Dear List,
When I use access function to find out if the folder exist in rsync
code. I found that it's will NOT act as normal function.
I have tried 2 test:
a) embedded in rsync function int recv_files(int f_in, char
*local_name) and hard coded with following line.
Really weird!
root folder is OK, but others returned -1. Why?
I'm in recv_files access / ret = 0
I'm in recv_files access /home ret = -1
I'm in recv_files access /home/admin ret = -1
I'm in recv_files access /home/admin/test ret = -1
Thoese folder does exist. I use rsync --daemon to launch the
On Fri 22 May 2009, Daniel.Li wrote:
When I use access function to find out if the folder exist in rsync
code. I found that it's will NOT act as normal function.
I have tried 2 test:
a) embedded in rsync function int recv_files(int f_in, char
*local_name) and hard coded with following
On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 10:47 +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
On Fri 22 May 2009, Daniel.Li wrote:
When I use access function to find out if the folder exist in rsync
code. I found that it's will NOT act as normal function.
I have tried 2 test:
a) embedded in rsync function int
On Fri 22 May 2009, Daniel.Li wrote:
On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 10:47 +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
access(/home/admin/test,F_OK)
Result: Failed with -1, just mean the test folder is NOT existed, but it
does exist.
Perhaps at that point rsync has chroot()ed somewhere else?
I
Hello,
Suppose that every day cron runs this:
rsync -a --times --delete $HOME /my/backups/dir/latest
In general, rsync will only update a file if it has been modified. Now,
imagine that one of the files becomes corrupted in the backup directory,
but the timestamp hasn't changed. Will rsync
On Fri 22 May 2009, Daniel Carrera wrote:
In general, rsync will only update a file if it has been modified. Now,
imagine that one of the files becomes corrupted in the backup directory,
but the timestamp hasn't changed. Will rsync detect this?
Not in the usual case.
You may want to
Hello Daniel
The default check is the time of last modification and size so if your
corruption also leaves the file size the same the file will not be
included for update.
You can use the --checksum option that also checks the file contents but
this will significantly increase your disk
On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 13:10 +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
On Fri 22 May 2009, Daniel.Li wrote:
On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 10:47 +0200, Paul Slootman wrote:
access(/home/admin/test,F_OK)
Result: Failed with -1, just mean the test folder is NOT existed, but it
does exist.
Hello,
I have previously mailed on list that I am trying to port rsync to NT. I was
wondering that whether CRC can be used to find check sums rather then
rolling algorithm. I havnt found any document on web comparing rolling
algorithm with CRC.
--
hasanatka...@gmail.com
I hate Capitalism,so
On 22.05.2009 13:43, Daniel Carrera wrote:
Hello,
Suppose that every day cron runs this:
rsync -a --times --delete $HOME /my/backups/dir/latest
In general, rsync will only update a file if it has been modified. Now,
imagine that one of the files becomes corrupted in the backup
Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote:
Exactly.
But you can (periodically) add -c, then rsync while checksum the whole
content of all files.
Thanks. I'll add a -c for the Saturday backup.
But IF you have (or suspect) such type of corrution, you have have an
even greater problem: Your hardware is
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Hasanat Kazmi hasanatka...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I have previously mailed on list that I am trying to port rsync to NT. I was
wondering that whether CRC can be used to find check sums rather then
rolling algorithm. I havnt found any document on web comparing
Ryan Malayter wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Hasanat Kazmi hasanatka...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I have previously mailed on list that I am trying to port rsync to NT. I was
wondering that whether CRC can be used to find check sums rather then
rolling algorithm. I havnt found any
Hasanat Kazmi wrote:
Hello,
I have previously mailed on list that I am trying to port rsync to NT. I was
wondering that whether CRC can be used to find check sums rather then rolling
algorithm. I havnt found any document on web comparing rolling algorithm with
CRC.
It will only find
Hi All
We want to use rsync to backup a live Berkley db to a remote site. BDB
has a requirement that read has to be in the unit of db page size. So
wonder how could we make sure that rsync can follow that? If we need
to change the code, where we should begin to look at? Thanks!
Ming
--
Please
On 22.05.2009 16:25, Ming Zhang wrote:
Hi All
We want to use rsync to backup a live Berkley db to a remote site. BDB
has a requirement that read has to be in the unit of db page size. So
wonder how could we make sure that rsync can follow that? If we need
to change the code, where we should
it become a BDD question now.. ;)
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Matthias Schniedermeyer m...@citd.de wrote:
On 22.05.2009 16:25, Ming Zhang wrote:
Hi All
We want to use rsync to backup a live Berkley db to a remote site. BDB
has a requirement that read has to be in the unit of db page
18 matches
Mail list logo
