http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302
Felix Kaechele fe...@fetzig.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fe...@fetzig.org
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302
--- Comment #4 from Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at 2009-01-05 10:35:40
---
FFMpeg has an LGPLed decoder for Shorten.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=300
--- Comment #11 from Robert Scheck rpmfusion-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de
2009-01-05 18:16:01 ---
In Fedora it is not because of Artistic 1.0. So that makes it nonfree for
RPM Fusion?
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303
Summary: Review request: Mupen64Plus - A Nintendo64 Emulator
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: i386
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=300
--- Comment #12 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2009-01-05 18:31:01 ---
imo, yes, rpmfusions's definition of free is the same as fedora's, sans
patents.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171
--- Comment #19 from Thorsten Leemhuis fed...@leemhuis.info 2009-01-05
18:50:25 ---
(In reply to comment #18)
PackageKit integration is possible as well, but then that means that we will
have to ship all of the config files by default and
My name is Juan Moreno and I would like to become a packager for RPM Fusion.
This is my first time asking to be in any type of packaging system so I
might be some what of a noob to the whole thing. I am not new to the world
of linux though. I have had almost 2 years running Fedora on my laptop and
Hi list,
as of 0.2b6, qmc2 added support for SDLMESS, which requires a separate
binary to be built. It is still preliminary and pretty much useless now,
but it is quite likely to change with next release. Thus, I have made an
initial attempt to overhaul the spec file so that both binaries could
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=300
--- Comment #7 from Robert Scheck rpmfusion-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de 2009-01-05
16:35:09 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Then there is some non-standard behaviour in pgadmin ... wxGTK apps are using
%{_localedir}. I will try to check that.
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303
--- Comment #8 from Juan Moreno uncholow...@gmail.com 2009-01-05 15:03:21 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
(In reply to comment #6)
I will make the proper changes and report back. Can you suggest a hosting
site?
Because you already have a
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303
--- Comment #5 from Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com 2009-01-05 12:15:07
---
(In reply to comment #4)
The application already installs a .desktop file itself. I will take a look at
the mupen64 srpm.
If that is the case, you are not
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303
--- Comment #3 from Juan Moreno uncholow...@gmail.com 2009-01-05 11:26:23 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Please be as kind as to NOT ignore the warning about the line too long. Proper
formatting helps in displaying properly in package
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171
--- Comment #21 from Thorsten Leemhuis fed...@leemhuis.info 2009-01-05
20:23:11 ---
(In reply to comment #20)
(In reply to comment #19)
Ehh, why? Just let each x11-xorg-drv-foo package create a small subpackage
x11-xorg-drv-foo-hwinfo
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289
--- Comment #10 from Allisson Azevedo allis...@gmail.com 2009-01-05 14:28:08
---
spec:
http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/gstreamer-pitfdll/gstreamer-pitfdll.spec
srpm:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302
--- Comment #6 from rc040...@freenet.de 2009-01-05 17:26:52 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #1)
This package seemingly is not 64bit clean:
...
I could provide a patch to hack around this issue, but ...
...
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=300
--- Comment #6 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2009-01-05 16:32:51 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #4)
You should remove the wxstd.mo files, they are distributed in the main wxGTK
package and then install pgadmin3.mo into
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=300
--- Comment #5 from Robert Scheck rpmfusion-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de 2009-01-05
16:18:13 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
You should remove the wxstd.mo files, they are distributed in the main wxGTK
package and then install pgadmin3.mo into
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=300
--- Comment #9 from Robert Scheck rpmfusion-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de 2009-01-05
18:06:32 ---
BTW, is pgadmin3 for RPM Fusion free or nonfree?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289
--- Comment #8 from Allisson Azevedo allis...@gmail.com 2009-01-05 12:51:10
---
Update package:
spec:
http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/gstreamer-pitfdll/gstreamer-pitfdll.spec
srpm:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303
--- Comment #2 from Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com 2009-01-05 11:20:37
---
You are not providing a desktop file, which is mandatory for a GUI application:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files
Please also see
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171
--- Comment #22 from Thorsten Leemhuis fed...@leemhuis.info 2009-01-05
20:54:43 ---
(In reply to comment #21)
I'm jumping back and forth here, but I've scanned through the Gnome HIG and
it
would be acceptable to use a drop-down menu
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=269
David Timms dti...@iinet.net.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dti...@iinet.net.au
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171
--- Comment #23 from Stewart Adam s.a...@diffingo.com 2009-01-05 21:01:02 ---
(In reply to comment #21)
No; it IMHO definitely should be part of the driver package and completely
auto
generated there. Maintaining such a package manually
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303
--- Comment #4 from Juan Moreno uncholow...@gmail.com 2009-01-05 11:27:40 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
You are not providing a desktop file, which is mandatory for a GUI
application:
Julian Sikorski pisze:
Hi list,
as of 0.2b6, qmc2 added support for SDLMESS, which requires a separate
binary to be built. It is still preliminary and pretty much useless now,
but it is quite likely to change with next release. Thus, I have made an
initial attempt to overhaul the spec file
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303
Manuel Wolfshant wo...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=300
--- Comment #3 from Robert Scheck rpmfusion-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de 2009-01-05
11:39:43 ---
Manuel, I've hunted down to the following now. But how to solve i18n issues?
The files can't be simply moved to %{_localedir}, because wxstd.mo
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=300
--- Comment #13 from Robert Scheck rpmfusion-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de
2009-01-05 22:35:13 ---
The following updated package should address all issues mentioned above and
more as well; rpmlint is silent for me when ignoring the license message.
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303
--- Comment #10 from Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at 2009-01-06 04:59:33
---
And for the optflags I am guessing I am supposed to split out a devel package?
No, you are supposed to make sure that the optimization flags contained in the
29 matches
Mail list logo
