Thanks
But it seems there is some access permission
For example
http://wraptastic.org/pub/i386-linux/RPMS/rpm-5.0.2-1.i386.rpm
On Feb 6, 2008 12:42 AM, Jeff Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 5, 2008, at 5:17 PM, devzero2000 wrote:
Good !!1
But the rpm, where
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 4:28 AM, Jeff Johnson n3...@mac.com wrote:
On May 23, 2009, at 9:39 PM, barcaroller wrote:
Ah, I see what you are asking now.
As you know, the GNU autotools do (at least) three things:
- they check for dependencies and other stuff (configure)
I'm unaware of any
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Michael Lasevich mich...@lasevich.netwrote:
I need to package an rpm that contains files with spaces in them. Sounds
like it should be easy, but I am completely stuck. I tried the backslash
escape, I tried putting the filename in double quotes - nothing seems
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 1:44 AM, Michael
Lasevichmisdirec...@lasevich.net wrote:
Ok, my root has these files and directories (all empty):
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Jul 12 19:18 File With Spaces
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jul 12 19:12 dir With Spaces
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jul 12 19:12
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Jeff Johnson n3...@mac.com wrote:
On Sep 18, 2009, at 12:11 PM, Saravanan Shanmugham (sarvi) wrote:
Separating the symbol files and into their own package is definitely in
the plans.
Well, packaging detached debugging symbols (and source code so
that
High performance computing systems are very popular for some time. The
problems of Hign Avalibility computer systems are common in the same
way.
The question is how a package management system as rpm5 can address
the problems of such environments. I have not found any reference to
such issues, in
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Jeff Johnson n3...@mac.com wrote:
On Dec 7, 2009, at 9:37 AM, devzero2000 wrote:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Jeff Johnson n3...@mac.com wrote:
On Dec 7, 2009, at 7:47 AM, devzero2000 wrote:
High performance computing systems are very popular for some
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Manoj Palhade mpalh...@googlemail.comwrote:
Dear RPM Team,
I have requirement to change RPM Version Name.
In AC_INIT of configure.ac is the best place IMHO and after rebuild.
Regards
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Joe Flowers joe.flow...@nofreewill.comwrote:
Hello Everyone,
I am trying to create an RPM that will install a daemon correctly, but
I'm not sure if or where I should put the command:
chkconfig --level 345 /etc/rc.d/mydaemon on
Should this line go
It depends if your package use autoconf,automake,libtool or not. BTW, the
standard
way is setarch i386 rpmbuild --target=i386 --rebuild pippo.src.rpm, or
better use an automated tool that do this as mock, for
examplehttp://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Projects/Mock.
On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Jeff Johnson n3...@mac.com wrote:
On Jun 4, 2010, at 2:55 AM, Belal Salem wrote:
Hi there!
I issued the same issue before, when installing some packages, the RPM
package manager doesn't create the required folders and ask for the folders
as unresolved
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Levon Poghosyan deimusmeis...@gmail.comwrote:
Thanks for the reply.
The situation is following. I've got an application which installs bunch of
rpm packages.
Some of those packages have post scriptlet failing, so I need to
know/figure out which are failing.
://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=569930
was openened formally to redhat. But it does not seem to have been taken into
account so far.
Best Regards
On 13 October 2011 11:04, devzero2000 pinto.e...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Levon Poghosyan deimusmeis...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Maruthi Devulapalli
maruthi.devulapa...@axa-tech.com wrote:
Hi All,
** **
Need your help with this,
** **
make[3]: Entering directory xmlFreeParserCtxt'
/tmp/rpm/rpm-5.3.5/misc/.libs/librpmmisc.so: undefined reference to
-- Forwarded message --
From: devzero2000 pinto.e...@gmail.com
Date: Sun, 27 May 2012 08:14:53 +0200
Subject: Fwd: [Puppet Users] Managing Puppet modules as RPMs
To: rpm-u...@rpm5.org
Fyi.
Despite some FUD the use case is interesting for devops.
Best regards
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Mykel Alvis
mal...@restorationhardware.com wrote:
devzero2000 over on the rpm-users list suggested
%define _use_internal_dependency_generator 0
My self, devzero2000 (Elia Pinto) is part of the rpm5 team, thanks to
jeff. Since the request was for rpm 4.8 I
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Jeffrey Johnson n3...@me.com wrote:
On Jan 5, 2013, at 4:02 PM, Mykel Alvis wrote:
devzero2000 over on the rpm-users list suggested
%define _use_internal_dependency_generator 0
This did exactly what I needed.
Yes but … there are profound changes
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Ibrahim Yurtseven
arastirmaci...@aol.de wrote:
Hey ho,
Which distros are using rpm5 except Mandriva?
Maybe Mageia, the Mandriva fork?
No. Mageia was not interested some time ago.
https://www.mageia.org/pipermail/mageia-dev/20110302/002867.html.
Rosalab for
18 matches
Mail list logo
