Thank you all for the discussion and feedback.
>From the email thread we conclude there are no principal objections and
close the LC.
Best regards,
Jan Zorz & Benno Overeinder
On 29/05/2018 15:12, Job Snijders wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 09:03:48AM +0300, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
>> On 28/0
On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 09:03:48AM +0300, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> On 28/05/2018 14:53, Job Snijders wrote:
> > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 07:16:34PM +0300, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> >> On 17/05/2018 17:02, Benno Overeinder wrote:
> >>
> >> Maybe I'm missing it when reading the website and the BCOP but
> On 28/05/2018 14:53, Job Snijders wrote:
>> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 07:16:34PM +0300, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
>>> On 17/05/2018 17:02, Benno Overeinder wrote:
>>>
>>> Maybe I'm missing it when reading the website and the BCOP but where
>>> does it state to *not *allow /25 or more specifics?
>> If
On 28/05/2018 14:53, Job Snijders wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 07:16:34PM +0300, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
>> On 17/05/2018 17:02, Benno Overeinder wrote:
>>
>> Maybe I'm missing it when reading the website and the BCOP but where
>> does it state to *not *allow /25 or more specifics?
> If someone
> If someone registers a /25, and announces it, and the RPKI ROA allows
> it, then what is the problem? :-)
with ipv4 run-out, this day will come
ExterNetworks Inc. is a http://www.extnoc.com/";
target="_blank">managed it service providers since 2001. We provide
End-to-end solutions featuring Design, Deployment and 24/7 IT support.
Battle-tested and performance-proven professionals down the street and around
the world give us capacity t
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 07:16:34PM +0300, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> On 17/05/2018 17:02, Benno Overeinder wrote:
>
> Maybe I'm missing it when reading the website and the BCOP but where
> does it state to *not *allow /25 or more specifics?
If someone registers a /25, and announces it, and the RPKI
On 17/05/2018 17:02, Benno Overeinder wrote:
Maybe I'm missing it when reading the website and the BCOP but where
does it state to *not *allow /25 or more specifics?
The entire reason for MANRS is to prevent route hijacking. An ISP that
allows /25s or /26s to be leaked will easily circumvent all
