We are trying to automate the running of our rspec tests for our Rails app
on a build server using Capistrano. The problem is that Capistrano seems to
think that the command called to run the model tests failed when in fact I
believe it succeeded. I believe the problem has to do with the return
Sometimes I don't have a full need to make a class to do something,
yet I want something readable and concise. This is influenced from the
joys of JavaScript.
Today I made this happen. Love it, like it, hate it, WDYT?
Spec::Story::Runner.register_listener FunctionalStruct.new(
:run_started =
2008-08-12 20:25, Zach Dennis:
Sometimes I don't have a full need to make a class to do something,
How's that _essentially_ different from making a class or extending an
existing class? I am not knowledgeable enough to just see it, and
becaus I can't understand the motivation, I'm bound to hate
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 12:24 AM, Tero Tilus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008-08-12 20:25, Zach Dennis:
Sometimes I don't have a full need to make a class to do something,
How's that _essentially_ different from making a class or extending an
existing class? I am not knowledgeable enough to
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 9:54 PM, Zach Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is nothing wrong with this, but there are times when it feels
dirty and unnecessary to create yet another class with some methods
The proposed solution looks very nice, but I've never been convinced by the
yet
