On Jul 26, 2010, at 3:44 pm, Wincent Colaiuta wrote:
> Personally I wouldn't do this. It makes it harder for anybody coming to your
> project to understand what's going on, because they see this "contract 'foo'
> do" construct and don't know what it is unless they dig into your
> spec_helper.
El 26/07/2010, a las 14:09, Ashley Moran escribió:
> The solution I'm playing with is to extract shared contract (ie shared
> example groups) that you can mix into a spec for a host class (eg User,
> Checklist) above to prove the feature (here collections) works, without
> reference to the impl
On Jul 26, 2010, at 8:55 am, Wincent Colaiuta wrote:
> Seems to me that including the same shared example group twice in the same
> "describe" block is a bit of an abuse, to be honest. I don't think it was
> ever really intended to be used in that way.
You're right, it clearly wasn't intended
El 26/07/2010, a las 09:31, Ashley Moran escribió:
> I'm back again, and still on a quest to tame shared example to do my bidding.
> This time what I'm wondering is... is there any way to format shared example
> specdoc description output with data passed in with #let, or otherwise? eg:
> How
