Hi
Is anyone here using NetBeans and story runner? NB doesn't recognise .story
files so I can't even do simple things like block commenting lines (and the
regex replace is temperamental). I tried adding .story to the list of Ruby
file extensions, but then it just hides everything in the story
On 28/03/2008, Ashley Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is story runner having trouble matching stories when they are of the
following pattern?
A + B
A + X + B
A + Y + B
Came across this again, it also causes problems when the steps are of the
form
A
A + X
However, I found a (slightly
On Mar 31, 2008, at 7:03 AM, Ashley Moran wrote:
Hi
Is anyone here using NetBeans and story runner? NB doesn't
recognise .story files so I can't even do simple things like block
commenting lines (and the regex replace is temperamental). I tried
adding .story to the list of Ruby
Hey all! I'm loving Stories so far, but I ran across a difficult
error today that I felt should have resulted in a PENDING message.
Here's what I got:
/Users/Malohkan/Sites/blog/vendor/plugins/rspec_on_rails/lib/spec/
rails/../../../../rspec/lib/spec/story/runner/scenario_runner.rb:11:in
On 31/03/2008, Steve Rogers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a stories folder with files named blah_story.rb - and NetBeans
doesn't seem any stranger with those than it usually is.
Steve,
Sorry, I wasn't clear. It's not the my_story.rb file that's the problem,
it's the my_story.story file
Hi
I'm running RSpec and RSpec on Rails r, and autotest frequently - but
not consistently - fails on my after I change an individual model code file
file.
The error I get is this:
/usr/local/bin/ruby -S script/spec -O spec/spec.opts
spec/models/user_spec.rb
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Glenn Ford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all! I'm loving Stories so far, but I ran across a difficult error
today that I felt should have resulted in a PENDING message. Here's what
I got:
I sent a reply just a couple minutes later... to myself only :P Sorry
about that. Here what was I sent:
Here's a lighthouse ticket:
http://rspec.lighthouseapp.com/projects/5645-rspec/tickets/354-confusing-error-with-givenscenario
By the way I just realized I typo'd GivenStory in the subject
On 31/03/2008, Bart Zonneveld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having the same problem, also with controllers. Weird part is, I
mostly have it at work, running OS 10.4, but not at home, running
10.5. My environment is the same, except for the OS...
gr,
bartz
Hi bartz
What version of RSpec
Hi
Is there any way to do the following with stubs?
template.should_receive(:formatted_last_login).
with(duck_type(:last_login_date)).
any_number_of_times.
and_return { |user| last-login-#{user.id} }
If I change should_receive to stub!, Ruby
Hi Ashley,
I don't think Netbeans has support for plain text stories yet - but I'm not
certain (I was using it with frustration last night too). Probably better
to ask in the netbeans forum?
Cheers,
tim.
On 01/04/2008, Ashley Moran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 31/03/2008, Steve Rogers [EMAIL
On 31 Mar 2008, at 19:27, Tim Haines wrote:
I don't think Netbeans has support for plain text stories yet - but
I'm not certain (I was using it with frustration last night too).
Probably better to ask in the netbeans forum?
Hi Tim
I noticed it didn't have any out of the box support,
Hi Guys,
Just writing out a plain English story and was surprised to see one of my
steps wasn't listed as pending. It turned out it was because I had started
the line with and instead of And. Is there any reason why and shouldn't be
an alias for And?
Tim.
On Mar 31, 2008, at 4:53 PM, Tim Haines wrote:
Hi Guys,
Just writing out a plain English story and was surprised to see one
of my steps wasn't listed as pending. It turned out it was because
I had started the line with and instead of And. Is there any reason
why and shouldn't be an
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 6:06 PM, Chuck Remes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 31, 2008, at 4:53 PM, Tim Haines wrote:
Hi Guys,
Just writing out a plain English story and was surprised to see one
of my steps wasn't listed as pending. It turned out it was because
I had started the
Cool.I didn't know about and and Ruby. :-)
thanks!
On 01/04/2008, Chuck Remes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 31, 2008, at 4:53 PM, Tim Haines wrote:
Hi Guys,
Just writing out a plain English story and was surprised to see one
of my steps wasn't listed as pending. It turned out
I don't know how the plain text stories are parsed, but would it be
reasonable to expect that if they are plain text rather than ruby, then
lower case 'and' could be used interchangeably? Is consistency really
required here? I'm thinking I would like other people writing stories for
me in the
On Mar 31, 2008, at 6:29 PM, Tim Haines [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know how the plain text stories are parsed, but would it be
reasonable to expect that if they are plain text rather than ruby,
then lower case 'and' could be used interchangeably? Is
consistency really required
Hi there,
A couple of complete newb questions here.
Should I be spec'ing the existence of attributes on models? While reading
through the docs and googling I haven't seen any example that checks if
attributes exist on a model. i.e. Game.Description.
Likewise, what I've seen on spec'ing
Hi Tim,
I'm just a newb too, but as I understand it, you should only spec code
you write. In the case of attributes on models, it's ActiveRecord
code. You shouldnt need to test that. I have not been doing this.
That said, I'd love to get the word from some people that have been
doing it
Hey Matt,
Cheers for that. Yeah - I'm not speccing methods like save, valid?, errors
etc.. I am writing belongs_to though, so figure that should be specced
somehow. I guess when I'm adding a description field to something, I
might be writing a migration for it, but no other model code. I
I have been using the following approach. Looking forward to see if
anyone else does something better to test associations ...
describe Profile Associations do
it should belong to ... do
Profile.should_receive(:belongs_to).with(:account)
load
And just to argue with myself a little - the spec output is a pretty nice of
how a model works. Perhaps I'm thinking that something for the description
should be specced so that it appears in the spec output..
Looking forward to taking this newb hat off sometime soon - I'm definitely
spending
It looks like my first note didn't go through ... so I apologize if it
is delayed and this is a duplicate. My colleagues and I have been
testing associations like this ...
it should have one account do
Profile.should_receive(:has_one).with(:account)
load profile.rb
end
We like
for associations, among other things, i've been using http://rspec-on-
rails-matchers.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/README
linoj
On Mar 31, 2008, at 8:33 PM, Anthony Broad-Crawford wrote:
I have been using the following approach. Looking forward to see
if anyone else does something better to
Is there an easy way to stub an instance method for every new instance of a
given class? I suppose I could just redefine the method, but I'm wondering
if the RSpec mocking framework has this built in.
___
rspec-users mailing list
26 matches
Mail list logo
