Hi,
I noticed recently that require 'rspec' on my machine was taking close
to half a second. That's not a huge amount of time, but it is still
the single slowest part of my test suite.
It boils down to Ruby 1.9's rather slow require. I'm using 1.9.3, but
I'd still like to shave off some of the
Cheers David, I've been waiting patiently for this release :)
I think I might wait for a rainy day until I upgrade though (I'm not using
autotest btw)..
1469 examples, 62 failures
It's good to see you (and the rest of the team) give credit where credit is
due. I was half expecting the
be integrated into Rcov somehow.
Scott
On Jul 25, 2007, at 12:27 PM, Marcus Ahnve wrote:
Really cool - I have asked myself that question several times.
/Marcus
On 7/25/07, Ian Leitch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey list,
RSpec is great, I've been using it at work for a couple of months
Hey list,
RSpec is great, I've been using it at work for a couple of months now. One
gripe I have is that I find it hard to know exactly to what extent my code
is covered by the specs. I am aware of RCov and Heckle; they're great, but
I'd like to demonstrate another perspective of coverage
