On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 9:54 PM, Zach Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is nothing wrong with this, but there are times when it feels > dirty and unnecessary to create yet another class with some methods The proposed solution looks very nice, but I've never been convinced by the "yet another class" argument. It's not like you're only allowed a certain number. That hasn't always been the case, however. When I worked at Sierra On-Line in the early '90s, I broke the compiler of our proprietary OOP language because I exceeded its maximum class count. Those were the days...:) ///ark
_______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users