Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Extend %changelog to accept filename. (#393)
Actually, if ```%include``` automatically included the referenced file into SRPM, that would be helpful as well. I realize, that the path could be arbitrary, but if there was restriction, that could work ... -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/393#issuecomment-364985530___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
[Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Extend %changelog to accept filename. (#393)
Currently, the changelog entries can be either listed in a .spec file or they could be included by ```%include``` directive. However, usage of the ```%include``` has one major downside, that the included file must be explicitly listed as one of sources, otherwise the file would not be available for build from SRPM. Would it be possible to extend the ```%changelog``` section, so it would accept ```-f``` parameter with filename. If that file was available, it would do two things: 1. Liste the content of that file as changelog 2. Include that file in generated SRPM That would give a way to remove the long ```%changelog``` sections from .spec files, making it more readable and it would enable to autogenerate the %changelog entries from SCM logs. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/393___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFE: Finer-grained symbol dependencies (#362)
Yeah set versions is no doubt clever. Problem is it's too clever for my taste. Call me a chicken anytime you like but I'm not this thing in: http://git.altlinux.org/gears/r/rpm.git?p=rpm.git;a=blob;f=lib/set.c;h=9474a2ee6d7c9ce321d131cc310bfb4e80bdc6e4;hb=HEAD -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/362#issuecomment-364926552___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFE: Finer-grained symbol dependencies (#362)
Closed #362. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/362#event-1469470480___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Mono dependencies are not always completely accurate (#185)
Reading the linked issue that might be a problem with how fsharp was handling their symbols. I really don't know what to do here. Closing for now. Feel free to reopen if new details emerge. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/185#issuecomment-364926190___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Mono dependencies are not always completely accurate (#185)
Closed #185. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/185#event-1469468134___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFE: make possible to pass multiple dirs to `_*dir` macro (#352)
NAK for paths, it creates more problems than it solves. Having rpm default to a modern dist-git style layout (or a trivial one-liner way to enable it) would be more useful. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/352#issuecomment-364923287___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFE: make possible to pass multiple dirs to `_*dir` macro (#352)
Closed #352. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/352#event-1469447590___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] _debugsource_packages break tests (#277)
Closed #277. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/277#event-1469399085___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] _debugsource_packages break tests (#277)
I guess there was a point where distro settings would mess our test-suite, but that's no longer the case. Other than that, we'll just fix the tests if/when start defaulting to debugsource on. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/277#issuecomment-364916482___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFC: standard macro syntax for macro files (#309)
The declarative macro files are fine the way they are, we don't want spec parser-style complex conditionals in rpm configuration. A more productive path might be having a kind of include path that you could use from specs, think of eg `%include `. I think there's a bug/ticket for something like that someplace but can't seem to find it atm. Anyway, closing this one as I don't see us changing the macro file syntax. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/309#issuecomment-364913720___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFC: standard macro syntax for macro files (#309)
Closed #309. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/309#event-1469378396___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Fix error message for rpmlock (#355), by removing dead code (#358)
I guess I got a bit lost between them all. Thanks for the fix :). -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/358#issuecomment-364911042___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Python tests are running even python support is disabled (#264)
Same with Lua support, although those tests are more scattered around. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/264#issuecomment-364910017___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add optional Class: attribute into Preamble (#236)
Closed #236. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/236#event-1469344602___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Add optional Class: attribute into Preamble (#236)
Yeah, Group already exists and yet nobody these days sees it as serving anything useful, so adding another classifier tag doesn't seem that productive. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/236#issuecomment-364909049___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Request to apply IMA signatures to files even if deemed a configuration file (#364)
Closed #364. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/364#event-1469283490___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Request to apply IMA signatures to files even if deemed a configuration file (#364)
Yeah it's a bit strange - those "config files" are not supposed to be changed then they're not really config files, are they? Anyway, commit 99887fec108110f0c85c060fcce48d13f807d058 added a mode where you can sign the configs too if you so wish. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/364#issuecomment-364900662___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] python-macro-helper should not have shebang and x flag (#387)
Fixed in commit faf7d87fda3456382cf161ff11a2ad8e00ae4ab0, thanks for the report -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/387#issuecomment-364898947___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Python module's name changed unnecessarily, making it impossible to express dependencies on it (#373)
Closed #373. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/373#event-1469261044___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Fix error message for rpmlock (#355), by removing dead code (#358)
Oh, I copied the new message to the ticket but not the commit, doh. Anyway: ``` $ ./rpm -e mlocate < /dev/null error: can't create transaction lock on /var/lib/rpm/.rpm.lock (Permission denied) ``` -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/358#issuecomment-364897047___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] adding `exit 0` in %install makes debuginfo to not generate (#315)
Yes. Don't do that! -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/315#issuecomment-364895755___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Fix error message for rpmlock (#355), by removing dead code (#358)
Your commit shows the old message, but not the new one. What does it show now? If I'm decoding my past self's comments correctly, I was concerned not to have the message be EBADF since that also seems quite puzzling. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/358#issuecomment-364895839___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] adding `exit 0` in %install makes debuginfo to not generate (#315)
Closed #315. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/315#event-1469249127___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Fix error message for rpmlock (#355), by removing dead code (#358)
Fixed by restoring errno around isatty() instead in commit b89eb35c6034d43a8048ac9d452a1921596071a7 -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/358#issuecomment-364894671___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] rpm without TTY gives wrong error message (#355)
Closed #355. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/355#event-1469240148___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] rpm without TTY gives wrong error message (#355)
First part was already fixed in commit df053dd36461042e4d11a21a97e9be9058204658, second half now in commit b89eb35c6034d43a8048ac9d452a1921596071a7: ``` [pmatilai@sopuli rpm]$ ./rpm -e mlocate error: can't create transaction lock on /var/lib/rpm/.rpm.lock (Permission denied) [pmatilai@sopuli rpm]$ ./rpm -e mlocate < /dev/null error: can't create transaction lock on /var/lib/rpm/.rpm.lock (Permission denied) ``` -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/355#issuecomment-364894509___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFE: BuildRequires generator (#104)
If we had `%build_requires -f
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Also apply signatures to config files (#374)
Merged, thanks for the patch. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/374#issuecomment-364853667___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] Also apply signatures to config files (#374)
Merged #374. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/374#event-1468954438___ Rpm-maint mailing list Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.org http://lists.rpm.org/mailman/listinfo/rpm-maint
