Andrew Evers wrote:
I've just had a look, and the commons-logging package is 26K, or 18K
for the '-api' version (that includes all we need in applets). OTOH,
the classes I mentioned total to 6K. Even allowing another 3K for
the cut-down loader solution I proposed and you still only reach
half the
> I am almost convinced. I am unfamiliar with the functional
> requirements of an applet developer for our library, but I will accept
> at face value that an 80% increase in the file size of our applet jar
> is unacceptable.
> My concerns would be that the Commons Logging group already put plent
Redwood wrote:
I would like to have the system property as it allows the XML-RPC library
to be debugged at the end-user site without the embedding application having to do anything. The case I had yesterday, I hadn't embedded any specific debugging code and I wanted to use the XML-RPC library deb
- Original Message -
From: "Ryan Hoegg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 4:13 PM
Subject: Re: Logging API
> Making a new thread, this was buried in the replies to a Bugzilla
> message. :)
Yeah, I tend to reply to
Hey Andrew,
Making a new thread, this was buried in the replies to a Bugzilla
message. :)
We started some discussions about using the Commons Logging package late
last year. I think we decided to go forward with it as the size of the
JARs we would need to include was small.
Why do we need th
