Re: [Rosegarden-user] Invisible rosegarden

2012-02-06 Thread david
On 02/05/2012 05:30 PM, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: > On Sunday, February 05, 2012, Tim Rue wrote: > >> That workaround does not work for me. And I only have the problem after a >> restart of the OS Ubuntu 10.10... > > I still can't find any reason why the stock, off-the-shelf code I used should > m

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Invisible rosegarden

2012-02-05 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Sunday, February 05, 2012, Tim Rue wrote: > That workaround does not work for me. And I only have the problem after a > restart of the OS Ubuntu 10.10... I still can't find any reason why the stock, off-the-shelf code I used should misbehave in this fashion. I have no doubt that the problems

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Invisible rosegarden

2012-02-05 Thread Tim Rue
sdsm933 writes: > > D. Michael McIntyre writes: > > > > > On Monday, November 21, 2011, sdsm933 wrote: > > > > > I discovered that if you always "unmaximize" Rosegarden before you quit, > > > the Rosegarden.conf will reflect your config changes, and also the gui > > > will be visible the nex

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Invisible rosegarden

2011-11-21 Thread sdsm933
D. Michael McIntyre writes: > > On Monday, November 21, 2011, sdsm933 wrote: > > > I discovered that if you always "unmaximize" Rosegarden before you quit, > > the Rosegarden.conf will reflect your config changes, and also the gui > > will be visible the next time you start. > > I just don't

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Invisible rosegarden

2011-11-21 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Monday, November 21, 2011, sdsm933 wrote: > I discovered that if you always "unmaximize" Rosegarden before you quit, > the Rosegarden.conf will reflect your config changes, and also the gui > will be visible the next time you start. More problems basically having to do with the store/restore w

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Invisible rosegarden

2011-11-21 Thread sdsm933
D. Michael McIntyre writes: > > On Wednesday, June 15, 2011, Manuela Hutter wrote: > > > Here's the faulty config file, in case you're interested: > > I was interested enough to glance through it, but I don't see anything really > obviously out of line here. > > Oh well, at least whatever th

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Invisible rosegarden

2011-06-15 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Wednesday, June 15, 2011, Manuela Hutter wrote: > Here's the faulty config file, in case you're interested: I was interested enough to glance through it, but I don't see anything really obviously out of line here. Oh well, at least whatever this was yielded to a simple remedy. It's the best

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Invisible rosegarden

2011-06-14 Thread Manuela Hutter
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 8:39 AM, D. Michael McIntyre wrote: > On Monday, June 13, 2011, Manuela Hutter wrote: > >> know that it's there though (and not frozen), because by hovering >> certain invisible elements I can get their tooltips. > > My first thought on that was that perhaps something was g

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Invisible rosegarden

2011-06-13 Thread D. Michael McIntyre
On Monday, June 13, 2011, Manuela Hutter wrote: > know that it's there though (and not frozen), because by hovering > certain invisible elements I can get their tooltips. My first thought on that was that perhaps something was going wrong with the stylesheet, and I was going to suggest that you

Re: [Rosegarden-user] Invisible rosegarden

2011-06-13 Thread Vladimir Savic
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 00:26 +0200, Manuela Hutter wrote: > Hey there, > > I just installed Rosegarden (11.06) on Ubuntu 11.04 today and gave it > a shot. At some point it behaved weirdly, got rendering issues, which > I "solved" by closing each single window/view, and finally killing the > whole p

[Rosegarden-user] Invisible rosegarden

2011-06-13 Thread Manuela Hutter
Hey there, I just installed Rosegarden (11.06) on Ubuntu 11.04 today and gave it a shot. At some point it behaved weirdly, got rendering issues, which I "solved" by closing each single window/view, and finally killing the whole program. Unfortunately, I didn't pay too close attention to what I did