https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4993
--- Comment #46 from Akarshan Biswas ---
@ All
I'm providing updated src rpm and spec file.
%changelog from the last time:
- Add a "--disable-gpu-driver-bug-workarounds" flag to fix video freeze on
certain integrated GPUs
- Fix building
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4993
--- Comment #47 from Antonio Trande ---
@Nicolas
Can we build last srpm on rpmfusion koji?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.___
rpmfusion-developers
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4928
FeRD (Frank Dana) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ferd...@gmail.com
--- Comment #15
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4928
--- Comment #16 from FeRD (Frank Dana) ---
BTW, if anyone needs to know where they stand driver-wise, Fermi cards have
been left behind as of April 2018. (That's when future support for new-feature
updates — starting from the 400.xx driver
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4928
--- Comment #17 from Nicolas Chauvet ---
(In reply to FeRD (Frank Dana) from comment #16)
...
> updates only through January 2019, at which point they're orphaned
> completely.
The date was updated to 2022
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4993
--- Comment #48 from Nicolas Chauvet ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #47)
> @Nicolas
>
> Can we build last srpm on rpmfusion koji?
Yes.
BTW the buildvm-05/06 has 8G of RAM whereas buildvm-01 only has 4G
Compared to copr builders
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041
--- Comment #26 from Mark Harfouche ---
Sorry Nicolas, I had totally forgotten about this.
I guess a lot has changed since 2016 and I no longer have Fedora installed.
Ultimately, I couldn't afford to stay on bleeding edge gcc (and the lib64
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4761
--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Chauvet ---
@Zamir
Does the project still hold or is there any issue?
Please try answer the questions on each bugs
Thx
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1156
Nicolas Chauvet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3430
Nicolas Chauvet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4892
--- Comment #21 from Nicolas Chauvet ---
Can we try to find a compromise on the license issue with this package ?
BTW is the retroarch code itslef GPLv3 (only) or GPLv3+ ?
Seems what's unclear in the fedora guideline about this is about the
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=
Nicolas Chauvet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5022
Nicolas Chauvet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5021
Nicolas Chauvet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5021
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Chauvet ---
please request the packages branches in admin.rpmfusion.org/pkgdb
and don't forget to set the namespace at free...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5015
Nicolas Chauvet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5015
--- Comment #10 from Nicolas Chauvet ---
Also avoid to redefine cmake3 ctest3 as I expect the same %cmake3 can be used
everywhere once you have the appropriate cmake3 dependency.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4928
--- Comment #19 from leigh scott ---
(In reply to FeRD (Frank Dana) from comment #15)
> Yeah, sorry. I would help out, but my GT 710 is (barely) a Kepler card.
Sounds perfect to me for 390xx support
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4928
--- Comment #18 from Richard ---
(In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #17)
> It means that the 390xx serie can still be relevant from el6 to any recent
> fedora.
> As a side note, el7.6 plans to enable libglvnd support, so I expect to keep
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4041
--- Comment #25 from Nicolas Chauvet ---
(In reply to Mark Harfouche from comment #24)
> Works On My Machine.
You were expected to add the updated RPM links on this report.
Please consider to remind if the no communication by one week.
Also
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3954
Nicolas Chauvet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4928
--- Comment #20 from leigh scott ---
(In reply to Richard from comment #18)
> (In reply to Nicolas Chauvet from comment #17)
> > It means that the 390xx serie can still be relevant from el6 to any recent
> > fedora.
> > As a side note, el7.6
2018-09-21 20:29 GMT+02:00 Sérgio Basto :
> On Tue, 2018-09-04 at 12:35 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>>
>> With the update gstreamer packages to 1.10.4 (that was due in RHEL
>> 7.4
>> already), the gstreamer1-libav package has bumped the requirement to
>> ffmpeg 3.X. So we are
2018-09-21 20:54 GMT+02:00 Sérgio Basto :
>
> I have one vm with epel 7 , have you any scratch build (or src.rpm) ?
> what you mean or where are "forwarded the patches" ?
The patches to compile ffmpeg 3.3 in el7 are available into the f27 branch.
So you can submit a scratch build for el7 based
On Fri, 2018-09-21 at 20:42 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2018-09-21 20:29 GMT+02:00 Sérgio Basto :
> > On Tue, 2018-09-04 at 12:35 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> > > Hi there,
> > >
> > >
> > > With the update gstreamer packages to 1.10.4 (that was due in
> > > RHEL
> > > 7.4
> > > already),
On Tue, 2018-09-04 at 12:35 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Hi there,
>
>
> With the update gstreamer packages to 1.10.4 (that was due in RHEL
> 7.4
> already), the gstreamer1-libav package has bumped the requirement to
> ffmpeg 3.X. So we are currently in a in-between state.
>
> There is also
26 matches
Mail list logo
