Re: The organization of xml.apache.org

2002-12-03 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Sam Ruby wrote: > > Hi, I didn't reply to the whole list of lists to which this was posted, > > but I wanted to see if anyone in the XML-RPC project has a better angle > > on this than I do. > > > > What does this all mean in English? This seems to be the tail end of a > > l

Re: The organization of xml.apache.org

2002-12-03 Thread Ryan Hoegg
Andrew C. Oliver wrote: What I like most about such a proposal is that it is completely up to the commiters to decide whether they want opt in or opt out. What do others think? It continues to sound reasonable to me, but I'd personally like to see the Jakarta "brand" continue. Not sure how t

Re: The organization of xml.apache.org

2002-12-03 Thread Matt Sergeant
Please note that axkit's core dev list is [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note the extra "el" :-). I've had to forward all mails so far, so if you could all change follow ups that would be great.

Re: The organization of xml.apache.org

2002-12-03 Thread Andrew C. Oliver
What I like most about such a proposal is that it is completely up to the commiters to decide whether they want opt in or opt out. What do others think? It continues to sound reasonable to me, but I'd personally like to see the Jakarta "brand" continue. Not sure how to *do* that... I don't

Re: The organization of xml.apache.org

2002-12-03 Thread Steven Noels
[suggestion to hold this discussion only on [EMAIL PROTECTED] from now?] Sam Ruby wrote: > Separate code bases with separate communities should be separate > projects. Independent of the size of the codebase, if the size of > the community is only a few people, then it is not an ASF project.

Re: The organization of xml.apache.org

2002-12-02 Thread Sam Ruby
Ryan Hoegg wrote: Ryan Hoegg wrote: Hi, I didn't reply to the whole list of lists to which this was posted, but I wanted to see if anyone in the XML-RPC project has a better angle on this than I do. What does this all mean in English? This seems to be the tail end of a long thread from some

Re: The organization of xml.apache.org

2002-12-02 Thread Ryan Hoegg
Hi, I didn't reply to the whole list of lists to which this was posted, but I wanted to see if anyone in the XML-RPC project has a better angle on this than I do. What does this all mean in English? This seems to be the tail end of a long thread from some other list. How is this going to affe

Re: The organization of xml.apache.org

2002-12-02 Thread Sam Ruby
Ted Leung wrote: 4. Some option that hasn't been thought of yet. Based initially on the reorg discussions, and then a number of F2F discussions at ApacheCon, I am planning on proposing something radical within Jakarta, but it applies equally well here. I provided some foreshadowing for this