Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFE: add option to use an external decompressor to rpm2cpio and rpm2archive (Issue #1939)

2024-04-05 Thread Panu Matilainen
Oh, I forgot there were all these loosely related steps listed in the description. Whatever happens in this space is not significant behavior changes by any measure. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFE: add option to use an external decompressor to rpm2cpio and rpm2archive (Issue #1939)

2024-04-05 Thread Daniel Alley
I read this issue as being "we should fail, but currently we ignore by default. Let's fail by default and provide an option to ignore" Which would be a change to how it currently behaves in addition to adding a new option (to restore present behavior) But I might have read that incorrectly

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFE: add option to use an external decompressor to rpm2cpio and rpm2archive (Issue #1939)

2024-04-04 Thread Panu Matilainen
Uh? This would be just an extra option, not replace any existing functionality. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1939#issuecomment-2038983260 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID:

Re: [Rpm-maint] [rpm-software-management/rpm] RFE: add option to use an external decompressor to rpm2cpio and rpm2archive (Issue #1939)

2024-04-04 Thread Daniel Alley
@pmatilai As a behavioral change, perhaps this is suitable for RPM v6? (as in v6 of the tool, not v6 of the format) -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/rpm/issues/1939#issuecomment-2038570348 You are receiving this because you are