On 4 Jun 2008, at 15:14, Matt Mower wrote:
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 3:06 PM, David Chelimsky
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rails 2.1 supports plugins from git.
Yep 2.1 and I used script/plugin to install from git this time. That's
new again to me since I've been using piston for quite a while (or
s
HI Scott.
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 3:05 AM, Scott Taylor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's a general idea with rspec (and one which probably isn't present in
> other testing frameworks) that says that testing *should* influence your
> design. I'm sure this is one of the reasons that David consid
Hi, imagine there's a class called Egg which has the following method
(which calls another method):
def do_thing
has_iterated = false
self.each_row do |row|
has_iterated = true unless has_iterated
end
has_iterated
end
Stupid code, I know.
I have two questions with it. The first is
On Jun 4, 2008, at 9:05 PM, Scott Taylor wrote:
There's a general idea with rspec (and one which probably isn't
present in other testing frameworks) that says that testing *should*
influence your design.
This isn't really a framework issue - it's about TDD. Remember that
BDD started off as
On Jun 5, 2008, at 5:07 AM, Matt Mower wrote:
Does your patch work? I wasn't clear whether David was saying that
it doesn't.
The patch works but is incomplete and duplicates a bunch of code. You
should probably be able to use it as/is for what you need.
Cheers,
David
_
Hi,
I am using the 'spec/story' module with Fire(Watir).
Is there additional logging?
I don't want to do this:
Then "the resultant links are displayed with the search text in each
description" do
browser.links.each do |lnk|
if lnk.id =~ /programmeLink/
lnk.click
sle
Use xml_http_request in your stories rather than xhr. I believe the "xhr"
method is aliased to the wrong method... I haven't looked to see if this is
a Rails issue or a rspec-rails issue,
Zach
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 1:33 AM, Mikel Lindsaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Getting a strange error.
> I
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 5:46 AM, Doug Livesey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have two questions with it. The first is, would it be possible to set
> it up to test the case when each_row operates on an empty Array?
If there were no rows, each_row wouldn't yield at all, so you should
just be able to
I have a story that executes the following (as an example to show the
bug I'm experiencing):
--
Given "I have a fake post saved" do
@postCount = Post.find(:all).length
@post = Post.new
@post.employee_id = 123
@post.name = "Name of th
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 1:39 AM, Zach Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Use xml_http_request in your stories rather than xhr. I believe the "xhr"
> method is aliased to the wrong method... I haven't looked to see if this is
> a Rails issue or a rspec-rails issue,
>
Thanks, that worked.
Mikel
__
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 03:37 -0500, David Chelimsky wrote:
> I believe this is now fixed in
> http://github.com/dchelimsky/rspec/commit/2b474ac
> .
>
> If any of you can still reproduce this, please let me know.
I tracked this down on Wednesday to the same code. However, this patch
doesn't quit
Why am I getting this error if running from Netbeans or just from command
line with executing blah_spec.rb? If I run with spec bla blah blah_spec.rb
then it's fine.
.
Finished in 0.264 seconds
1 example, 0 failures
c:/ruby/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rspec-1.1.4/lib/spec.rb:27:in `exit?':
undefined
12 matches
Mail list logo
