sourceforge.net/p/rosegarden/bugs/1516/
I'll come down on the side of bug, but I'
I suspect the former :(
The way to demonstrate it is:
Start a segment on (say) track one, record a bit then stop.
Go into the Event List Editor and put in a volume change near the start.
Start another segment on the same track after the end of the first one and
record on that.
Playback, without
23 matches
Mail list logo
