Re: [routing-wg] Fwd: [bcop] Abstract of the MANRS BCOP

On 17/05/2018 17:02, Benno Overeinder wrote: Maybe I'm missing it when reading the website and the BCOP but where does it state to *not *allow /25 or more specifics? The entire reason for MANRS is to prevent route hijacking.  An ISP that allows /25s or /26s to be leaked will easily circumvent all

Re: [routing-wg] ROAs and route objects and filters

Sorry, saw this as I hit send: > There was a discussion in the routing wg on Monday plenary session, not routing wg. > On May 17, 2018, at 5:09 PM, Sandra Murphy wrote: > > There was a discussion in the routing wg on Monday of converting ROAs into > IRR route objects for