Re: Anyone have access to a PPC64LE-based system?

usion.org > To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org > -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature _

Re: [Bug 5477] New: Review request: videomorph - Small GUI wrapper for FFMPEG based on PyQt5

> > ___ > rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org > To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org > -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot o

python2-scons on Fedora 32

Hi all. The `mixxx` package needs an update for using python3-scons on Rawhide branch. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: gnustep-base 1.26.0

Yes, sorry. I mixed up `unar` with `unrar`. On 25/08/19 21:43, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Antonio Trande wrote: >> 'gnustep-base' 1.26.0 will be pushed on Fedora Rawhide in 10 days. >> >> Package involved: unrar > > Nope. As was already pointed out on th

gnustep-base 1.26.0

Hi all. 'gnustep-base' 1.26.0 will be pushed on Fedora Rawhide in 10 days. Package involved: unrar Scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37267892 -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key

MythTV with Python3

your opinion? [1] https://github.com/opacam/python3-tmdb3 -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [mythtv] Fix Python binding conditional macro

_extra_fonts: ... } > > > > > > > -- > Sérgio M. B. > ___ > rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- > rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org > To unsubscribe send an email to > rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.o

Re: [typos fixed] Re: Scratch builds never work

ild --srpm > rfpkg scratch-build --srpm > > > > On Sat, 2019-08-03 at 20:30 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Sat, 2019-08-03 at 14:11 -0400, FeRD wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 12:51 PM Antonio Trande > wrote: > > Hi all. > > Since some days i can't do

Scratch builds never work

Hi all. Since some days i can't do scratch build both on f30-free and rawhide-free: http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/getfile?taskID=340985=DEFAULT=root.log=-4000 -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https

Re: LiVES-3.0.0

On 29/07/19 14:05, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > Le lun. 29 juil. 2019 à 13:10, Nicolas Chauvet a écrit : >> >> Le lun. 29 juil. 2019 à 12:34, Antonio Trande a >> écrit : >>> >>> Cinnamon is a fork of Gnome... >>> It happens on Gnome too. >>>

Re: LiVES-3.0.0

mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org > To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org > -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org

LiVES-3.0.0

Hi all. Could anyone test LiVES-3.0.0-pre1 on a non-Gnome system, please? http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=339659 Especially, if main window is correctly expanded/repositioned/resized. Thanks. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key

Re: rfpkgdb-cli and rfpkg

On 26/03/19 18:50, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > Le mar. 26 mars 2019 à 18:33, Antonio Trande a écrit : >> >> On 26/03/19 18:18, Sérgio Basto wrote:> On Tue, 2019-03-26 at 10:42 >> +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >>>> Le mar. 19 mars 2019 à 19:02, Sérgio Basto a >

Re: rfpkgdb-cli and rfpkg

thon3 only with f30+ > > I moved rpmfusion-packager-setup to python3, now should be just swap > pyhton2 to python3 in rfpkg like fedpkg > I'm preparing 'rfpkg' for Python3 on fedora 30+ and rhel 8+, but it needs to be modified for using the new 'rfpkgdb-cli' (http://koji.rpmfusion.org/k

rfpkgdb-cli and rfpkg

Hi all. Is anyone already working on 'rfpkgdb-cli' packaging? It looks like required by 'rfpkg' and, therefore, it needs work for using 'rfpkgdb-cli' -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https

Re: Doing reviews for RPMFusion

release (unannounced ABI break) > > This is a community project, so I cannot brame one in particular. But > I re-interate that RPM Fusion is a community project, and at this time > I'm holding too much load by myself for no reason. > If this trivial fix cannot be sorted out

Re: lives-2.10.1-1.fc29 successfully moved from f29-free-updates-testing into f29-free-updates by kwizart

ee-updates-testing > Into Tag: f29-free-updates > > lives-2.10.1-1.fc29 successfully moved from f29-free-updates-testing into > f29-free-updates by kwizart > -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key serve

Re: [el7] Upgrading with newer ffmpeg/x264/x265

On 09/12/18 03:42, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Sat, 2018-12-08 at 23:20 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote: >> All packages should be okay on el7 except 'transcode' (dead upstream) >> and 'tvheadend' for missing dependencies. > > Hi, > > Many tanks for your work, I know it wa

[el7] Upgrading with newer ffmpeg/x264/x265

All packages should be okay on el7 except 'transcode' (dead upstream) and 'tvheadend' for missing dependencies. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ signature.asc Description

Re: mythtv rebuilds

Anyway, mythtv is ready for el7. I will push it on rawhide without build. On 08/12/18 20:15, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 1:10 PM Antonio Trande <mailto:anto.tra...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Hi all. > > 'mythtv' is the last rpm tha

mythtv rebuilds

/urlgrabber to get these Python3 packages -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: New ZoneMinder packages - except el7

t; To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org > -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ signature.asc Desc

Re: [el7] Upgrading with newer ffmpeg/x264/x265

Hi. There is an internet line breakdown here in these days (Southern Italy looks became a "land of tornado" in last years). Please, be patient. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key ser

Re: [el7] gpac-devel-static

x264-0.148 requires it. On 25/11/18 15:30, Leigh Scott wrote: > If there are no packages in rpmfusion that require the static lib we > should remove it IMO. > -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key serv

Re: [el7] gpac-devel-static

I need to know if you agree with this propose. On 22/11/18 19:41, Antonio Trande wrote: > Hi. > > About gpac, i see a 'gpac-devel-static' sub-package created that, as you > know, is a naming method not permitted for Fedora guidelines [1][2]. > There are two choices in these case

Re: [el7] Upgrading with newer ffmpeg/x264/x265

anch or master) and > apply a minor is my 2nd choice . > Else yes push them on rpmfusion-el7 branch only. > > Can you explain what you mean with "ff (fast-forward )" please? -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4

[el7] Upgrading with newer ffmpeg/x264/x265

-1.1.7-23.el7.src.rpm vlc-3.0.5-6.el7.src.rpm xine-lib-1.2.9-11.el7.src.rpm zoneminder-1.32.2-2.el7.src.rpm How to manage this operation? Shall i push them on rpmfusion-el7 branch only? -- *--Antonio Trande* *mail*: mailto:sagit...@fedoraproject.org

Re: [el7] mpd-1:0.20.22 dependencies

'mpd-1:0.20.22' looks incompatible with boost-1.53 on el7. I'm forced to keep current release (0.19.21) On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 10:30 PM Antonio Trande wrote: > Hi all. > > 'mpd-1:0.20.22' can be built on el7 if missing dependencies are rebuilt > from Fedora [1][2]. > I've

[el7] mpd-1:0.20.22 dependencies

-- *--Antonio Trande* *mail*: mailto:sagit...@fedoraproject.org ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: [el7] ffmpeg-3.3 vs ffmpeg-3.4

None specific requirement. Maybe Sergio has one: "Cool , so you may update libmfx on epel 7 ? please" On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 2:05 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski < domi...@greysector.net> wrote: > On Friday, 23 November 2018 at 12:19, Antonio Trande wrote: > > Good!

Re: [el7] ffmpeg-3.3 vs ffmpeg-3.4

Good! Let's go with ffmpeg-3.4.5 + x264-0.148 + libmfx-1.23 (push it on el7 please) + x265-2.9 On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 2:56 AM Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Thu, 2018-11-22 at 22:16 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: > > On Thursday, 22 November 2018 at 18:13, Antonio

Re: [el7] ffmpeg-3.3 vs ffmpeg-3.4

mmpeg , x264 etc > > FFmpeg 3.3 and x264 0.148 > > El7 is one stable branch we need think in stable and wide tested releases > . > > On Thu, 2018-11-22 at 18:13 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote: > > Hi all again. > > What FFmpeg version we prefer for el7? > ffmpeg-3.3

[el7] gpac-devel-static

-guidelines/#packaging-static-libraries [2] https://rpmfusion.org/Contributors#Read_the_packaging_guidelines -- *--Antonio Trande* *mail*: mailto:sagit...@fedoraproject.org ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers

[el7] ffmpeg-3.3 vs ffmpeg-3.4

. Thanks. -- *--Antonio Trande* *mail*: mailto:sagit...@fedoraproject.org ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org

Re: [el7] gstreamer-plugins-ugly vs x264-0.155

+0100, Antonio Trande wrote: > > It's a possibility, but i must rebuild all related packages again! > > Antonio , some time ago we (RPMFusion) agree use x264-0.148 in el7 ( I > was not sure when wrote to you some day ago) . > We choose x264-0.148 because is really stable. After 3 years

Re: [el7] gstreamer-plugins-ugly vs x264-0.155

end an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org > -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP di

[el7] gstreamer-plugins-ugly vs x264-0.155

/gstreamer/gst-plugins-ugly/issues/23 Thanks. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Upgrading EL7 with a newer ffmpeg

On 20/11/18 17:24, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > Le mar. 20 nov. 2018 à 16:51, Antonio Trande a écrit : > [...] >> Most of packages treated in this discussion follow the packaging >> timeline of the rawhide branch except these >> >> ffmpeg >> audacity-freeworld >

Re: Upgrading EL7 with a newer ffmpeg

On 20/11/18 15:58, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > Le mer. 14 nov. 2018 à 15:00, Antonio Trande a écrit : >> >> All srpm are ready: >> https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/centos7/ >> >> I have conformed/patched some of them to recent Fedora packaging guidelines. > Okay,

Fwd: Upgrading EL7 with a newer ffmpeg

All packages are built fine on local, test them yourself. Only the tvheadend/dtv-scan-tables issue is pending. PS. Mail sent without GPG signature from Windows. On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 11:20 PM Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > Le lun. 19 nov. 2018 à 17:52, Antonio Trande a > écrit : > ... &

Upgrading EL7 with a newer ffmpeg

On 19/11/18 17:23, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > Le ven. 16 nov. 2018 à 22:37, Antonio Trande a écrit : >> >> Review request for 'dtv-scan-tables' on el7-free branch only: >> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5082 > > Sorry if I've missed things, but could we

Re: Upgrading EL7 with a newer ffmpeg

side, please > request any provenpackager to help fix the package there if needed > (and Mauro do not answer). > > Any issue on other ffmpeg/x264/x265 packages for el7 ? > > Thx > -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x5E212

Re: Upgrading EL7 with a newer ffmpeg

ckage should be provided on the epel side, please > request any provenpackager to help fix the package there if needed > (and Mauro do not answer). > > Any issue on other ffmpeg/x264/x265 packages for el7 ? > > Thx > -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter

Re: Upgrading EL7 with a newer ffmpeg

What's the fate of these srpms now? Should i push them myself on repos? On 14/11/18 15:00, Antonio Trande wrote: > All srpm are ready: > https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/centos7/ > > I have conformed/patched some of them to recent Fedora packaging guidelines. > > Just t

Re: Upgrading EL7 with a newer ffmpeg

20180606gitc2b6af67f7d8.fc30 dtv-scan-tables-1-**9**.20171226git07b18ecef174.fc29 dtv-scan-tables-1-8.20161007git0b42d8e8b44e.fc28 dtv-scan-tables-1-7.20161007git0b42d8e8b44e.fc27 ... See these examples: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Versioning_Examples#Complex_versioning_examples Bes

Re: Upgrading EL7 with a newer ffmpeg

All srpm are ready: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/centos7/ I have conformed/patched some of them to recent Fedora packaging guidelines. Just tvheadend-4.2.7 has a missing dependence (dtv-scan-tables) that is not on Fedora neither on CentOS. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto

Re: Upgrading EL7 with a newer ffmpeg

not support ffmpeg-3*) x264-0.155-3.20180806git0a84d98_bootstrap.el7.src.rpm x264-0.155-3.20180806git0a84d98.el7.src.rpm xine-lib-1.2.9-11.el7.src.rpm Tomorrow, i will look the others rpms. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key

Re: Upgrading EL7 with a newer ffmpeg

build (or src.rpm) ? >>> what you mean or where are "forwarded the patches" ? >> The patches to compile ffmpeg 3.3 in el7 are available into the f27 branch. >> So you can submit a scratch build for el7 based on the fc27 branch as a >> start. > > Still anyone t

Re: Please hold your build

that we will push right to stable updates. > We need all the infra resources for building and preparing the repos, > so please hold your build until the next package got published. > > Thx for your understanding. > -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter

El7 builds broken for missing CMake

Hello everyone. My scratch builds on el7-free repository are failing for missing 'Packages/c/cmake3-3.12.0-1.el7.x86_64.rpm': http://koji.rpmfusion.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/6968/256968/root.log -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key

Re: Upgrading EL7 with a newer ffmpeg

17.el7.src.rpm > tvheadend-4.0.9-3.el7.src.rpm > vlc-2.2.8-2.el7.src.rpm > x264-0.148-11.20160614gita5e06b9.el7.src.rpm > xine-lib-1.2.9-2.el7.src.rpm > zoneminder-1.30.4-3.el7.src.rpm > > (2) > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mirrormanager/statistics/2018-09-0

Re: [moc] Use %%{?_isa} on 'Requires' package

;> Use %%{?_isa} on 'Requires' package > >> -Requires: ffmpeg >> +Requires: ffmpeg%{?_isa} > > Why such change ? Indeed ffmpeg is not needed by MOC for working. I removed it. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key:

koji-rpmfusion sslv3 alert certificate

RPMFusion, but nothing is changed. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ rpmfusion

Fwd: LiVES 2.8.9 relesed

Forwarded Message Subject:LiVES 2.8.9 relesed Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 13:46:45 -0300 From: salsaman To: João Luís Marques Pinto , Alessio Treglia , enc...@users.sourceforge.net, Glen MacArthur

Fedora's packages rebuilds not synchronized

Hello. Packages from Fedora repositories have not same version on all architectures: 'lives' rebuild on f29 uses 'libfreenect-0.5.7' on x86_64 and aarch64, instead it uses (broken) 'libfreenect-0.5.5' on PPC* and i686: http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=211412 -- --- Antonio

Re: Access to the Rpmfusion repositories

I downloaded it again when i realized of the access problem. > Also do you have the recently server root ca. > I wonder if you have run kinit for the fedpkg side ? Does it conflicts > with rfpkg ? > > Thx I don't know. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitt

Re: Access to the Rpmfusion repositories

On 13/12/2017 09:59, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2017-12-08 10:56 GMT+01:00 Antonio Trande <anto.tra...@gmail.com>: >> On 08/12/2017 02:13, Sérgio Basto wrote: > >>> please try : >>> rfpkg --user sagitter clone free/lives >>> >> >> This c

Re: Access to the Rpmfusion repositories

On 08/12/2017 02:13, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Thu, 2017-12-07 at 22:47 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote: >> On 07/12/2017 09:36, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >>> 2017-12-06 22:36 GMT+01:00 Antonio Trande <anto.tra...@gmail.com>: >>>> Hi all. >>>&

Re: Access to the Rpmfusion repositories

On 07/12/2017 09:36, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2017-12-06 22:36 GMT+01:00 Antonio Trande <anto.tra...@gmail.com>: >> Hi all. >> >> I can't checkout a package's GIT module: >> >> $ rfpkg clone free/lives >> Deprecation warning: kojiconfig is depre

Re: Access to the Rpmfusion repositories

On 07/12/2017 09:36, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2017-12-06 22:36 GMT+01:00 Antonio Trande <anto.tra...@gmail.com>: >> Hi all. >> >> I can't checkout a package's GIT module: >> >> $ rfpkg clone free/lives >> Deprecation warning: kojiconfig is depre

Access to the Rpmfusion repositories

non-zero exit status 128 -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ rpmfusion

duplicate key value violates unique constraint

kID=154032 -- -- Antonio Trande sagitter AT fedoraproject dot org See my vCard. <> signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusi

Broken dependencies (vlc,perl)

.20170601git.fc27.ppc64le DEBUG util.py:439: (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages) http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/getfile?taskID=132891=DEFAULT=root.log=-4000 Please, fix it as soon as you can. -- -- Antonio Trande sagitter AT fedoraproject dot org See my vCard

Re: ffmpeg-3.2 on f25

of revive Steering > Committee I already patched xpra-codecs-freeworld for building against ffmpeg-3.1 anyway. I agree with Richard: all affected packages should be rebuilt offline before to ensure all packages build at a minimum. I have successfully rebuilt 'moc', 'xpra-codecs-freeworld' and 'li

ffmpeg-3.2 on f25

Hello. Please, build ffmpeg-3.2 on f25 if possible. -- -- Antonio Trande sagitter AT fedoraproject dot org See my vCard. <> signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-deve

Re: xpra-codecs-freeworld needs maintainer !

On 04/18/2017 11:48 AM, Antonio Trande wrote: > Despite your patch for ffmpeg31, xpra still fails with following error: > https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/FUA8uWN~mNELJYwEicqWaV5M1UNdIGYhyRLivL9gydE=/raw > The error is not visible. Here: https://paste.fedoraproject.

Re: xpra-codecs-freeworld needs maintainer !

017 12:27, Antonio Trande wrote: >>> I take it. >>> >>> On 04/17/2017 12:18 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: >>>> Hello , >>>> >>>> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4432 >>>> >>>> Since maintainer looks like is

Re: xpra-codecs-freeworld needs maintainer !

Thank you very much Xavier. I'm updating everything. On 04/17/2017 10:24 PM, Xavier Bachelot wrote: > On 17/04/2017 12:44, Xavier Bachelot wrote: >> On 17/04/2017 12:27, Antonio Trande wrote: >>> I take it. >>> >>> On 04/17/2017 12:18 PM, Sérgio Basto

Re: xpra-codecs-freeworld needs maintainer !

I take it. On 04/17/2017 12:18 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hello , > > https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4432 > > Since maintainer looks like is unresponsive , I'd add someone as > maintainer of this package. > > Thanks, > -- -- Antonio Trande sagitt

Build failure on rawhide ARM

/root.log -- --- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x6CE6D08A Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: As of today, MP3 decoding software is permissible in Fedora.

files. > From a quick review libmad, madplay mpg123 could get it, but not lame. > Anyone to start reviewing theses into fedora ? > > Thx > I don't see any explicit page on Fedora Project's wiki or mailing list (Tom Callaway's tweet apart) yet. Or I'm wrong? -- --- Antoni

Re: [lives] Fix multi_encoder3 python interpreter

the point of setting it to python2 in the line before? > This commit should be correct: https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/free/lives.git/commit/?id=5f7db3b749699e678e4bb05b32af1e8d99e6c137 (I had totally ignored first -name option in the 'find' commands). -- --- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter

Review swap

Hi. I can review in return of http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4258. Any chance? -- --- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x6CE6D08A Check on https

Unable to do scratch build on rawhide

Hi all. Since 2 days at least, scratch builds on rawhide branch are impossible because of missing downloads: http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/getfile?taskID=32719=root.log=-4000 http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=32719 -- --- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot

Failed to retrieve glibc-2.23.90-30.fc25

://koji.rpmfusion.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/8217/18217/root.log -- --- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x6CE6D08A Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP

No package on updates-testing

Hello. I can't install my packages (lives and moc) from rpmfusion-free-updates-testing yet. Should they be automatically pushed after their build or not ? -- --- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: About chromium packaging

rom the developers mailing list where this > has been discussed. > To be, the only valid reason why a software can be banned from the > repo is that it cannot be redistributed. > > -- --- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.co

Updates of a package

Hi all. RPMFusion/Contributors page says: > A package built for a stable release (e.g. f24, f23) will go to the "updates-testing" repository. How? Manually? Or automatically? -- --- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpre

Scratch builds

Hi. What right way to do a scratch builds against rawhide (f25)? -- --- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x6CE6D08A Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ signature.asc

Re: Repository access denied

On 07/08/2016 10:16 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2016-07-08 21:37 GMT+02:00 Antonio Trande <anto.tra...@gmail.com>: >> On 07/08/2016 09:26 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >>> 2016-07-08 21:15 GMT+02:00 Antonio Trande <anto.tra...@gmail.com>: >>>> Hi.

Re: Repository access denied

On 07/08/2016 09:26 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2016-07-08 21:15 GMT+02:00 Antonio Trande <anto.tra...@gmail.com>: >> Hi. >> >> I can't access to new repository for 'lives': >> >> $ rfpkg clone free/lives >> Cloning into 'lives'... >> E

Repository access denied

make sure you have the correct access rights and the repository exists. Could not execute clone: Command '['git', 'clone', 'ssh://sagit...@pkgs.rpmfusion.org/free/lives', '--origin', 'origin']' returned non-zero exit status 128 -- --- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http

Re: new rfpkg 1.23.3

(buildvm-01.online.rpmfusion.net) -> FAILED: ActionNotAllowed: policy violation (build_from_srpm) 0 free 0 open 0 done 1 failed 5559 build (f24-free, /git/free/moc:4a4179974562295f81672340e8345d76fb75cbd3) failed -- --- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org h

Re: [ANNOUNCE] RPM Fusion infra is back for contributors

On 06/24/2016 04:19 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Qui, 2016-06-23 at 21:48 +0200, Antonio Trande wrote: >> >> On 06/23/2016 05:24 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: >>> >>> Kwizart, >>> You ask me on IRC, if I can do a scratch build and no I got an >>&

Re: [ANNOUNCE] RPM Fusion infra is back for contributors

mplayer-16.6.0-1.fc24.src.rpm > [] 100% 00:00:02 4.68 MiB 1.85 MiB/sec > GenericError: invalid channel policy > > On Qua, 2016-06-22 at 00:58 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: Where is rpmfusion-koji command ? I can't find it .. -- --- Antonio Trande ma

Re: GPAC

to Przemysław. Other packages beyond GPAC ? > > On 21.03.2016 17:10, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > On Seg, 2016-03-21 at 12:38 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 2016-03-21 at 04:41 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > > >

Re: GPAC

Hi Sergio. Let me see what I can do with gpac. -- --- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x6CE6D08A Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ signature.asc Description: This is a digita

Re: Package assignment

updated by me; if something is not good (and probably there is something), original maintainer/s of package, temporarily busy with other business, should kindly at least check all changes before definitive approval. As provisional maintainer, I (or Sergio) cannot be familiar with all packages and kn

Re: some packages to be updated

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 02/24/2016 06:44 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Qua, 2016-02-24 at 12:40 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote: >> On 02/23/2016 09:57 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: >>> Hello, I'd like update : >>> >>> ffmpegthumbnaile

Re: some packages to be updated

said some time ago, the packages not rebuilt by time need a recompilation at least; please, do your better to get improved all RPM Fusion packages as much as possible. @Sergio If some RPM Fusion packagers are missing, please let me know, I can update their packages. - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitte

Re: libraries missing on F22 and higher

packaging guidelines of Fedora. - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x565E653C Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2

Re: libraries missing on F22 and higher

ubpackage is shared across releases > to save resources, so how much does this exception violate the > policies ...? > > K. > - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG K

Re: libraries missing on F22 and higher

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/28/2015 01:30 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Dom, 2015-12-27 at 11:51 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote: >> On 12/27/2015 09:04 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: >>> On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 01:48:23AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius >>> wrote:

Re: libraries missing on F22 and higher

on during Fedora upgrade however), here you're saying that RPMFusion packages must not be audited periodically, even for months, it's enough they work. I ask again, how can we know if a package .fc(x) compiles/works fine on Fedora(x+n) without a rebuild? - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproj

Re: libraries missing on F22 and higher

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/27/2015 12:26 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Thursday, 24 December 2015 at 11:02, Antonio Trande wrote: >> On 12/24/2015 12:32 AM, S�rgio Basto wrote: >>> On Qua, 2015-12-23 at 22:20 +0100, Antonio Trande wr

Re: libraries missing on F22 and higher

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/24/2015 12:32 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Qua, 2015-12-23 at 22:20 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote: >> On 12/23/2015 09:51 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >>> 2015-12-22 20:31 GMT+01:00 Antonio Trande >>> <anto.tra

Re: libraries missing on F22 and higher

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/23/2015 09:51 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2015-12-22 20:31 GMT+01:00 Antonio Trande <anto.tra...@gmail.com > <mailto:anto.tra...@gmail.com>>: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 > > Hi all, &g

Re: libraries missing on F22 and higher

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/22/2015 10:40 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Ter, 2015-12-22 at 21:00 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote: >> On 12/22/2015 08:47 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: >>> Hello >>> >>> On Ter, 2015-12-22 at 20:31 +010

Re: libraries missing on F22 and higher

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 12/22/2015 08:47 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hello > > On Ter, 2015-12-22 at 20:31 +0100, Antonio Trande wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> these libraries (and others probably) are not available yet on >> Fedora 22

libraries missing on F22 and higher

. - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x565E653C Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWeaUBAAoJEF5tK7VWXmU88y4H/2+50Ep

  1   2   >