' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 29 March, 2002 02:01 PM
Subject: RE: Payers sure do like proprietary provider IDs! Do providers
feel the same way?
William:
I agree that the lack of standard Provider IDs is a problem. However, if
the suggestion is that the industry ought to embrace the DUNS
. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'William J. Kammerer ' [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'WEDi/SNIP ID Routing '
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 1:01 PM
Subject: RE: Payers sure do like proprietary provider IDs! Do providers feel the
same way?
William:
I agree that the lack of standard Provider IDs
The ISA receiver ID is defined as follows in the IG:
Identification code published by the receiver of the data; When sending,
it is used by the sender as their sending ID, thus other parties sending to
them will use this as a receiving ID to route data to them
The definition seems to imply
Routing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 27 March, 2002 10:52 PM
Subject: Re: Payers sure do like proprietary provider IDs! Do providers
feel the same way?
William,
I did a little poking around on http://sbs.dnb.com/default.asp and I see
that Christopher J. Feahr, OD is listed in DB''s database
) 941-2240
-Original Message-
From: William J. Kammerer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 5:44 PM
To: WEDi/SNIP ID Routing
Subject: Re: Payers sure do like proprietary provider IDs! Do providers
feel the same way?
Ken:
Your comments are very helpful - thanks
PROTECTED]; WEDi/SNIP ID
Routing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 27 March, 2002 10:52 PM
Subject: Re: Payers sure do like proprietary provider IDs! Do providers
feel the same way?
William,
I did a little poking around on http://sbs.dnb.com/default.asp and I see
that Christopher J. Feahr, OD is listed
; 'WEDi/SNIP ID Routing'
Subject: RE: Payers sure do like proprietary provider IDs! Do providers
feel the same way?
Dave,
I think I did see a little discussion of the DINS+4, but it strikes me
as
a partially de-standardized standard intended to accomplish what you
could also do by requesting
Bill:
I can't speak for the other payors, but our Plan has been eager to see a
national provider ID for some time now.
We use multiple proprietary IDs and have wanted to consolidate onto one
new number -- we even had a project to modify the provider ID fields in
all of our systems.
. Kammerer
Novannet, LLC.
+1 (614) 487-0320
- Original Message -
From: Fody, Kenneth W. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WEDi/SNIP ID Routing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 27 March, 2002 11:03 AM
Subject: RE: Payers sure do like proprietary provider IDs! Do providers
feel the same way?
Bill:
I can't
