@pmatilai commented on this pull request.
> @@ -542,6 +542,12 @@ Supplements: (%{name} = %{version}-%{release} and
> langpacks-%{1})\
# Use internal dependency generator rather than external helpers?
%_use_internal_dependency_generator1
+#
+# Generate minimum versions for ELF
Merged #2379 into master.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/2379#event-8444504213
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint
> No, that commit is not the problem, it's just the messenger.
>
> See #1382
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/commit/b34333fa021c0ee7215714eeef96d1a2843ea08e
changed the default behavior. Now users running `rpmbuild -ba *spec` will
automatically remove the build directory, so
@gordonmessmer commented on this pull request.
> + * a copy of the version number.
+ */
+static char *getLibtoolVer(const char *filename)
+{
+const char *so;
+char dest[PATH_MAX];
+int destsize = 0;
+int found_digit = 0, found_dot = 0;
+
+destsize = readlink(filename, dest,
@pmatilai commented on this pull request.
> + * a copy of the version number.
+ */
+static char *getLibtoolVer(const char *filename)
+{
+const char *so;
+char dest[PATH_MAX];
+int destsize = 0;
+int found_digit = 0, found_dot = 0;
+
+destsize = readlink(filename, dest,
@pmatilai commented on this pull request.
> +/*
+ * Rather than re-implement path searching for shared objects, use
+ * dlmopen(). This will still perform initialization and finalization
+ * functions, which isn't necessarily safe, so do that in a separate
+ * process.
+ */
+static char
@gordonmessmer commented on this pull request.
> +/*
+ * Rather than re-implement path searching for shared objects, use
+ * dlmopen(). This will still perform initialization and finalization
+ * functions, which isn't necessarily safe, so do that in a separate
+ * process.
+ */
+static char
@pmatilai commented on this pull request.
> +/*
+ * Rather than re-implement path searching for shared objects, use
+ * dlmopen(). This will still perform initialization and finalization
+ * functions, which isn't necessarily safe, so do that in a separate
+ * process.
+ */
+static char
@gordonmessmer commented on this pull request.
> +/*
+ * Rather than re-implement path searching for shared objects, use
+ * dlmopen(). This will still perform initialization and finalization
+ * functions, which isn't necessarily safe, so do that in a separate
+ * process.
+ */
+static char
@pmatilai commented on this pull request.
> +/*
+ * Rather than re-implement path searching for shared objects, use
+ * dlmopen(). This will still perform initialization and finalization
+ * functions, which isn't necessarily safe, so do that in a separate
+ * process.
+ */
+static char
Closed #2380 as completed.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2380#event-8443809541
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID:
___
Rpm-maint
No, that commit is not the problem, it's just the messenger.
See https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1382
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2380#issuecomment-1418551808
You are receiving this because
It is confirmed that this problem is caused by
b34333fa021c0ee7215714eeef96d1a2843ea08e.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/2380#issuecomment-1418443920
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
When Non-privileged user was used to build the "rpm" package, the file deletion
failed during the final rmbuild cleanup phase. The problem is caused by the
lack of write permission on the testing directory.
```
...
[ 209s] Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files
14 matches
Mail list logo
