http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||musur...@gmail.com
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
--- Comment #40 from David Timms dti...@iinet.net.au 2009-01-01 00:13:36 ---
(In reply to comment #39)
[-] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming
Guidelines.
Use an %{alphatag} beginning with the date in
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289
Erik van Pienbroek erik-rpmfus...@vanpienbroek.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||erik-
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289
Erik van Pienbroek erik-rpmfus...@vanpienbroek.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||3
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289
--- Comment #2 from Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com 2009-01-01 20:17:25
---
(In reply to comment #1)
- This package is only useful in combination with win32 codecs. Are you (or
someone else) willing to package/maintain this for
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289
--- Comment #4 from Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at 2009-01-01 22:21:41
---
The w32codecs aren't legally distributable. I know some sites do it anyway, but
that doesn't mean it's legal. ;-)
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289
--- Comment #6 from Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at 2009-01-02 01:41:21
---
There's no license (at least not from the actual copyright holders) which would
allow distributing them. The default in copyright law is that distribution is
not
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|3 |4
--- Comment
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285
--- Comment #2 from Thorsten Leemhuis fed...@leemhuis.info 2009-01-02
15:29:54 ---
Created an attachment (id=67)
-- (http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=67)
Small improvements for VirtualBox-OSE-kmod.spec
Just a few notes (I
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
David Timms dti...@iinet.net.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||33
--- Comment #42
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=284
Alex Lancaster al...@users.sourceforge.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review request: picard- |Review
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=284
--- Comment #5 from Alex Lancaster al...@users.sourceforge.net 2009-01-02
22:27:50 ---
This should also be in the free section of the repo.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20
Thorsten Leemhuis fed...@leemhuis.info changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|2 |3
--- Comment
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20
--- Comment #8 from Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com 2009-01-03 14:35:31 ---
In part due to our prodding, the upstream has fixed the -fno-stack-protector
issue. When the new version is released with this fix (should be soon), I'll
update and
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=299
--- Comment #3 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2009-01-04 15:09:03 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Well, xine should move to Fedora instead,
+1 and I am willing to do the review :-)
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96
--- Comment #37 from Chris Nolan ch...@cenolan.com 2009-01-04 17:54:07 ---
(In reply to comment #36)
You have to install kmod-wl-PAE if you run a PAE kernel
But if one installs package broadcom-wl when running a PAE kernel it doesn't
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=299
--- Comment #1 from Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at 2009-01-04 14:21:41
---
Well, xine should move to Fedora instead, we've had xine-lib in Fedora for ages
so I really don't see why xine is still in RPM Fusion.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171
--- Comment #12 from Thorsten Leemhuis fed...@leemhuis.info 2009-01-04
18:57:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=69)
-- (http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=69)
mockup for a easier variant
Took a quick look at the GUI from
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96
Thorsten Leemhuis fed...@leemhuis.info changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289
--- Comment #7 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-rpmfus...@vanpienbroek.nl
2009-01-04 15:05:31 ---
Here's the review:
Please add an extra comment to the description mentioning this plugin requires
external win32 codecs which can't be
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=299
--- Comment #2 from Thorsten Leemhuis fed...@leemhuis.info 2009-01-04
14:34:31 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Well, xine should move to Fedora instead,
+1
we've had xine-lib in Fedora for ages
so I really don't see why xine is still in
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171
--- Comment #14 from Thorsten Leemhuis fed...@leemhuis.info 2009-01-04
20:10:03 ---
(In reply to comment #13)
Created an attachment (id=70)
-- (http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=70) [details]
Mockup of new interface
Looks
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171
--- Comment #16 from Stewart Adam s.a...@diffingo.com 2009-01-04 20:34:30 ---
(In reply to comment #14)
Which is not much useful, as the user can only use drivers that support the
installed hardware. IOW: even if he has a GPU that supported
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171
--- Comment #17 from Thorsten Leemhuis fed...@leemhuis.info 2009-01-04
20:54:54 ---
(In reply to comment #16)
(In reply to comment #14)
Most users won't be interested in this. They just want to use the
recommended
driver. Directly
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=300
Summary: Review request: pgadmin3 - Graphical client for
PostgreSQL
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=300
Manuel Wolfshant wo...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26
David Timms dti...@iinet.net.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=300
Manuel Wolfshant wo...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302
Summary: Review request: shorten - Fast, low complexity audio
compressor
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302
rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rc040...@freenet.de
--- Comment
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lemen...@gmail.com
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302
Felix Kaechele fe...@fetzig.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fe...@fetzig.org
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302
--- Comment #4 from Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at 2009-01-05 10:35:40
---
FFMpeg has an LGPLed decoder for Shorten.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=300
--- Comment #11 from Robert Scheck rpmfusion-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de
2009-01-05 18:16:01 ---
In Fedora it is not because of Artistic 1.0. So that makes it nonfree for
RPM Fusion?
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303
Summary: Review request: Mupen64Plus - A Nintendo64 Emulator
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: i386
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=300
--- Comment #12 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2009-01-05 18:31:01 ---
imo, yes, rpmfusions's definition of free is the same as fedora's, sans
patents.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171
--- Comment #19 from Thorsten Leemhuis fed...@leemhuis.info 2009-01-05
18:50:25 ---
(In reply to comment #18)
PackageKit integration is possible as well, but then that means that we will
have to ship all of the config files by default and
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=300
--- Comment #7 from Robert Scheck rpmfusion-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de 2009-01-05
16:35:09 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
Then there is some non-standard behaviour in pgadmin ... wxGTK apps are using
%{_localedir}. I will try to check that.
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303
--- Comment #8 from Juan Moreno uncholow...@gmail.com 2009-01-05 15:03:21 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
(In reply to comment #6)
I will make the proper changes and report back. Can you suggest a hosting
site?
Because you already have a
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303
--- Comment #5 from Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com 2009-01-05 12:15:07
---
(In reply to comment #4)
The application already installs a .desktop file itself. I will take a look at
the mupen64 srpm.
If that is the case, you are not
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303
--- Comment #3 from Juan Moreno uncholow...@gmail.com 2009-01-05 11:26:23 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Please be as kind as to NOT ignore the warning about the line too long. Proper
formatting helps in displaying properly in package
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171
--- Comment #21 from Thorsten Leemhuis fed...@leemhuis.info 2009-01-05
20:23:11 ---
(In reply to comment #20)
(In reply to comment #19)
Ehh, why? Just let each x11-xorg-drv-foo package create a small subpackage
x11-xorg-drv-foo-hwinfo
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289
--- Comment #10 from Allisson Azevedo allis...@gmail.com 2009-01-05 14:28:08
---
spec:
http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/gstreamer-pitfdll/gstreamer-pitfdll.spec
srpm:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302
--- Comment #6 from rc040...@freenet.de 2009-01-05 17:26:52 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #1)
This package seemingly is not 64bit clean:
...
I could provide a patch to hack around this issue, but ...
...
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=300
--- Comment #6 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2009-01-05 16:32:51 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
(In reply to comment #4)
You should remove the wxstd.mo files, they are distributed in the main wxGTK
package and then install pgadmin3.mo into
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=300
--- Comment #5 from Robert Scheck rpmfusion-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de 2009-01-05
16:18:13 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
You should remove the wxstd.mo files, they are distributed in the main wxGTK
package and then install pgadmin3.mo into
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=300
--- Comment #9 from Robert Scheck rpmfusion-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de 2009-01-05
18:06:32 ---
BTW, is pgadmin3 for RPM Fusion free or nonfree?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289
--- Comment #8 from Allisson Azevedo allis...@gmail.com 2009-01-05 12:51:10
---
Update package:
spec:
http://allisson.fedorapeople.org/packages/gstreamer-pitfdll/gstreamer-pitfdll.spec
srpm:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303
--- Comment #2 from Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com 2009-01-05 11:20:37
---
You are not providing a desktop file, which is mandatory for a GUI application:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files
Please also see
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171
--- Comment #22 from Thorsten Leemhuis fed...@leemhuis.info 2009-01-05
20:54:43 ---
(In reply to comment #21)
I'm jumping back and forth here, but I've scanned through the Gnome HIG and
it
would be acceptable to use a drop-down menu
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=269
David Timms dti...@iinet.net.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dti...@iinet.net.au
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171
--- Comment #23 from Stewart Adam s.a...@diffingo.com 2009-01-05 21:01:02 ---
(In reply to comment #21)
No; it IMHO definitely should be part of the driver package and completely
auto
generated there. Maintaining such a package manually
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303
--- Comment #4 from Juan Moreno uncholow...@gmail.com 2009-01-05 11:27:40 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
You are not providing a desktop file, which is mandatory for a GUI
application:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303
Manuel Wolfshant wo...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=300
--- Comment #3 from Robert Scheck rpmfusion-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de 2009-01-05
11:39:43 ---
Manuel, I've hunted down to the following now. But how to solve i18n issues?
The files can't be simply moved to %{_localedir}, because wxstd.mo
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=300
--- Comment #13 from Robert Scheck rpmfusion-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de
2009-01-05 22:35:13 ---
The following updated package should address all issues mentioned above and
more as well; rpmlint is silent for me when ignoring the license message.
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303
--- Comment #10 from Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at 2009-01-06 04:59:33
---
And for the optflags I am guessing I am supposed to split out a devel package?
No, you are supposed to make sure that the optimization flags contained in the
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171
--- Comment #26 from NicolasChauvet kwiz...@gmail.com 2009-01-06 10:08:01 ---
(In reply to comment #25)
I'm jumping back and forth here, but I've scanned through the Gnome HIG
Stop right here! GNOME is not the only desktop environment in
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171
--- Comment #27 from Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at 2009-01-06 12:13:25
---
GNOME HIG are guidelines every desktop environment can(should) follow.
No, they're guidelines specific to GNOME.
KDE has its own HIG:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208
David Timms dti...@iinet.net.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dti...@iinet.net.au
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19
--- Comment #29 from Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at 2009-01-06 13:40:08
---
Just use ExclusiveArch: i586 ppc ppc64 arm.
Or use i486 or i686 instead of i586, depending on how old stuff you want to
support, but the point is that one is
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303
Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||30
--- Comment
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=188
--- Comment #8 from Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com 2009-01-06 17:56:53
---
Can we close this bug as WONTFIX?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177
--- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org 2009-01-06 20:53:33 ---
IIRC my spec is largely based off of the Mandriva one. I'll take a look at the
other distros at some point.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=300
--- Comment #15 from Robert Scheck rpmfusion-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de
2009-01-06 23:04:46 ---
So the following would be approvable for you?
--- snipp ---
desktop-file-install --dir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/applications \
%if 0%{?rhel}
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=300
--- Comment #16 from Manuel Wolfshant wo...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-06
23:20:18 ---
I would add the Additional Category Database but yes, the command from
comment #15 would be fine from my point of view.
Assuming Dan has nothing else to
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=269
--- Comment #2 from Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-01-06 23:22:46
---
Thanks for the review. I will go over the issues asap.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19
--- Comment #31 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski r...@greysector.net
2009-01-06 23:51:51 ---
(In reply to comment #30)
Not directly related to this bug, but can someone give a brief explanation
what
i486, i586 are for? Is i686 good for
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32
--- Comment #3 from Felix Kaechele fe...@fetzig.org 2009-01-08 21:11:55 ---
Sorry for answering so late. I must have lost this somewhere in the back of my
mind.
Nevertheless I updated the SPEC (same link as above). Here is the new
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=308
Summary: Review request: ultrastardx - Karaoke game inspired by a
popular commercial karaoke game
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=300
Robert Scheck rpmfusion-bugzi...@linuxnetz.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=309
Summary: Review request: openttd - An open source
reimplementation of the game Transport Tycoon Deluxe
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=310
Summary: scid - A chess database application
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30
Mikhail Kalenkov mikhail.kalen...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||310
--
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=309
--- Comment #2 from Felix Kaechele fe...@fetzig.org 2009-01-09 10:04:49 ---
You are right. It would probably be best to wait for the next stable release
and then import it into Fedora.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=309
--- Comment #3 from Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com 2009-01-09 11:51:09 ---
And may be even better update this package to svn version and make package for
open graphics to submit them for review to fedora now?
Few notes regarding this
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=309
--- Comment #4 from Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com 2009-01-09 12:31:56
---
I don't see anything wrong in submitting this now to RPM Fusion and moving it
later to Fedora (with a quick review since the package should not have any
problems
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=309
--- Comment #7 from Oliver Falk oli...@linux-kernel.at 2009-01-09 13:40:22
---
(In reply to comment #6)
Oliver,
Unfortunately no, legally it could be get only by owners of original transport
tycoon game. That's why I'm suggesting to
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=309
Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||musur...@gmail.com
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=299
--- Comment #5 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2009-01-09 14:49:05 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
This application processes and displays the DVB-T/C/S... content.
From what I know, the video content is typically compressed using MPEG-2 and
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289
--- Comment #14 from Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org 2009-01-09 18:00:05 ---
So? It still needs w32codecs -- just because we cannot provide it does not mean
it is not a dependency for this package (to be at all useful).
--
Configure
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289
--- Comment #17 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-rpmfus...@vanpienbroek.nl
2009-01-09 20:49:19 ---
I just looked into autodownloader. Unfortunately this program is a non-root
program, so it can't write files to /usr/lib/codecs.
If we patch
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289
--- Comment #19 from Andreas Thienemann andr...@bawue.net 2009-01-09
21:07:22 ---
(In reply to comment #18)
Having a Requires: dependency on the w32 codecs makes this package not
installable on most systems.
This is surely not what is
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289
--- Comment #20 from Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org 2009-01-09 21:17:46 ---
No, there is actually a w32codec package floating around various places.
(Search for it on rpm.pbone.net.)
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289
--- Comment #21 from Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org 2009-01-09 21:18:35 ---
(Mine came from ATrpms, but it appears they no longer ship it.)
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289
--- Comment #23 from Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org 2009-01-09 21:42:32 ---
As opposed to not explicitly listing the dependency at all and expecting users
to somehow provide the pieces? How is that better?
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289
--- Comment #24 from Manuel Wolfshant wo...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-10
03:03:06 ---
(In reply to comment #23)
As opposed to not explicitly listing the dependency at all and expecting users
to somehow provide the pieces? How is that
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=310
Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||atork...@gmail.com
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289
--- Comment #25 from Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com 2009-01-10 13:57:29 ---
(In reply to comment #24)
What one can do is to apply Andreas's suggestion (i.e. ship the free bits),
own the directory were the codecs should land and
-
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=310
--- Comment #4 from Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com 2009-01-10 14:15:39 ---
Few notes about package itself:
- Package version should be like 3.7.0-0.12.beta3. Read more at
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=269
--- Comment #3 from Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-01-10 16:03:26
---
(In reply to comment #1)
[...]
Are these zero length files required for snowballz to work ?
Afaict yes. Removing them makes the game misbehave. I wonder why
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289
alsadi als...@ojuba.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||als...@ojuba.org
---
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289
--- Comment #27 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-rpmfus...@vanpienbroek.nl
2009-01-10 17:53:55 ---
(In reply to comment #26)
should we put something like
find /home -type d -name '.gstreamer-0.10' | xargs -r /bin/rm -rf
in %post
or in
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=269
--- Comment #4 from Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com 2009-01-10 18:28:58
---
(In reply to comment #3)
- is it normal to stick games in ../games/%{name} ? (Well I see fortune
and
torcs are, and frozen-bubble isn't so I guess I
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=269
--- Comment #5 from Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at 2009-01-10 18:51:53
---
/usr/games is obsolete in Fedora, I think the games still using it should be
fixed.
Isn't it obvious that it is a game? Also, we already used the word game in
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=269
--- Comment #6 from Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com 2009-01-10 19:02:17
---
I have some questions.
%{__python} setup.py install --skip-build --root %{buildroot} --install-lib
%{_datadir}/games/%{name}
Shouldn't install-lib be
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=289
--- Comment #28 from Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com 2009-01-10 19:56:55 ---
(In reply to comment #27)
No, that doesn't solve the problem. The problem is that the w32codecs need to
be installed before any gstreamer application is launched
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=310
--- Comment #5 from Mikhail Kalenkov mikhail.kalen...@gmail.com 2009-01-10
20:47:40 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Few notes about package itself:
- Package version should be like 3.7.0-0.12.beta3. Read more at
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=310
--- Comment #6 from Mikhail Kalenkov mikhail.kalen...@gmail.com 2009-01-11
11:50:34 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Also, license on scid/bases, scid/books and scid/sounds should be clarified.
scid/bases are GPL
scid/books/Elo2400.bin and
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=285
--- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-01-11 13:36:33 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Created an attachment (id=67)
-- (http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=67) [details]
Small improvements for
601 - 700 of 11874 matches
Mail list logo
