I have untagged the latest nvidia 304xx builds for f40+ due to gcc-14
build failure.
On 28/03/2024 21:17, Nicolas Chauvet via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
Le mar. 26 mars 2024 à 16:16, Nicolas Chauvet a écrit :
Hi there,
Just a reminder that the final freeze is in one week (and this
Why didn't the cunt inform us instead of wasting my fucking time!
On 26/03/2024 07:31, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski via
rpmfusion-developers wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 March 2024 at 01:44, Leigh Scott wrote:
commit 18bfd88a84df92c3efb1d7729eab367a85247230
Author: Leigh Scott
Date: Tue Mar
F40 build is also dropped.
I think we should also consider compat-ffmep4 future.
On 23/03/2024 13:04, Sérgio Basto wrote:
And in F40 ? compat-ffmpeg5 will be dropped also ?
On Sat, 2024-03-23 at 13:00 +0100, Leigh Scott wrote:
commit b9f004a649292480fd6649f0123ca275b4cad6f1
Author: Leigh
Kodi is in a pitiful state due to their stale code, version 20 isn't a
good fit for any current fedora release.
1: it needs a dead ffmpeg version, I had to drop nvdec support recently.
2: it isn't compatible with current python without patching.
3: because of 2# the downloaded plugins aren't
+1 for new kodi for f40+, maybe f39 can be added later.
-1 for adding GLES
On 12/03/2024 04:12, Michael Cronenworth via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
Hi all,
Kodi 21 has its first release candidate now available.
Key features:
- HDR (It works, I've tested it!)
- Better Pipewire support
-
I have untagged the FTI packages.
1: EmptyEpsilon
2: etlegacy
package: EmptyEpsilon-2021.06.23-6.fc40.x86_64 from
rpmfusion-nonfree-rawhide
unresolved deps (5):
libsfml-audio.so.2.5()(64bit)
libsfml-graphics.so.2.5()(64bit)
libsfml-network.so.2.5()(64bit)
It's probably due to the load from regen tasks currently running.
On 18/12/2023 13:01, Richard Shaw via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
I'm trying to do a pull on nonfree/unifi in master and it took about 3
minutes to complete.
Thanks,
Richard
___
I have untagged the broken build
$ koji-rpmfusion untag-build f38-free-updates-testing
shotcut-23.11.04-1.fc38
On 19/11/2023 10:15, Dan Horák via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
Hello,
seems the shotcut-23.11.04-1.fc38 build has been done with qt6 version
6.5 in the buildroot, but qt6 has
I have reassigned the task
$ koji-rpmfusion assign-task -f 614378 buildppcle-01.osuosl.rpmfusion.net
assigned task 614378 to host buildppcle-01.osuosl.rpmfusion.net
On 20/10/2023 13:12, Richard Shaw via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
I'm working on updating unifi but the f39 package seems to be
I have already worked around the koji issue.
https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/externalrepoinfo?extrepoID=168
On 18/08/2023 08:35, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
Le ven. 18 août 2023 à 09:08, Leigh Scott a écrit :
How does changing our proxy fix broken mock?
It will not fix mock, but it should
2023 à 08:46, Leigh Scott via rpmfusion-developers
a écrit :
You can't be serious, an empty repo doesn't count as working.
https://codecs.fedoraproject.org/openh264/40/x86_64/os/
I can workaround the problem in our proxy (to point to 39 until fixed).
I will remove open264 support from our
You can't be serious, an empty repo doesn't count as working.
https://codecs.fedoraproject.org/openh264/40/x86_64/os/
I will remove open264 support from our ffmpeg package if this fedora
repo isn't fixed by Monday, it doesn't bother me if I break the fdora
obs-studio package.
On
Test.
On 08/08/2023 15:31, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
no problem
I have already resubmitted the builds and they are completed
Thank you
On Tue, 2023-08-08 at 13:19 +, Andrew Bauer wrote:
Thanks Sergio. I just left town for work and will resubmit after i
return.
These are either retired,
Package: openmw
or moved to fedora.
Package: vo-amrwbenc
On 04/08/2023 03:15, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
Hi,
Mass rebuild for F39 is complete .
And we have this failures :
https://www.serjux.com/rpms/failed_to_build.html
Failed builds:
at 13:08 +0100, Leigh Scott via rpmfusion-developers
wrote:
Do we really need to keep this legacy player around?
Are you going to fix issues like this?
I will try , I like have a fallback
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6692
The bug was opened today
Upstream is virtually dead
Do we really need to keep this legacy player around?
Are you going to fix issues like this?
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6692
Upstream is virtually dead.
https://git.ffmpeg.org/gitweb/mplayer.git/shortlog
On 30/05/2023 11:09, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
I never enabled vaapi support by default, users need to enable that
themselves as chromium support for it is a mess.
Fedora chromium enables it by default.
Version Information
Data exported
2023-03-30T10:46:18.434Z
Chrome version
Chrome/111.0.5563.146
Operating system
Linux
I don't think a +2 release upgrade is a valid test case, I believe f37
is SHA256 signed.
On 19/02/2023 22:41, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
Hi,
I spent this weekend understanding why when update my vm to F38
branched I got a lot of [1] the key ID d651ff2e is "our" key
rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
Le ven. 10 févr. 2023 à 02:33, Leigh Scott via rpmfusion-developers
a écrit :
Too late, rpmfusion is branched,
On 08/02/2023 23:13, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
On Wed, 2023-02-08 at 12:56 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet via rpmfusion-
developers wrote
rpmfusion mass branching was completed yesterday.
On 10/02/2023 12:03, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
why is too late , I just notice we already got
https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/38/
so is just point our rawhide to f38 and do the mass rebuild , before
Too late, rpmfusion is branched,
On 08/02/2023 23:13, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
On Wed, 2023-02-08 at 12:56 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
As fedora has branched already ('or close'), here is the plan for
rpmfusion.
I'm proposing that we skip the
Here's the new list of packages with broken deps.
[leigh@mpd-pc ~]$ sudo repoclosure --releasever rawhide --disablerepo=*
--enablerepo=fedora,rpmfusion-free,rpmfusion-nonfree --check
rpmfusion-free --check rpmfusion-nonfree
Fedora rawhide - x86_64 6.2 MB/s | 66 MB 00:10
RPM Fusion for
I doubt there is enough freespace left on the harddrive for a mass
rebuild and branching, maybe kwizart can do a cleanup first.
On 08/02/2023 23:13, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
On Wed, 2023-02-08 at 12:56 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
As fedora has
You dropped the annobin fix when you rebased.
Fixed.
https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/free/kodi.git/commit/?id=cbdf249756ff02d2a463c94f01c5e5e543281c28
Build.
https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=24648
On 17/01/2023 17:14, Michael Cronenworth via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
On
--- Begin Message ---
I have zero interest in switching to gitlab and will bale if it is moved.
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
--- Begin Message ---
Your request was rejected either because you used the wrong namespace (rpm
isn't used) or you had whitspace.
Either of these make the request non-processable.
Perhaps you should check the packagedb before posting next time as I had to
process manually due to your screw up.
--- Begin Message ---
I have added a buildroot override for gstreamer1*-1.13.91
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
--- End
--- Begin Message ---
Sorry I have no interest in the VDR stack or the spare time.
1. Try filing the issue to vdr upstream.
2. Or try building it against compat-ffmpeg28
3. Or retire it as upstream is dead,
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list --
28 matches
Mail list logo
