Re: [rspec-users] Reorganize documentation for Cucumber at Github

2009-01-23 Thread aslak hellesoy
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 2:24 AM, aslak hellesoy aslak.helle...@gmail.comwrote: On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 1:34 AM, aslak hellesoy aslak.helle...@gmail.comwrote: On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 10:10 PM, Tom Cloyd tomcl...@comcast.net wrote: Fernando Perez wrote: Hi, I actually just noticed

Re: [rspec-users] Reorganize documentation for Cucumber at Github

2009-01-23 Thread aidy lewis
Hi On 23/01/2009, aslak hellesoy aslak.helle...@gmail.com wrote: 18) How to use Cukes with non-Ruby platforms (Watir family, I will gladly put something together on Cucumber and Watir. Aidy ___ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org

Re: [rspec-users] Reorganize documentation for Cucumber at Github

2009-01-23 Thread aslak hellesoy
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 12:14 PM, aidy lewis aidy.le...@googlemail.comwrote: Hi On 23/01/2009, aslak hellesoy aslak.helle...@gmail.com wrote: 18) How to use Cukes with non-Ruby platforms (Watir family, I will gladly put something together on Cucumber and Watir. Be my guest! Please

Re: [rspec-users] Reorganize documentation for Cucumber at Github

2009-01-19 Thread James Byrne
Aslak Hellesøy wrote: . On the other hand, I don't have time or even desire to create a wiki that is as good as the GitHub wiki and put it on cukes.info. My only addition is that there is nothing preventing a community effort to add a standard navigation page to the front of the Cucumber

Re: [rspec-users] Reorganize documentation for Cucumber at Github

2009-01-18 Thread Andrew Premdas
I'd just like to point out that the Github wiki tool is somewhat challenged by a project with so much good documentation like cucumber has. The lack of search, and the layout is really poor. Might it be better to host a more able wiki on another site, and use the github wiki to point to this

Re: [rspec-users] Reorganize documentation for Cucumber at Github

2009-01-18 Thread aslak hellesoy
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 12:01 AM, Fernando Perez li...@ruby-forum.comwrote: Andrew Premdas wrote: I'd just like to point out that the Github wiki tool is somewhat challenged Yeah I also think that the github wiki is showing its limits. It works when the project only requires a few pages of

[rspec-users] Reorganize documentation for Cucumber at Github

2009-01-17 Thread Fernando Perez
Hi, I actually just noticed that Cucumber has plenty good documentation on its wiki at github. But the problems are: - The homepage is badly designed as it doesn't really outline an order to read other pages - It is impossible to make the difference between internal links to the wiki and links

Re: [rspec-users] Reorganize documentation for Cucumber at Github

2009-01-17 Thread Tom Cloyd
Fernando Perez wrote: Hi, I actually just noticed that Cucumber has plenty good documentation on its wiki at github. But the problems are: - The homepage is badly designed as it doesn't really outline an order to read other pages - It is impossible to make the difference between internal links

Re: [rspec-users] Reorganize documentation for Cucumber at Github

2009-01-17 Thread Tom Cloyd
aslak hellesoy wrote: On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 10:10 PM, Tom Cloyd tomcl...@comcast.net mailto:tomcl...@comcast.net wrote: Fernando Perez wrote: Hi, I actually just noticed that Cucumber has plenty good documentation on its wiki at github. But the

Re: [rspec-users] Reorganize documentation for Cucumber at Github

2009-01-17 Thread Tom Cloyd
aslak hellesoy wrote: On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 1:34 AM, aslak hellesoy aslak.helle...@gmail.com mailto:aslak.helle...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 10:10 PM, Tom Cloyd tomcl...@comcast.net mailto:tomcl...@comcast.net wrote: Fernando Perez wrote: Hi,

Re: [rspec-users] Reorganize documentation for Cucumber at Github

2009-01-17 Thread Tom Cloyd
aslak hellesoy wrote: Ok, I'll give a stab at what a 5 minute introduction might contain. Please comment. 1) Who should use Cucumber, and what benefits can you get from it? 2) How Cucumber works (high level explanation without getting too technical). 3) Learn the nomenclature - features,