support rails 2 and I'm using rails 2.
> Sorry about the lack of the information in my report.
No apology necessary. There are a couple of projects in the works to make rspec
2 work with rails 2, but I don't think any are ready for general consumption.
> Cheers,
> Nori
>
>
On Jan 14, 2011, at 9:56 AM, Michael Guterl wrote:
> I keep seeing strange run times for our specs:
>
> Finished in -348317500.25314 seconds
>
> Any thoughts are much appreciated.
Are you stubbing Time.now anywhere?
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-
On Jan 15, 2011, at 9:45 AM, Lille wrote:
> Thanks Nick, that was helpful.
>
> I'm wondering if it's possible to test module behavior and then test
> that the module behavior of interest is invoked from the before/after
> filter enclosing the controller action under test.
>
> To me, it seems tha
On Jan 16, 2011, at 1:35 PM, andyl wrote:
> For easy editing, I love one-line specs, like this:
>
> specify { 1.should == 1 }
>
> But when using '--format documentation', one-line specs don't always
> render useful documentation.
>
> A solution is to write one-line specs using do/end:
>
> it
On Jan 16, 2011, at 4:47 PM, Rich Price wrote:
> I was using rspec 2.4.0 to test some code
> and it was working fine then suddenly I get
>
> rich@richlaptop2:~/Documents/fakemap/rspec$ rspec block.rb
> /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31:in `gem_original_require':
> ../code/fmutil.rb
On Jan 16, 2011, at 5:52 PM, Wilker wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I launched some days ago a new project that aims to make the use of mocks
> safer.
> This is the URL of project: https://github.com/wilkerlucio/aidmock
>
> The basic idea is to make user define interfaces of classes, when user
> defines t
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 4:07 AM, Rob Aldred wrote:
> Hi, I'm refactoring some specs, in controller specs I have a before(:each)
> which sets up things required in the session, wanted to avoid duplication and
> put the initial setup global for each controller spec
>
> my before filter is...
>
> c
On Jan 17, 2011, at 12:40 PM, Joe Van Dyk wrote:
> Is there a way to always use integrate_views for all controller specs?
> I hate having to remember to insert that line into each one.
# rspec-rails-1
Spec::Runner.configure do |c|
c.integrate_views
end
# rspec-rails-2
# Doc'd on
http://relish
On Jan 16, 2011, at 8:29 PM, Evan wrote:
> 1) Know of any guides to writing performance tests using Rspec?
There's nothing built in as of yet, but you can do this pretty easily:
require 'benchmark'
RSpec::Matchers.define :take_less_than do |n|
chain :seconds do; end
match do |block|
On Jan 17, 2011, at 10:16 AM, David Kahn wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Ants Pants wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> From what I've seen, this type of question doesn't really seem to get an
> answer on this list as most of the replies relate to failures of RSpec. If
> this is the case, where
On Jan 13, 2011, at 3:53 PM, SpringChicken wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've just spent a day trying to write up a basic update spec for a
> nested resource - all without avail. I'm quite new to RSpec & not sure
> what I'm doing wrong. I can't seem to get a stub that recognises the
> required associati
Hi all,
Since the release of rspec-2.0, I've been following Rubygems' rational
versioning [1] as closely as possible. Patch releases (2.4.x) have only had bug
fixes, and minor releases (2.x.0) have had new features, but no (intentionally)
backward incompatible changes, which should require a ma
On Jan 18, 2011, at 11:08 AM, Rick DeNatale wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 9:15 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Since the release of rspec-2.0, I've been following Rubygems' rational
>> versioning [1] as closely as possible. Patch release
nterface, like:
>
> Aidmock.double(Interface)
>
> but I mean your is cooler, and user will be able to apply mocks/stubs directly
>
> I will work on it today :)
>
> Thanks
> ---
> Wilker Lúcio
> http://about.me/wilkerlucio/bio
> Kajabi Consultant
> +55 81 8
you have been asking for some sort of
auditing tool for mocks that tell you when you're mocking stuff that doesn't
exist, and Wilker here is finally offering a workable solution. Feedback,
please :)
Cheers,
David
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 7:12 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
>
On Jan 20, 2011, at 8:17 AM, vishnu wrote:
> Hi
> inside an after :each block, whats the best way to find out if the
> current spec has run?
If you're in an after block, the current spec has run. No need to query
anything.
> Right now the only solution I have is
> self.example.instance_variab
On Jan 21, 2011, at 4:57 AM, Rob Westgeest wrote:
> On Nov 22 2010, 9:42 pm, LesFreeman wrote:
>> On Sep 28, 10:42 pm, Amiruddin Nagri wrote:
>>
>>> I am having asharedexample'allow authorized actions' for my Rails 3 RSpec
>>> 2.beta.20 application. Thesharedexamplelooks like
>>
>>> share_exam
On Jan 19, 2011, at 3:53 PM, Sean McCleary wrote:
> I keep getting the error every time I try to run my specs with "bundle
> exec rake spec":
>
> /Users/sean/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p0/gems/rspec-core-2.4.0/lib/rspec/
> core/option_parser.rb:18:in `parse!': invalid option: --autotest
> (OptionParser
On Jan 21, 2011, at 4:43 AM, poseid wrote:
> On Jan 16, 10:46 am, poseid wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am trying to get going with development of view components with
>> Rspec2 and Rails3.
>> However, I make the following observation, and I don't understand what
>> is going on, and how to fix this.
>>
On Jan 19, 2011, at 6:48 AM, Rick DeNatale wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 1:31 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 18, 2011, at 11:08 AM, Rick DeNatale wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 9:15 AM, David Chelimsky
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi a
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Luis Lavena wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:15 AM, David Chelimsky
> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> I think the right thing to do is to rely on the autotest plugin, but I also
>> think that this would require a 3.0 release,
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Andrew Premdas wrote:
> On 21 January 2011 13:56, David Chelimsky wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 19, 2011, at 6:48 AM, Rick DeNatale wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 1:31 PM, David Chelimsky
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>
On Jan 21, 2011, at 10:32 AM, JDeville wrote:
> I'd like to be able to test w/ this methodology, and i'm having
> trouble figuring out where to hook in to rspec to do it. Near as I
> can tell, the flow is this:
>
> run all of the before filters in the order of highest to lowest
> context
>
> <<
On Jan 22, 2011, at 6:50 PM, Andrew Premdas wrote:
> ]On 22 January 2011 09:47, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 5:13 PM, Andrew Premdas wrote:
> > On 21 January 2011 13:56, David Chelimsky wrote:
> >>
> >> On Jan 19, 2011, at 6:48 AM, Rick DeNa
On Jan 22, 2011, at 5:30 PM, Andrew Dangerfield wrote:
> I am a new to ruby and rails and am trying to refactor some code with
> rspec and have run into a problem that has stumped me for a few days and
> I have searched google and ruby/rails forums to no avail so I really
> hope somebody can help
On Jan 26, 2011, at 7:34 AM, Rob Aldred wrote:
> I'm having a bit of trouble stubbing out a method on a model which has some
> quite specific behaviour.
> Basically I want to check the method returns something different after ive
> called update_attributes
>
> eg.
>
> @exam.draft? (returns tr
On Jan 26, 2011, at 3:03 PM, John-Mason P. Shackelford wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> What is the difference between rspec --tty and rspec --color. I just
> noticed that under JRuby output for --color is not colored but for --
> tty it is. Seems like we only need one color option, why two?
The --tty o
On Jan 26, 2011, at 8:43 AM, vishnu wrote:
> Hi
> I use the ci_reporter gem for builds on my CI machine (hudson).
> Prior to rspec 2.4, environment options would override commandline
> options. So the gem used this to change the formatter and require its
> files.
>
> In 2.4, that order has bee
On Jan 27, 2011, at 7:48 AM, Michael Guterl wrote:
> We have moved from Rails 2 to 3 and the changing Mailer syntax has
> caused us to rewrite some of our specs.
>
> In Rails 2:
>
> Implementation:
> Mailer.deliver_job_application(job.id, user.id)
>
> Spec:
> Mailer.should_receive(:deliver_j
On Jan 27, 2011, at 4:34 PM, James Almond wrote:
> I was looking at the Relish documentation for RSpec today and noticed there
> are a few missing bits. For example, the expectation raise_error can take a
> block which the raised error gets passed to. This is not documented in the
> Relish feat
On Jan 27, 2011, at 5:11 PM, John Feminella wrote:
> That's not quite right. :each runs before _each_ spec, while :all runs
> once, before _any_ spec.
Perhaps :any is a better name? We could add it as an alternative for the same
as :all. WDYT?
> --
> John Feminella
> Principal Consultant, BitsB
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 8:53 PM, Rick DeNatale wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 6:16 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
>> On Jan 27, 2011, at 5:11 PM, John Feminella wrote:
>>
>>> That's not quite right. :each runs before _each_ spec, while :all runs
>>> once, befo
On Jan 26, 2011, at 4:06 AM, Josep M. Bach wrote:
> A while ago, I was looking at Minitest's benchmarking capabilities (contained
> in a single file here) and I thought it would be great to have an equivalent
> in RSpec. They have methods to assert type of performance (linear,
> exponential...)
On Jan 26, 2011, at 10:07 AM, Fregas wrote:
> I have a spec where I need to check that the order of 2 method calls
> to 2 different mocks is correct:
>
> mock_customer.should_receive(:save).ordered
> mock_customer.should_recieve(:id).and_return(1).ordered
Don't think it's related, but receive is
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Doug Bryant
wrote:
> I'm currently running into the same issue and can find very little about it
> on the interwebs - i.e. an individual test run with `script/spec` works fine
> but the same test without any code changes fails when run as part of the
> suite via `r
On Jan 30, 2011, at 3:48 AM, Jason Nah wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I have emailed before about the inconsistencies I'm spotting when using named
> routes/resource, but I think I've narrowed down the issue. It would seem this
> has nothing to do with rspec per se, but more with how routing works with
On Jan 30, 2011, at 6:00 AM, Evgeniy Dolzhenko wrote:
> On 1/30/2011 2:00 PM, Tom H. wrote:
>> Evgeniy Dolzhenko wrote in post #978481:
>>> Do you need the full source code of an example in the log output, or
>>> just a description?
>> Just the description would be good so I can match up the log e
On Jan 30, 2011, at 9:34 AM, Rick DeNatale wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 9:09 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
>> You can either use mock_model or mock_stub
>
>
> David,
>
> Did you mean to say stub_model rather than mock_stub?
Yes :)
___
On Jan 30, 2011, at 5:53 PM, Jason Nah wrote:
> On 31 January 2011 04:33, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Jan 30, 2011, at 9:34 AM, Rick DeNatale wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 9:09 AM, David Chelimsky
> > wrote:
> >> You can either use mock_model or mock_stub
Hey all,
There is a feature request for rspec-core that I'd like to see some opinions
about. The idea is to be able to reference subjects and methods defined with
let() in parent groups from within the subject() and let() methods in a child
group. Two approaches are to use super or a block argu
On Jan 31, 2011, at 3:38 AM, Evgeniy Dolzhenko wrote:
> Btw. there is also before(:suite), and working from there wouldn't it make
> sense to have
>
> 1. before(:suite)
> 2. before(:group)
> 3. before(:example)
>
> which would reflect the hierarchy of RSpec run (i.e. suite > group > example).
On Feb 1, 2011, at 3:40 AM, James OBrien wrote:
> hey, thanks for reading:
>
> I have a problem which can be reduced to this,
>
> from within an example of mine I call the helper 'expect_call' which is
> defined thus:
>
> def expect_call(hash)
> obj.should_receive(:some_
> method).with(hash
On Feb 1, 2011, at 4:23 PM, Kurt wrote:
> I've started a chart of differences between RSpec 1 and 2 here:
> http://snyderscribbles.blogspot.com/2011/01/rspec-2-changes-from-rspec-1.html
>
> I'll gladly post any new discoveries anyone want to contribute.
It would be great if you would contribute
, and a lot of the Rails framework changed as well. And don't
forget bundler. There are a lot of moving parts here, so if you can isolate the
slow down to RSpec, please let us know what you find so we can address any
specific issues.
Thanks!
David
> On Jan 13, 11:11 am, David Chelimsk
On Feb 3, 2011, at 9:28 AM, David Kahn wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Scott Taylor wrote:
>
> Probably manually rescuing your debugger call would work:
>
> begin
> debugger
> rescue Exception
> end
>
> Thanks, I just tried this but no go, the rspec still trips and fails me out.
> M
On Feb 3, 2011, at 11:04 AM, David Kahn wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:32 AM, David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Feb 3, 2011, at 9:28 AM, David Kahn wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Scott Taylor wrote:
>>
>> Probably manually rescuing your debug
rspec-core-2.5.1 is released!
[full changelog](http://github.com/rspec/rspec-core/compare/v2.5.0...v2.5.1)
This release breaks compatibility with rspec/autotest/bundler integration,
but does so in order to greatly simplify it.
With the release of rspec-core-2.5.1, if you want the generated
RSpec-2.5.0 is released!
This is a minor upgrade, and is fully backward compatible with rspec-2.4. It
includes several bug fixes, enhancements, and one deprecation. See the
changelog below for details.
We had a little glitch publishing the docs to
[http://relishapp.com/rspec](http://relishapp.
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 6:24 PM, Trenton Scott wrote:
> >From my Rails project directory in Terminal, I'm able to run 'bundle
> exec rspec spec/' and it works successfully. When I try and run
> 'autotest', however, I get the error(s) below. Note: my .autotest file
> has require 'autotest/growl' and
On Feb 8, 2011, at 4:14 AM, Matt Wynne wrote:
>
> On 4 Feb 2011, at 09:30, Alan B wrote:
>
>> Hi all, I'm trying to create a custom matcher that will visit a given
>> path and check it's authenticated.
>> Here's what I have so far (using rspec-rails and capybara):
>>
>> matcher :require_authen
Hey all,
Looking for thoughts on a feature/pull request:
https://github.com/rspec/rspec-core/pull/306.
Cheers,
David
___
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
On Feb 10, 2011, at 12:40 PM, Frederick Cheung wrote:
> I'm new using rspec, so please forgive me if I'm barking up the wrong tree,
> but...
>
> I'd expect this to pass (using rspec 2.5.1)
>
> describe 'stub_chain' do
> it "returns expected value from two chains with hash" do
>subject = O
On Feb 10, 2011, at 6:29 PM, James Martin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been coming up with some documentation examples, which I'd like
> to contribute as Cucumber features to go into the relishapp.
>
> I started following the contribute instructions on the rspec-dev
> README[1] but have a question abou
On Feb 12, 2011, at 1:10 AM, Fearless Fool wrote:
> I have a Premise model with lots of validations and somewhat complex
> callbacks. I've already written tests for those (and they pass).
>
> I also have a MeteredService model for which premise :has_many
> metered_services and (of course) meter
On Feb 11, 2011, at 7:51 AM, Frederick Cheung wrote:
> On Feb 10, 7:30 pm, David Chelimsky wrote:
>> On Feb 10, 2011, at 12:40 PM, Frederick Cheung wrote:
>>
>>> I'm new using rspec, so please forgive me if I'm barking up the wrong tree,
>>> but...
&
On Feb 12, 2011, at 5:55 PM, David Chelimsky wrote:
>
> On Feb 11, 2011, at 7:51 AM, Frederick Cheung wrote:
>
>> On Feb 10, 7:30 pm, David Chelimsky wrote:
>>> On Feb 10, 2011, at 12:40 PM, Frederick Cheung wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm new using
On Feb 9, 2011, at 9:36 PM, Robert Poor wrote:
> I'm a new (and complete) convert to RSpec, especially when coupled with
> autotest.
>
> I notice when automate processes my entire spec directory it takes about
> eight minutes. I have many more tests to add before I'm done, so eventually
> I'l
Hey all,
There is a feature request that would break compatibility for some rspec suites
using older conventions. I'm in favor of adding the feature in 3.0 release when
we get there, but would appreciate hearing from those that would be
inconvenienced by this change. Please comment in the issue
On Feb 14, 2011, at 7:08 PM, Kane Baccigalupi wrote:
> We have had a really great integrated javascripting testing in our very
> large, very javascripty Sinatra application. Our testing setup uses a
> custom version of harmony (http://github.com/baccigalupi/harmony), that
> reduces the out of cont
On Feb 14, 2011, at 20:20, Kane Baccigalupi wrote:
> David Chelimsky wrote in post #981651:
>
> I am happy to get back to you about the documentation a little later. I
> want to take the time to fully describe the problems we had.
Much appreciated.
>
>> Please let me
On Feb 14, 2011, at 21:53, Kane Baccigalupi wrote:
> Kane Baccigalupi wrote in post #981670:
>
>> We can try a global, but it isn't an ideal situation.
>
> So, we did replace @dom with $dom. That meant we could go back to doing
> no manual garbage collection, and in fact we didn't even have to
On Feb 15, 2011, at 9:11 AM, Andrei Maxim wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm working on Rails 3 application with ActiveRecord and ActionMailer
> stripped out (I've commented out the respective lines in
> config/application.rb), but I'm running into some problems when I'm running
> the specs either via t
On Feb 15, 2011, at 11:43 PM, Trenton Scott wrote:
> I keep getting an issue when running RSpec with Autotest. My
> ~/.autotest file looks like this:
> Any thoughts on what I'm doing wrong?
> ==ERROR BEGINS==
> bundle exec /Users/TTS/.rvm/rubies/ruby-1.9.2-p136/bin/ruby -S /
> Users/
> TTS/.rvm
On Feb 20, 2011, at 8:12 PM, Samantha John wrote:
> I am new to rspec.
Welcome!
> I followed a few tutorials and set it up to test my
> existing rails project. I ran the rspec generators and created
> spec/user_spec.rb to test my user.rb model.
>
> The user.rb file starts with:
>
> class User
On Feb 22, 2011, at 8:35 PM, Jason Nah wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I'm running the following stack:
> rails 3.0.4
> rake (0.8.7)
> rspec 2.5.0
> rspec-rails 2.5.0
> I created the rails app, and I didn't tell rails to exclude the default Test
> mechanisms.
>
> I installed it using
>
> rails generate rs
On Feb 23, 2011, at 9:29 AM, Tom Milewski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When I run 'rspec spec/models' everything runs beautifully.
> When I run 'rspec spec/controllers' everything also runs beautifully.
> When I run 'rspec spec' the models seem to forget that the records
> need to pass the validations bef
On Feb 24, 2011, at 11:55 AM, Fearless Fool wrote:
> I'm baffled. If I do:
>
> $ bundle exec ruby -S rspec --tty A_spec.rb
> $ bundle exec ruby -S rspec --tty B_spec.rb
>
> I get no errors. But then if I do:
>
> $ bundle exec ruby -S rspec --tty A_spec.rb B_spec.rb
>
> I get an error o
On Feb 24, 2011, at 12:36 PM, Fearless Fool wrote:
> A little additional information: every time I run the tests, it creates
> a new PremiseGroup model. Shouldn't the db get rolled back between
> tests?
>
> Here is PremiseGroup, listed here in its entirety:
>
> class PremiseGroup < ActiveRec
On Feb 24, 2011, at 12:58 PM, Fearless Fool wrote:
> David Chelimsky wrote in post #983690:
>>> RESIDENTIAL = self.create(:name => "residential")
>> ^^ this is probably the problem ^^
>> ...
>
> Ah! got it. FWIW, I wrote a query to the Rails gr
On Feb 24, 2011, at 8:09 PM, Wilson Bilkovich wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Ross Kaffenberger wrote:
>> Anyone have rspec-2 working with rails 2.3.x? We're looking at this route as
>> an incremental step towards upgrading to rails 3.
>> I saw David C mention in the rpec-2 release note
On Feb 25, 2011, at 4:19 PM, Radhesh Kamath wrote:
> Craig Demyanovich wrote in post #983991:
>> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Radhesh Kamath
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Which version of rspec-rails should I use for Rails 2.3.8?
>>
>>
>> rspec-rails 1.3.3 is currently the latest release for Rails 2.3.x
On Mar 1, 2011, at 4:27 AM, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi,
> We are using omniauth for signup through Facebook and twitter.
> Is there any way i can check this by rspec controllers since it contains
> callbacks n all..so i think we may have to use mock models.
> If there is any link or documentation p
I'm very pleased to announce the reformation of a core RSpec development team:
Chad Humphries, a.k.a. spicycode, has been involved with RSpec since the 1.0
release, which he helped to usher out the door at RailsConf 2007. He
subsequently authored Micronaut [1], a lightweight, RSpec compatible sp
On Mar 2, 2011, at 11:49 AM, Andrea Reginato wrote:
> Hi, I'm having some strange behavior on callbacks when testing with
> RSpec2. On my test, when I create a resource using the #create method
> the callbacks related to #before_create are not called. If I go to the
> console and I try to type the
On Mar 3, 2011, at 1:36 AM, Jiang Guimin wrote:
> Hi,
> I hava a controller
>
> class DynamicFlowsController < ApplicationController
>
> def create
> @workflow = Workflow.find_by_id(params[:workflow_id])
> table = @workflow.flex_table
> save_u_and_node(table, @workflow.node_de
On Mar 3, 2011, at 11:44 PM, Jason Nah wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I'm trying to get the ruby debugger to breakpoint at a specific line in
> source.
>
> Here's what I did:
> Added require "ruby-debug" in spec_helper.rb
You don't need this ^^.
> Added gem dependency to Gemfile (gem "ruby-debug"
> In the
On Mar 1, 2011, at 2:59 PM, Daniel Kehoe wrote:
> All the RSpec installation instructions I've seen (except the RSpec
> Book) say something like:
>
> Set up the RSpec generator by adding the following to config/
> applicaton.rb:
> config.generators do |g|
> g.test_framework :rspec
> end
>
> Or
On Mar 1, 2011, at 7:33 PM, Lakshmanan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am upgrading a rails 2.1.0 app to Rails 3. Before I started my migration, I
> wrote all the tests cases for my app in Rspec 1.x version.
>
> I am doubting whether rspec test cases written in 1.x version will work when
> my app starts ru
On Mar 4, 2011, at 9:53 PM, Mario Aquino wrote:
> I have a tricky problem with running rake spec in a Rails 3.0.3
> project (using rspec-2.5.0, rspec-rails and rake 0.8.7). It may be
> that this mailing list is not the correct one to ask for help, but I
> am hoping that it is. When I run 'rake s
On Mar 8, 2011, at 8:10 AM, Amit Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying to run rspec testcase using webrat but it is showing me an
> error as "undefined method `last_response' for #"
>
> Following are my configurations:
> Gemfile:
>
> roup :development, :test do
> gem 'sqlite3-ruby', :require => 's
On Mar 10, 2011, at 7:49 AM, Mohnish J. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am a newbie to Rails 3 and Rspec. Kindly excuse my being a novice.
>
> I am trying to use RSpec with Rails 3. I am using rails 3.0.3 and ruby
> 1.9.2 on ubuntu 10.04 os.
>
> I am currently referring to the tutorial on :-
> http://www.r
On Mar 7, 2011, at 1:30 AM, DBA wrote:
> Hello guys,
>
> I was just starting a rails 3.0.5 application with rspec-rails 2.5.0
> and ruby 1.9.2-p180 and when I went to describe my controller I ran
> into this undefined method 'get' error.
>
> Here's the spec that is causing the problem (which li
On Mar 9, 2011, at 6:00 AM, Magnus Erickson wrote:
> Hi,
> Is there a way to detect if an example has failed? Something like a:
> "example_failed?" method.
> In my case I need to dump some information, i.e trace and error log, to be
> used when analyzing what
> went wrong in the example. I'm thi
I tried something similar and worked fine with or without
render_views, so I really have no idea why you're experiencing that.
Please file a bug report to
https://github.com/rspec/rspec-rails/issues and be sure to include
version numbers of Ruby, Rails and RSpec.
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 9:39 PM, N
I think the problem is a missing API in FakeFS:
http://rubydoc.info/gems/fakefs/0.3.1/FakeFS/File
http://www.ruby-doc.org/core/classes/File.html#M24
On Mar 13, 2011, at 2:37 PM, Nicholas Wieland wrote:
> hi Scott, thanks for the answer.
>
> https://gist.github.com/868356
>
> I'm not even c
On Mar 15, 2011, at 4:49 AM, Shamaoke wrote:
> On 14 мар, 03:16, Myron Marston wrote:
>> On Mar 11, 1:17 pm, Justin Ko wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 2:32 AM, Shamaoke wrote:
Hi.
>>
Why doesn't the following filter work?
>>
~~~
# encoding: utf-8
# ./ex
On Mar 15, 2011, at 5:25 AM, Magnus Erickson wrote:
>
> 2011/3/13 David Chelimsky
> On Mar 9, 2011, at 6:00 AM, Magnus Erickson wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > Is there a way to detect if an example has failed? Something like a:
> > "example_failed?" method.
> &
On Mar 15, 2011, at 10:57 AM, niku -E:) wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm using ruby1.9.2 and rspec2.5.1
> I want to use "expect{}.to change().from().to()" like this
>
> https://gist.github.com/870897
>
> When Int class, it passed.
> When Ary class, it failed.
>
> Why was Ary test failed and How do I pass
On Mar 17, 2011, at 8:24 PM, Pete Campbell wrote:
> Justin Ko wrote in post #988060:
>
>> I would say "count_me" is not returning what you think it is. Try adding
>> "raise count_me.inspect" in the controller action to see if this is the
>> case.
>
> Thanks for the feedback. The code snippet isn
On Mar 15, 2011, at 10:27 AM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
> Using the 'new' way of defining custom matchers explained here:
> https://github.com/dchelimsky/rspec/wiki/Custom-Matchers
>
> I'm having trouble figuring out how to write a custom matcher that yields an
> object to a block where more mat
On Mar 18, 2011, at 10:37 AM, Srushti Ambekallu wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I would like to be able to be able to have mocks where I can make all the
> calls and assert that it was called afterwards. This would be especially
> useful when asserting on a doing-method whose return value is not being
>
On Mar 21, 2011, at 5:41 AM, Kai Schlamp wrote:
> My ApplicationController exposes a method (e.g. sort_direction) to the
> view templates by using
> helper_method :sort_direction.
> I then use this method in another method (e.g. sort_link) in a view
> helper (application_helper.rb).
>
> When test
On Mar 21, 2011, at 8:40 AM, Kai Schlamp wrote:
>> This error ^^ suggests that sort_direction is being called on the example
>> itself rather than the helper object. Please post the spec so we can see
>> what's going on.
>
> Sure ...
>
> describe ApplicationHelper do
> describe "order link"
On Mar 21, 2011, at 11:19 AM, Kai Schlamp wrote:
>> Change this ^^ to this:
>>
>> helper.fetch_param(:order)
>
> I was wrong the test fails also with the same error message:
>
> Failure/Error: order_link(:name)
> NoMethodError:
> undefined method `fetch_param' for #<#:
> 0xb63be118>
On Mar 21, 2011, at 11:15 AM, Kai Schlamp wrote:
>>> module ApplicationHelper
>>> def order_link(column, title = nil)
>>>fetch_param(:order)
>>
>> Change this ^^ to this:
>>
>> helper.fetch_param(:order)
> Ok, the tests now runs fine, but unfortunately the site itself doesn't
> work anym
On Mar 21, 2011, at 12:52 PM, Kai Schlamp wrote:
>>> Failure/Error: order_link(:name)
>>> NoMethodError:
>>> undefined method `fetch_param' for #<#:
>>> 0xb63be118>
>>
>> That's not the same error message you posted earlier:
>>
>> NoMethodError:
>> undefined method `sort_directio
On Mar 22, 2011, at 4:13 AM, Tom Stuart wrote:
> On 19 Mar 2011, at 13:35, David Chelimsky wrote:
>
>> On Mar 18, 2011, at 10:37 AM, Srushti Ambekallu wrote:
>>
>>> Hey all,
>>>
>>> I would like to be able to be able to have mocks where I can m
On Mar 22, 2011, at 7:50 AM, Thibaut Barrère wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I could not find an easy solution to this question: how can I properly
> test an Rails controller action?
>
> We were trying to run the following test:
>
>get :show, :id => 'hello'
>response.should redirect_to("http://www.go
On Mar 20, 2011, at 11:38 PM, andyl wrote:
> OK - I got this working using mocha and the 'any_instance' method.
>
> A gist with working examples is here: https://gist.github.com/879029
>
> It looks like rspec mocks had an 'any_instance' method, but it was removed
> because it promoted 'bad pr
On Mar 23, 2011, at 8:03 AM, Michael Guterl wrote:
> Is it possible to retrieve the example that is currently running?
describe "an example" do
it "knows itself as example" do
example.description.should eq("knows itself as example")
end
end
__
1001 - 1100 of 3589 matches
Mail list logo
