Re: [Rpm-maint] [PATCH] Add RPMTAG_IDENTITY calculation as tag extension

On 04/05/2018 03:42 PM, Vladimir D. Seleznev wrote: On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 11:41:33AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: On 04/03/2018 10:31 PM, Vladimir D. Seleznev wrote: RPMTAG_IDENTITY is calculating as digest of part of package header that does not contain irrelevant to package build tag

Re: [Rpm-maint] [PATCH] Add RPMTAG_IDENTITY calculation as tag extension

> On Apr 5, 2018, at 4:41 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote: > >> On 04/03/2018 10:31 PM, Vladimir D. Seleznev wrote: >> RPMTAG_IDENTITY is calculating as digest of part of package header that >> does not contain irrelevant to package build tag entries. >> Mathematically

Re: [Rpm-maint] [PATCH] Add RPMTAG_IDENTITY calculation as tag extension

> On Apr 5, 2018, at 2:12 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote: > >> On 04/04/2018 05:32 PM, Vladimir D. Seleznev wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 09:18:35AM -0400, Jeff Johnson wrote: >>> >>> On Apr 4, 2018, at 5:47 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [PATCH 1/2] Allow adding tag RPMTAG_AUTOINSTALLED to headers of package being installed

Sent from my iPad > On Apr 4, 2018, at 9:25 AM, Aleksei Nikiforov > wrote: > > Hi > > Since patch 2 is no longer needed, could you please provide a feedback about > patch 1? It'd be great if this patch could be merged. > I can try ... The patch seems (from

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add armv8* arch variants to rpmrc.in (#425)

If you wish to move to "human readable" names, then the specific functionalities tied to arch in rpmrc need to be separately configured. There's only a few critical values that rpmrc provides a default for * (per-arch) optflags (like in this issue) * (global) macrofiles search patterns and the

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add armv8* arch variants to rpmrc.in (#425)

@berolinux Just to be clear, I -have- a customer who has asked for armv8 WITHOUT NEON/VFP. This was obviously in the embedded space, but the same customer is saying that it's not for compatibility, but is actually a 32-bit 'armv8' processor. (No 64-bit support..) I have no idea if those

Re: [Rpm-maint] [PATCH] Add RPMTAG_IDENTITY calculation as tag extension

On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 03:42:15PM +0300, Vladimir D. Seleznev wrote: > On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 11:41:33AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > On 04/03/2018 10:31 PM, Vladimir D. Seleznev wrote: > > > RPMTAG_IDENTITY is calculating as digest of part of package header that > > > does not contain

Re: [Rpm-maint] [PATCH] Add RPMTAG_IDENTITY calculation as tag extension

On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 11:41:33AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: > On 04/03/2018 10:31 PM, Vladimir D. Seleznev wrote: > > RPMTAG_IDENTITY is calculating as digest of part of package header that > > does not contain irrelevant to package build tag entries. > > > > Mathematically RPMTAG_IDENTITY

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add armv8* arch variants to rpmrc.in (#425)

@mlschroe aarch64 and armv8 are the same CPU, but (obviously, given one is 32bit and one is 64bit) a different ABI -- no need to carry over the legacy float ABI. For neon, all aarch64 CPUs made so far have it, and it is part of the aarch64 core - however, ARM's docs say "Both floating-point

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add armv8* arch variants to rpmrc.in (#425)

Pardon the dumb question, but if armv8 is just the 32bit mode of aarch64 why doesn't aarch64 also need those float/neon/crypto modifiers? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [PATCH] Add RPMTAG_IDENTITY calculation as tag extension

On 04/03/2018 10:31 PM, Vladimir D. Seleznev wrote: RPMTAG_IDENTITY is calculating as digest of part of package header that does not contain irrelevant to package build tag entries. Mathematically RPMTAG_IDENTITY value is a result of function of two variable: a package header and an rpm

Re: [Rpm-maint] [PATCH] Add RPMTAG_IDENTITY calculation as tag extension

On 04/04/2018 05:32 PM, Vladimir D. Seleznev wrote: On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 09:18:35AM -0400, Jeff Johnson wrote: On Apr 4, 2018, at 5:47 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote: On 04/04/2018 11:01 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote: [...] +static int identityTag(Header h, rpmtd td,