Re: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld vs. aarch64

2022-01-25 Thread Kevin Kofler via rpmfusion-developers
--- Begin Message --- Vitaly Zaitsev via rpmfusion-developers wrote: > On 24/01/2022 17:50, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> Do you have any idea how we can resolve the issue or should I just go >> back to building the package on x86_64 only? > > Take a look at the Telegram Desktop hacks: >

Re: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld vs. aarch64

2022-01-24 Thread Kevin Kofler via rpmfusion-developers
--- Begin Message --- Leigh Scott wrote: > You will need to disable debuginfo (use -g0) if your going to build > for aarch64. Oh fun, I looked at the offending command line, and it does attempt to pass -g0, but this is then overwritten by -g appended (twice, even) later, coming from the RPM

Re: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld vs. aarch64

2022-01-24 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via rpmfusion-developers
--- Begin Message --- On 24/01/2022 17:50, Kevin Kofler wrote: Do you have any idea how we can resolve the issue or should I just go back to building the package on x86_64 only? Take a look at the Telegram Desktop hacks:

Re: qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld vs. aarch64

2022-01-24 Thread Leigh Scott
You will need to disable debuginfo  (use -g0)  if your going to build for aarch64. On 24/01/2022 16:50, Kevin Kofler via rpmfusion-developers wrote: ___ rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org To unsubscribe send

qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld vs. aarch64

2022-01-24 Thread Kevin Kofler via rpmfusion-developers
--- Begin Message --- Hi, since chromium-freeworld, which is based on the same codebase and takes almost twice as long to build on x86_64 as qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld, has had several successful builds on aarch64: https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=506 I have decided to give