Cruising my bugs upstream (I file them, and advance them in
front of the Fedorian borg's autocloser to amuse myself, and
not with much expectation of resolution) I just got the
semi-annual set of proposed auto-closes of neglected bugs, and
am re-verifying and advancing them today
One is
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Jeff Johnson n3...@mac.com wrote:
BTW, there's a modest fix in rpm-5.3 HEAD to get
rid of the pesky uuid_t typedef in unistd.h on Mac Os X.
Wasn't hard, just annoying.
Dunno whether I pushed the fix (I've forgotten) to rpm-5_2.
Perhaps this ?
git show
On Nov 4, 2010, at 10:28 AM, devzero2000 wrote:
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Jeff Johnson n3...@mac.com wrote:
BTW, there's a modest fix in rpm-5.3 HEAD to get
rid of the pesky uuid_t typedef in unistd.h on Mac Os X.
Wasn't hard, just annoying.
Dunno whether I pushed the fix (I've
On Nov 4, 2010, at 10:13 AM, R P Herrold wrote:
Cruising my bugs upstream (I file them, and advance them in front of the
Fedorian borg's autocloser to amuse myself, and not with much expectation of
resolution) I just got the semi-annual set of proposed auto-closes of
neglected bugs,
On Thursday, 04 November 2010, at 10:13:09 (-0400),
R P Herrold wrote:
What are the team's thoughts to suggest here?
Fix the package that erroneously assumes that lack of $DISPLAY
implies lack of Tk for build.
Michael
--
Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ m...@kainx.org
On Nov 4, 2010, at 12:56 PM, Michael Jennings wrote:
On Thursday, 04 November 2010, at 10:13:09 (-0400),
R P Herrold wrote:
What are the team's thoughts to suggest here?
Fix the package that erroneously assumes that lack of $DISPLAY
implies lack of Tk for build.
That is often (but
On Thu, 4 Nov 2010, Michael Jennings wrote:
On Thursday, 04 November 2010, at 10:13:09 (-0400),
Fix the package that erroneously assumes that lack of $DISPLAY
implies lack of Tk for build.
I did not give enough context -- I did a run of several
hundred R ad-on packagings, and several need
