Jim Redman wrote:
> Dan,
>
> On 2002.02.27 11:10:10 -0700 Daniel Rall wrote:
>
>> Jim Redman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > I have no idea - I don't use the XmlRpcClient directly, only the Lite
>> > so I don't know the behavior of the XmlRpcClient in this case.
>>
>> public class XmlRpcClien
Dan,
On 2002.02.27 11:10:10 -0700 Daniel Rall wrote:
> Jim Redman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I have no idea - I don't use the XmlRpcClient directly, only the Lite
> > so I don't know the behavior of the XmlRpcClient in this case.
>
> public class XmlRpcClientLite
> extends XmlRpcClie
Jim,
I just committed a fix for the problem to CVS. The solution I used is
slightly different from yours: Instead of the whole LiteWorker.execute()
method, only the sending of the request and the parsing of the response
headers are put into a try-retry wrapper. Otherwise, we'd retry to call
t
Jim Redman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have no idea - I don't use the XmlRpcClient directly, only the Lite
> so I don't know the behavior of the XmlRpcClient in this case.
public class XmlRpcClientLite
extends XmlRpcClient
On 2002.02.27 08:43:34 -0700 Hannes Wallnöfer wrote:
> Thanks Jim. One problem I see with your solution is that it retries on
> *every* exception, which is not what we want (or do we?). I'll give it a
> try.
I'm not sure that there is sufficient information at this point to
determine whether
Thanks Jim. One problem I see with your solution is that it retries on
*every* exception, which is not what we want (or do we?). I'll give it a
try.
Hannes
Jim Redman wrote:
>
> The code in the exception clause of:
>
> public void write (byte[] request) throws IOException
>
> in XmlR
Jim Redman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The code in the exception clause of:
>
> public void write (byte[] request) throws IOException
>
> in XmlRpcClientLite does not seem to be effective in handling
> keep-alive timeouts. The solution that works for me is to repeat the
> call to:
>
>
