https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5155
leigh scott changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||leigh123li...@gmail.com
Le mer. 30 janv. 2019 à 05:04, Gergely Gombos a écrit :
>
> Hi RPMFusion devs,
>
> My name is Gergely Gombos. I've been using Fedora for about 1.5 years and I'm
> a software developer. I like the FOSS philosophy and using a lot of
> open-source software in the Javascript world, I'd like to make
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5155
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Chauvet ---
(In reply to leigh scott from comment #1)
> Package looks suitable for nonfree repo due to it's fdk-aac-devel
> BuildRequires
Indeed, please try to see if fdk-aac can be avoided, specially if this package
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5154
leigh scott changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30
Bug 30 depends on bug 5154, which changed state.
Bug 5154 Summary: Review request: libldac - LDAC library from AOSP
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5154
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5155
Bug 5155 depends on bug 5154, which changed state.
Bug 5154 Summary: Review request: libldac - LDAC library from AOSP
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5154
What|Removed |Added
Le mer. 30 janv. 2019 à 04:07, Michael Cronenworth a écrit :
>
> On 1/29/19 8:24 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> >
> > Please refrain from pushing any further updates until it can be tested.
>
>
> I have tested the update and I don't see any regressions. I've pushed a minor
> commit so
> that
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5154
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xav...@bachelot.org
--- Comment #4
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5154
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Chauvet ---
Having a quick look, it's possible that this library implement a patented algo
that Sony might provide only to licensee.
But this isn't clear if this is an evil patent, so please submit for review in
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5154
--- Comment #3 from Xavier Bachelot ---
Some comments :
-> The spec and SRPM URLs are incorrect. They need to point at the raw files.
%global debug_package %{nil}
-> We do want a debuginfo package. The build will take care of stripping the
Should not
https://www.vagrantup.com/docs/virtualbox/
"Vagrant comes with support out of the box for VirtualBox, a free,
cross-platform consumer virtualization product.
The VirtualBox provider is compatible with VirtualBox versions 4.0.x,
4.1.x, 4.2.x, 4.3.x, 5.0.x, 5.1.x, 5.2.x, and 6.0.x."
ср,
On 29. 01. 19 7:24, Vascom wrote:
Hi all.
I suggest to update VirtualBox package to version 6 for F29.
It works fairly stable with all virtual machines (tested by me and
some other people in F29).
Does this break Vagrant?
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Vagrant_2.2_with_QEMU_Session
On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 10:48 +0300, Vascom wrote:
> You mean update F29 to version 6 after F30 release?
no , after Vbox 6 in F29 updates stable , update F28 to Vbox 6 , after
Vbox 6 in F28 updates stable update el7
>
> вт, 29 янв. 2019 г. в 23:36, Sérgio :
> >
> > Maybe for all branches , we
Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: Switch to VirtualBox 6 in F29
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 06:43:33 -0500 (EST)
From: Pavel Valena
To: Miro Hrončok
CC: rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org, Vít Ondruch
- Original Message -
> From: "Miro Hrončok"
> To:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5154
--- Comment #5 from Gergely Gombos ---
Thanks a lot for your help!
I'm going to submit this to the main Fedora repos - #5155 will have to wait for
this one.
- using %cmake solved the debuginfo problems, now there is a proper debuginfo
package
On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 11:55 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 29. 01. 19 7:24, Vascom wrote:
> > Hi all.
> >
> > I suggest to update VirtualBox package to version 6 for F29.
> > It works fairly stable with all virtual machines (tested by me and
> > some other people in F29).
>
> Does this break
Hi Nicolas,
Thanks for the quick response!
First I'm going to submit 'libldac' to Fedora since the Bluetooth
package wouldn't build without it.
So you're saying that I will have to rename the package to
'pulseaudio-module-bluetooth-freeworld' or
'pulseaudio-module-bluetooth-nonfree'
17 matches
Mail list logo
