Re: [Rpm-ecosystem] Sync of rpm macros between Fedora/openSUSE

On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > This moves those macros under the maintenance of the rpm team. > I guess this could work for a few projects, let's say perl and python, > but I don't see how this can scale (to perl, python, java, js, lisp,

Re: [Rpm-ecosystem] Sync of rpm macros between Fedora/openSUSE

Orion Poplawski píše v Po 11. 04. 2016 v 09:11 -0600: > On 04/11/2016 07:46 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 01:45:15PM +0200, Tomas Chvatal wrote: > > > > > > Atm most of the macros are stored together with the packages they > > > are > > >

Re: [Rpm-ecosystem] Sync of rpm macros between Fedora/openSUSE

Hi, On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 01:45:15PM +0200, Tomas Chvatal wrote: > Atm most of the macros are stored together with the packages they are > used for (kde macros in kde, systemd in systemd, python in python, etc > etc). ...and that sounds just right. Macros should evolve along with their

Re: [Rpm-ecosystem] rpm -q --whatrequires and rich deps

On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 12:53:35PM +0200, Michael Mraka wrote: > So to make things consistent I'd propose to fix > rpm -q --whatrequires H > which currently returns "none". And fix --whatsuggests, --whatrecommends, etc. > to work the same way. Wait, don't make "rpm -q --whatrequires H" return

Re: [Rpm-ecosystem] rpm -q --whatrequires and rich deps

Thank you guys for your responses. Not surprisingly - different people, different expectations :). Miroslav Suchy wrote: % In rpm I would like to have semantic "which package will stop working if I remove this package". % I.e. when I run: % rpm -e foo % then I will get some errors that foo