Hi,
the DateFormat used in the DateTool is supporting only a subset of ISO
8601 date/times. In particular time zones are missing, likewise one must
not use milliseconds.
I suggest using the class XsDateTimeFormat from ws-jaxme instead, which
is a thread safe instance of Format. The only
Aux environs du 16/06/04 à 18:49 -0700, sous le titre Re: [PATCH]
remove deprecated call in WebServer.java, Daniel Rall prit sa plus
belle plume pour écrire les mots suivants:
Thanks, committed in CVS rev 1.26.
Daniel, while you're at it, would you mind committing my 1 year old
patch about a
On Do, 2004-06-17 at 09:36, John Wilson wrote:
The XML-RPC spec (http://www.xml-rpc.com/spec see the last but one
bullet point) says that timezones may not be present in a date. The
generally accepted interpretation of the spec is that only the precise
subset of ISO 8601 date/times given
On 17 Jun 2004, at 09:20, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
On Do, 2004-06-17 at 09:36, John Wilson wrote:
The XML-RPC spec (http://www.xml-rpc.com/spec see the last but one
bullet point) says that timezones may not be present in a date. The
generally accepted interpretation of the spec is that only the
On Do, 2004-06-17 at 10:24, John Wilson wrote:
The example in the spec does not include milliseconds - the generally
accepted interpretation of the spec (i.e. by XML-RPC implementers) is
that they are not permitted.
If so, that leaves still more room for vendor extensions ... :-)
On 17 Jun 2004, at 09:40, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
On Do, 2004-06-17 at 10:24, John Wilson wrote:
The example in the spec does not include milliseconds - the generally
accepted interpretation of the spec (i.e. by XML-RPC implementers) is
that they are not permitted.
If so, that leaves still more
Hi folks,
About 3 weeks ago I posted about a problem with Apache XML-RPC encoding
Doubles using scientific notation, which does not conform to the spec,
but I didn't see any response.
I don't want to keep pestering you if I'm in the wrong place. Can you
let me know where I should be reporting
Apache XML-RPC (or at least Helma XML-RPC which became Apache) used to
implement null. It was removed at the request of the author of the
spec (Dave Winer). I do not believe that this should be reintroduced.
John Wilson
The Wilson Partnership
http://www.wilson.co.uk
On Do, 2004-06-17 at 11:59, John Wilson wrote:
Apache XML-RPC (or at least Helma XML-RPC which became Apache) used to
implement null. It was removed at the request of the author of the
spec (Dave Winer). I do not believe that this should be reintroduced.
If so, how do you explain
On 17 Jun 2004, at 11:20, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
On Do, 2004-06-17 at 11:59, John Wilson wrote:
Apache XML-RPC (or at least Helma XML-RPC which became Apache) used to
implement null. It was removed at the request of the author of the
spec (Dave Winer). I do not believe that this should be
On Do, 2004-06-17 at 12:35, John Wilson wrote:
MinML-RPC is a minimal XML-RPC implementation. This is very
interesting, but I have some pushback. There is no such thing as the
nil/ extension. If we added it, it would break at least one
implementation. Please appreciate the bigger picture.
On 17 Jun 2004, at 12:00, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
On Do, 2004-06-17 at 12:35, John Wilson wrote:
MinML-RPC is a minimal XML-RPC implementation. This is very
interesting, but I have some pushback. There is no such thing as the
nil/ extension. If we added it, it would break at least one
12 matches
Mail list logo
