#913 was merged into 4.16 and 4.17. I think this fix should be backported to
these branches.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
OCaml cmxs files are static libraries, which can be loaded at runtime
via the Dynlink module. They apparently do not provide any useful
runtime dependency information to be stored into the packages
Provides/Requires list. Therefore just skip them.
Adjust attr, remove extension and ELF magic
@teythoon commented on this pull request.
> @@ -503,6 +500,9 @@ static int pgpPrtSubType(const uint8_t *h, size_t hlen,
> pgpSigType sigtype,
case PGPSUBTYPE_REVOKE_REASON:
case PGPSUBTYPE_FEATURES:
case PGPSUBTYPE_EMBEDDED_SIG:
+ pgpPrtHex("", p+1, plen-1);
+
@DemiMarie commented on this pull request.
> @@ -503,6 +500,9 @@ static int pgpPrtSubType(const uint8_t *h, size_t hlen,
> pgpSigType sigtype,
case PGPSUBTYPE_REVOKE_REASON:
case PGPSUBTYPE_FEATURES:
case PGPSUBTYPE_EMBEDDED_SIG:
+ pgpPrtHex("", p+1, plen-1);
@pmatilai commented on this pull request.
> @@ -503,6 +500,9 @@ static int pgpPrtSubType(const uint8_t *h, size_t hlen,
> pgpSigType sigtype,
case PGPSUBTYPE_REVOKE_REASON:
case PGPSUBTYPE_FEATURES:
case PGPSUBTYPE_EMBEDDED_SIG:
+ pgpPrtHex("", p+1, plen-1);
+
@teythoon pushed 1 commit.
1780fbe2286b309f8bdc24728731f2e28603 Fix handling of signature notations
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
@mlschroe commented on this pull request.
> @@ -422,8 +422,6 @@ static int pgpVerifySigEDDSA(pgpDigAlg pgpkey, pgpDigAlg
> pgpsig, uint8_t *hash,
return rc;
if (pgpkey->curve != PGPCURVE_ED25519)
return rc;
-if (hash_algo != PGPHASHALGO_SHA256)
- return rc;
I
Merged #1797 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1797#event-5526192081___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Very well then :coffin:
(how come the emojis are always missing just the thing I want: scythe, grim
reaper, chainsaw... it's not that much to ask is it?)
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
No objections from my side. Take it out into the back garden and end its
suffering...
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1813
-- Commit Summary --
* https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1813/commits/5d7965a23779321ba2e8820e1859507f03e0e152;>Fix
signature subpacket type handling
@mlschroe - thoughts, opinions?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1797#issuecomment-952690200___
Rpm-maint mailing
Yeah these details were forgotten so many times that I seem to have learned
something from it :laughing:
Thanks!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Merged #1811 into master.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/1811#event-5525871712___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Justus Winter writes:
> Panu Matilainen writes:
>
>> Decoupling the implementation from the API would be beneficial to rpm in
>> any case because
>> a) it'd also enable implementing support for other libraries as well (eg
>> RNP which is much closer in language family) and as long as the
15 matches
Mail list logo
