Closed #273.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/273#event-1198685863___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm
As already noted, the bindings are closely bound to rpm and a particular
version of it. Sorry but no.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/273#issuecomment-321
Merged manually (commit 9a9eefc40e56821a2bc12de78114c623a7d5a461 and
7fe183d66008c379bcdeb8fd82a8585924347b92), I added back the mention it's ported
from rpm5.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.
Closed #296.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/296#event-1198781684___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm.o
Merged manually (commit 9a9eefc and 7fe183d) from #296, I added back the
mention it's ported from rpm5.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/234#issuecomment-321
Implemented in commit 47f0a899eff78230d2b9a00d23474845579d1582, thanks Pavlina.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/222#issuecomment-321215086_
Closed #222.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/222#event-1198810344___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm
This PR is now four months old, where not a single comment on it has been made.
The implementation is completely unintrusive and at possibility to even create
regressions, yet not a single feedback..?
What gives?
In contrast to the preceeding rpmpython PR, this one has addresses all issues
wit
Closed #157.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/157#event-1199237544___
Rpm-maint mailing list
Rpm-maint@lists.rpm
Yeah I suppose we can close this now, the format detection is less of an issue
now that rebuillddb wipes out the old cruft.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issue
Closed #297 via 3684424fe297c996bb05bb64631336fa2903df12.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/pull/297#event-1199343994___
Closed #256 via 3684424fe297c996bb05bb64631336fa2903df12.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/256#event-1199343984_
HAVE_ZSTD should be HAVE_ZSTD_H
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/commit/33ca6d033341b1a60a24046556450172d6a75a2e#commitcomment-23561620___
@n3npq no.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/commit/33ca6d033341b1a60a24046556450172d6a75a2e#commitcomment-23563374___
R
You can certainly use any Baroque'n logic scheme you wish. What is done in the
check-in is condition BZIP on a test for an include, while ZSTD is conditioned
on a test for a library.
Consistency is important too.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to thi
15 matches
Mail list logo