3.1.3 not building on OS 10.14

2019-04-12 Thread Robert DuToit via rsync
Hi all, I have been using v 3.1.1 for some time which builds fine. Just tried v3.1.3 and getting this error at make: rsync.c:623:40: error: too few arguments to function call, expected 4, have 2 if (cmp_time(sxp->crtime, file_crtime) != 0

very slow performance OS X xattrs

2017-01-13 Thread Robert DuToit
Hi All, I am have been cloning drives with several versions of xcode and am seeing very long copy times. Perhaps just because of xcode I am noticing the change. Xcode of course has many files (400,000+) many xattrs and compressed bits, decmpfs… so only natural it will be slow but sometimes upw

Re: Why is my rsync transfer slow?

2016-01-26 Thread Robert DuToit
Just chiming in here, I haven’t read all the previous posts so may be repeating… Mike Bombich has a good piece on benchmarks for various source/destination scenarios with rsync. https://bombich.com/kb/ccc3/how-long-should-clone-or-backup-take Note that copying to sparsebundle on local media is

Re: rsync 3.1.1 wrong transfer of app packages using --backup

2015-01-25 Thread Robert DuToit
16 PM, Robert DuToit wrote: > Dear All, > > I found a workaround for the corrupted backup app package files though there > is probably a more intelligent way. > > When the destination is empty or missing (rather than an update) > > rsync.c calls make_backup and returns

Re: rsync 3.1.1 wrong transfer of app packages using --backup

2015-01-22 Thread Robert DuToit
* is more efficient than forcing a copy for larger files when no hard- * linking is possible. */ On Jan 16, 2015, at 9:41 AM, Robert DuToit wrote: > Dear All, > > I have been seeing some strange behavior using rsync 3.1.1 on OSX with the 3 > standard patches applied w

Re: 3.1.1 wrong transfer of app packages using --backup

2015-01-19 Thread Robert DuToit
following this path is difficult. Thanks, Rob On Jan 16, 2015, at 9:41 AM, Robert DuToit wrote: > Dear All, > > I have been seeing some strange behavior using rsync 3.1.1 on OSX with the 3 > standard patches applied when using the --backup and --backup-Dir options. >

wrong transfer of app packages using --backup

2015-01-16 Thread Robert DuToit
Dear All, I have been seeing some strange behavior using rsync 3.1.1 on OSX with the 3 standard patches applied when using the --backup and --backup-Dir options. This works as expected on 3.0.9, moving any files on dest that are not on source to the backup folder. If no changes then the backup

Re: delete not working with multiple source directories

2014-08-17 Thread Robert DuToit
ultiple sources. > > On 08/16/2014 09:10 PM, Robert DuToit wrote: >> Hello All, >> >> I have lately heard from a couple of people that delete option was >> not deleting extraneous files on destination. This only happens >> when there are several source directories

Re: delete not working with multiple source directories

2014-08-16 Thread Robert DuToit
: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Does --relative fix it? You almost always want --relative with > multiple sources. > > On 08/16/2014 09:10 PM, Robert DuToit wrote: >> Hello All, >> >> I have lately heard from a couple of people that delete opti

delete not working with multiple source directories

2014-08-16 Thread Robert DuToit
Hello All, I have lately heard from a couple of people that delete option was not deleting extraneous files on destination. This only happens when there are several source directories and at destination some show delete working and others not. I can not reproduce the issue so it is hard to pin

Re: --log-file=File output

2014-03-12 Thread Robert DuToit
t specifier for file count. thanks, Rob > > On 03/12/2014 08:04 AM, Robert DuToit wrote: >> >> On Mar 12, 2014, at 12:21 AM, Kevin Korb >> wrote: >> >> -v would be %n%L You probably don't want --progress in a log file. >> >>> It works g

Re: --log-file=File output

2014-03-12 Thread Robert DuToit
d as in progress. If possible I may try to channel the progress to the logfile- I havn’t been able to find the place in the source that displays the (xfer#8, to-check=1115/1125) or if that is even possible. But this is a big improvement at least. Rob > On 03/12/2014 12:20 AM, Robert DuToit

Re: --log-file=File output

2014-03-11 Thread Robert DuToit
xperiment with those. Thanks Kevin, rob > > On 03/12/2014 12:20 AM, Robert DuToit wrote: >> Thanks Kevin, >> >> On Mar 12, 2014, at 12:10 AM, Kevin Korb >> wrote: >> >> See --log-file-format Most of the info for it is in man >> rsyncd.conf since it i

Re: --log-file=File output

2014-03-11 Thread Robert DuToit
d just want the stdout format with —progress -v. Maybe there are some simple examples out there. Rob > > On 03/12/2014 12:02 AM, Robert DuToit wrote: >> Hi All, I have a situations where I need output to a file and >> normally would just append “&>output.log” to the rsync c

--log-file=File output

2014-03-11 Thread Robert DuToit
Hi All, I have a situations where I need output to a file and normally would just append “&>output.log” to the rsync command line but can’t do that in this situation and need to run rsync with just the args via nstask. I tried the internal --log-file=File option which works except it outputs ve

Re: Rsync 3.1.0 failing [iobuf] on MacOSX 10.8.5 (was Re: Cannot build rsync 3.1.0 on MacOSX 10.8.5 with fileflags patch)

2013-10-12 Thread Robert DuToit
On Oct 12, 2013, at 7:11 AM, Dmitry Yu Okunev wrote: > Hello, people. > > On 10/12/2013 02:56 PM, Robert DuToit wrote: >> >> On Oct 12, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Anthony Morton wrote: >> >>>> I got 3.1 to build all right on OS X but it won't run with

Re: Rsync 3.1.0 failing [iobuf] on MacOSX 10.8.5 (was Re: Cannot build rsync 3.1.0 on MacOSX 10.8.5 with fileflags patch)

2013-10-12 Thread Robert DuToit
On Oct 12, 2013, at 12:36 AM, Anthony Morton wrote: >> I got 3.1 to build all right on OS X but it won't run without stalling and >> lots of errors. Is it working for you or anyone else yet or have the >> problems come to light? > > Yes, now I'm using it in anger I'm seeing several fatal erro

Re: Cannot build rsync 3.1.0 on MacOSX 10.8.5 with fileflags patch

2013-10-11 Thread Robert DuToit
Hi Tony, I got 3.1 to build all right on OS X but it won't run without stalling and lots of errors. Is it working for you or anyone else yet or have the problems come to light? Best, Rob On Oct 11, 2013, at 7:06 PM, Anthony Morton wrote: >> However, attempting to build the new 3.1.0 rel

Re: pre 1 OSX errors

2013-08-03 Thread Robert DuToit
On Aug 3, 2013, at 12:31 PM, Wayne Davison wrote: > On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Robert DuToit wrote: > Hi Wayne, > > Trying out 3.1 pre 1 on OSX 10.8.4 > > I like the new extended stats and the ir-chunk file numbers in log. Also > getting a lot of errors and most

pre 1 OSX errors

2013-07-31 Thread Robert DuToit
Hi Wayne, Trying out 3.1 pre 1 on OSX 10.8.4 I like the new extended stats and the ir-chunk file numbers in log. Also getting a lot of errors and most copies not completing to local disk. rsync just stalls. Standard osx build: patch -p1 https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before po

rsync: unpack_smb_acl: sys_acl_get_info(): Unknown error: 0 (0)

2013-06-08 Thread Robert DuToit
Dear All, I have been getting reports and noticing these acl errors again recently. rsync 3.0.7 thru 3.0.9. Someone reported that files were being skipped but we don't know if it is the acl issue since it doesn't state the file name. In the archives I found Henry's post about this and saw that

Re: Patches for OS X.

2012-05-14 Thread Robert DuToit
Hi Tony, > fileflags and crtimes and hfs-compression patches applied That should do it. It comes up perfect for me on the Bbouncer tests with those three patches. Mike will speak for himself, but He has done some tweaking with other patches he made to customize the build for Carbon Copy Cloner.

unpack_smb_acl() errors

2011-10-23 Thread Robert DuToit
Hi All, I have been noticing this in stderr recently. Is this a problem? Standard OSX patches on 3.0.7 - everything working perfectly otherwise. Best, Rob Calling unpack_smb_acl() on "/Users/astrid" Calling unpack_smb_acl() on "/Users/astrid/Desktop" Calling unpack_smb_acl() on "/Users/astr

Re: 3.0.8 OSX build hfs+ patch failing

2011-04-09 Thread Robert DuToit
Thanks Wayne, That's great - I didn't even think to look in patches for those! I'll build and send it around for testing. best, Rob On Apr 9, 2011, at 12:00 PM, Wayne Davison wrote: > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:11 PM, Robert DuToit wrote: >> I am just building 3.0.8

3.0.8 OSX build hfs+ patch failing

2011-04-05 Thread Robert DuToit
Hi all, hi Mike, I am just building 3.0.8 on osx 10.6.6 and mike's hfs_compression.diff is failing. Am I missing something? Thanks, Rob patch -p1 https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Re: osx 10.6 strange rsync errors

2011-02-27 Thread Robert DuToit
Hi Vernon, I don't know why I didn't think of that - I was telling people to exclude all . files! Thanks. I wonder if this is foolproof enough to create a patch since it seems to be an ongoing bug with OS releases. Best, Rob On Feb 24, 2011, at 4:54 AM, Ira Cooke wrote: > I've recently encou

Re: osx remote backup wrong permissions

2010-11-04 Thread Robert DuToit
Hi All, On Oct 31, 2010, at 5:12 PM, Wayne Davison wrote: > On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Robert DuToit wrote: > Does the server (or other computer in this case) always need a root account > established for this to work? I tried everything else and the owner always > became

Re: osx remote backup wrong permissions

2010-10-31 Thread Robert DuToit
On Oct 31, 2010, at 5:12 PM, Wayne Davison wrote: > On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Robert DuToit wrote: > Does the server (or other computer in this case) always need a root account > established for this to work? I tried everything else and the owner always > became that o

Re: osx remote backup wrong permissions

2010-10-31 Thread Robert DuToit
the remote user. Cheers, Rob On Oct 30, 2010, at 9:35 PM, Robert DuToit wrote: > > On Oct 30, 2010, at 8:27 PM, Mike Bombich wrote: > >> >> On Oct 30, 2010, at 9:02 AM, Robert DuToit wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I'm trying a rem

Re: osx remote backup wrong permissions

2010-10-30 Thread Robert DuToit
On Oct 30, 2010, at 8:27 PM, Mike Bombich wrote: > > On Oct 30, 2010, at 9:02 AM, Robert DuToit wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I'm trying a remote backup for the first time. It is between two laptops, I >> installed rsync 3.0.7 on both compiled >>

osx remote backup wrong permissions

2010-10-30 Thread Robert DuToit
Hi All, I'm trying a remote backup for the first time. It is between two laptops, I installed rsync 3.0.7 on both compiled patch -p1 https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

re: OSX 10.6.4 error with -R option

2010-08-29 Thread Robert DuToit
Hi again, Problem solved Sorry. I didn't even think to check permissions on the Desktop folder, the first logical thing to check. Somehow they had been changed. Fixed them and -R works fine now. I believe other users are likely having permissions issues too. Thanks, Rob -- Please use reply-

OSX 10.6.4 error with -R option

2010-08-29 Thread Robert DuToit
Hi All, I have had reports of problems with the -R option on OSX 10.6.4. Just tested it myself and found this odd result: When I run this "dtruss -f path/to/rsync -aHAXNR --fileflags --force-change --protect-decmpfs --stats -v /Users/astrid/Documents/main.m /Users/astrid/Desktop/rrr it pr

Re: osx 10.6 strange rsync errors

2010-07-07 Thread Robert DuToit
Hi All, I reported a ways back about strange file replication via rsync copying to an OSX 10.6.3 local network volume. Hidden dot files such as .DS-Store and other "dot" files on OSX were copied to the local volume with appended names indicating that the temp files created by rsync were endin

Re: rsync and hfs+ compressed files damaged

2010-07-01 Thread Robert DuToit
s issue. > > As an aside, the patch contains a couple bug fixes to the xattr code as well. > I'll break those out and submit them separately in the near future. > > Mike > > > > > On Jul 1, 2010, at 6:16 AM, Robert DuToit wrote: > >> Hi Mike and All,

Re: rsync and hfs+ compressed files damaged

2010-07-01 Thread Robert DuToit
Hi Mike, on the first build try I got a make error: patch -p1 https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Re: rsync and hfs+ compressed files damaged

2010-07-01 Thread Robert DuToit
out and submit them separately in the near future. Mike On Jul 1, 2010, at 6:16 AM, Robert DuToit wrote: Hi Mike and All, I have been doing some research on the damaged HFS compressed files and found some interesting clues. Looking at mike's patch so far I can't find any reas

Re: rsync and hfs+ compressed files damaged

2010-07-01 Thread Robert DuToit
e's hfs patch. Thanks, Rob On Jun 25, 2010, at 4:03 PM, Mike Bombich wrote: > Can you share the steps required to reproduce this? I've seen two reports of > this but have not been able to reproduce it myself, and the users that > reported it also could not reproduce it

Re: rsync and hfs+ compressed files damaged

2010-06-25 Thread Robert DuToit
been able to reproduce it myself, and the users that > reported it also could not reproduce it. > > Mike > > On Jun 25, 2010, at 5:16 AM, Robert DuToit wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I have been using rysnc 3.0.6 with Mike's >> rsync_3.0.6-hfs-compre

rsync and hfs+ compressed files damaged

2010-06-25 Thread Robert DuToit
Hi All, I have been using rysnc 3.0.6 with Mike's rsync_3.0.6-hfs-compression_20091027.diff patch (as well as the standard osx patches) with good results. I discovered that clones done on 10.6 using this rsync cause some executable files ( the ones that are mostly compressed this way on osx )

Re: OSX and HFS+ filesystem compression

2010-05-19 Thread Robert DuToit
rved >Sub-test: UF_COMPRESSED flag ... set >Sub-test:file contents ... match >Sub-test:creation time ... ok >Sub-test:modification time ... ok >Sub-test: hard link inode ... ok >Sub-test: hard link decmpfs xattr ... preserved >

Re: OSX and HFS+ filesystem compression

2010-05-18 Thread Robert DuToit
Hi Mike, I guess I did something wrong or removing that line 283 in proto.h was critical I ran fileflags and crtimes patches first and then rsync_3.0.6-hfs-compression_20091027.diff but the test shows no go. Sub-test: decmpfs xattr ... not preserved Sub-test: UF_COMPRESSED flag ... not set Th

Re: OSX and HFS+ filesystem compression

2010-05-18 Thread Robert DuToit
Hi Mike, Thanks so much After some searching I just found the patch and built on 3.0.6 but got an error on make after running fileflags.diff, crtimes.diff and your patch perl ./mkproto.pl ./*.c ./lib/compat.c In file included from ./rsync.h:971, from ./rounding.c:20: ./proto.h

OSX and HFS+ filesystem compression

2010-05-18 Thread Robert DuToit
Hi All, I have been reading about the HFS+ filesystem compression on Snow Leopard and how copying or cloning over system files with rsync and other tools results in them being expanded on destination. I was wondering if there was any thoughts on updating rsync to accommodate this? It is kind of

Re: Count of files to be transferred

2010-04-30 Thread Robert DuToit
On Apr 30, 2010, at 8:26 PM, Ryan Joseph wrote: > > On May 1, 2010, at 6:58 AM, Robert DuToit wrote: > >> I don't know if this is what you are looking for but I have a GUI for rsync >> (Backuplist+) and now use unix "find directoryPath | wc -l" and it is v

Re: Count of files to be transferred

2010-04-30 Thread Robert DuToit
Hi All, On Apr 30, 2010, at 5:29 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote: > On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 14:21 +0700, Ryan Joseph wrote: >> On Apr 30, 2010, at 12:54 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote: >>> Rsync determines which of the files in the file list need a data >>> transfer as it goes, so the only way to get the count

Re: osx 10.6 strange rsync errors

2010-04-07 Thread Robert DuToit
10.5 box to send but all users are reporting issues with all 10.6.3 machines) basic Mac options path/to/rsync -aHAXN --fileflags --force-change -stats - src dst output Rob On Apr 7, 2010, at 5:59 AM, carson+rs...@taltos.org wrote: > Robert DuToit wrote: > > On Apr 6, 2010, a

Re: osx 10.6 strange rsync errors

2010-04-07 Thread Robert DuToit
On Apr 7, 2010, at 5:59 AM, carson+rs...@taltos.org wrote: > Robert DuToit wrote: >> On Apr 6, 2010, at 9:14 AM, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, Robert DuToit wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Matt, >>>> >>>> I set up

Re: osx 10.6 strange rsync errors

2010-04-06 Thread Robert DuToit
On Apr 6, 2010, at 9:14 AM, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote: > On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, Robert DuToit wrote: > >> Hi Matt, >> >> I set up a simple test with a nest of directories ( aa > bb > cc > dd >> &ee) with 1 file in each. running rsync from OS 10.6 to an

Re: osx 10.6 strange rsync errors

2010-04-06 Thread Robert DuToit
Matt, I forgot to mention, If I add an exclude for .DS_Store* it doesn't generate the odd .DS_Store files. However, if I copy directories with other types of hidden files like .bash_history then it generates odd versions of those too. So I added an exclude for every hidden (dot prefix) file

Re: osx 10.6 strange rsync errors

2010-04-05 Thread Robert DuToit
Hi Matt, I set up a simple test with a nest of directories ( aa > bb > cc > dd &ee) with 1 file in each. running rsync from OS 10.6 to another Mac with OS10.5 there seems to be no problem. When doing the reverse I am seeing the odd behavior. Below is the log from running the options -aHAXN --f

Re: osx 10.6 strange rsync errors

2010-04-05 Thread Robert DuToit
On Apr 5, 2010, at 1:28 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote: > On Sat, 2010-04-03 at 18:12 -0400, Robert DuToit wrote: >> I have been getting reports from users of backuplist+, my wrapper >> application for rsync (currently with build of 3.0.6), about odd >> behavior after updating to

Re: osx 10.6 strange rsync errors

2010-04-04 Thread Robert DuToit
Hi Eric et al, It seems this is not an rsync problem though I am not sure The same thing happens with the Apple supplied rsync as with 3.0.7 (someone emailed me about the same problem using the old apple supplied rsync) and I wonder if other file transfer options might have similar results

osx 10.6 strange rsync errors

2010-04-03 Thread Robert DuToit
Hi All, I have been getting reports from users of backuplist+, my wrapper application for rsync (currently with build of 3.0.6), about odd behavior after updating to OS 10.6 Snow Leopard. Basically: the problem occurs backing up a directory to a local mounted network volume. Previously all wor

Re: build on osx 10.6

2009-10-25 Thread Robert DuToit
stead of x86. Cheers, Vitorio Le 25 oct. 09 à 18:19, Robert DuToit a écrit : Hi All, I've been off list for a while and just got around to building rsync 3.0.6 on Mac OSX 10.6 intel core 2 duo machine. It runs great on similar machines but someone just said it won't for their O

build on osx 10.6

2009-10-25 Thread Robert DuToit
Hi All, I've been off list for a while and just got around to building rsync 3.0.6 on Mac OSX 10.6 intel core 2 duo machine. It runs great on similar machines but someone just said it won't for their OSX 10.6 intel core duo and returns an error: rsync Bad CPU type in executable. I che

Re: rsync hang at end

2008-05-23 Thread Robert DuToit
Hi larry, This rsync was compiled on an intel running 10.4.11 so the architecture is right. I am wondering though if it would make a difference to compile it on the 10.5.2 machine it seems to hang on I have assumed all along that compiling it on the previous OS would be upward compati

rsync hang at end

2008-05-23 Thread Robert DuToit
Hi All, My wrapper application for rsync 3.0.2 on osx has been working smoothly except for reports of it hanging on the last file of the transfer to a local firewire drive. We seem to have solved the mystery of the slow transfers but now, every four or five runs, it hangs at the last fi

large backups taking longer with 3.0.2

2008-05-09 Thread Robert DuToit
Hi All, I havn't compiled 3.0.3 pre1 yet but have been seeing considerable longer backup times on OSX 5.2, using 3.0.2 over 3.0.1. Has anyone else noticed this? The progress doesn't seem to show any problems or differences from 3.0.1 either. backing up 100+GB internal drive, with 1 milli

osx custom icons

2008-05-08 Thread Robert DuToit
Hi All, This is a simple question but I have noticed that using rsync 3.0.2 on a local copy on OSX with basic options rsync -aHAXN --fileflags --force-change --stats -v --progress the custom file/folder icons do not always show up in destination. Sometimes they do and sometimes they don't

Re: Rsync 3.0.2 released w/xattr security fix (attn: 2.6.9 onward)

2008-04-08 Thread Robert DuToit
On Apr 8, 2008, at 12:53 PM, Wayne Davison wrote: I have released rsync 3.0.2. This is a security release to fix a potential buffer overflow in the extended attribute support. For more details, see the rsync security advisory page: http://rsync.samba.org/security.html There is a patch there

Re: another iconv question

2008-03-31 Thread Robert DuToit
On Mar 31, 2008, at 10:14 PM, Wayne Davison wrote: On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 09:54:16AM -0400, Robert DuToit wrote: we tried adding option iconv=C and iconv=C,C but no luck oddly this is what was returned when he ran "locale" on his machine-it didn't specify a locale or ch

another iconv question

2008-03-31 Thread Robert DuToit
Hi All, I am trying to help my friend set up his rsync with iconv. Presently it works fine but re-copies every file with an umlaute in the filename. I saw a recent post about this and the fix but... he ran "locale" ( both source and dest are on same machine) and is running on a German-Sw

iconv

2008-03-20 Thread Robert DuToit
Hi All, A quick question. I tried --iconv=. but it didn't seem to work for my friend with umlautes in his file names. In the archives I found mention of a patch iconv.diff. Is that necessary or is it now included in the source - it wasn't in my latest atches directory? Rob -- To unsubs

get_xattr_names not permitted

2008-03-14 Thread Robert DuToit
Hi All, I have a client running: Source: Xsan 1.4.2 Volume with acl enabled. It is mounted on an xserve Intel 10.4.11 Destination: DAS (Direct attached Storage) Attached through Fiber Channel. (It's a xraid) with acl enabled. using basic options -aHAXN --fileflags -v --progress everything

Re: Rsync 3.0.0 universal binary availible?

2008-03-10 Thread Robert DuToit
Hi All, So far the tests show the universal build of rsync 3.0 (using lipo) to be indeed universal. Metadata tests all come up clean on OSX Tiger and Leopard, both PPC and Intel architectures. Some people asked for the compiled binary so I put it here: http://rdutoit.home.comcast.net/~r

Re: --backup-dir-dels=DIR patch

2008-03-08 Thread Robert DuToit
On Mar 8, 2008, at 10:16 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote: On Sat, 2008-03-08 at 21:52 -0500, Robert DuToit wrote: I think I am missing something with the backup-dir-dels.diff patch. How does that differ from the original --backup -backup-dir=DIR option? It lets you specify a different suffix and

--backup-dir-dels=DIR patch

2008-03-08 Thread Robert DuToit
Hi All, I think I am missing something with the backup-dir-dels.diff patch. How does that differ from the original --backup -backup-dir=DIR option? Using the original one works fine (on patched or non-patched rsync), putting deleted source files into the DIR on destination, but when I run

Re: rsync3 universal binary for Mac OS X?

2008-03-07 Thread Robert DuToit
On Mar 7, 2008, at 12:03 AM, Matt McCutchen wrote: On Thu, 2008-03-06 at 23:21 -0500, Robert DuToit wrote: On Mar 6, 2008, at 8:28 PM, David Miller wrote: Did anyone ever get rsync3 to compile as a universal binary and work correctly on both tiger and leopard on ppc and intel? No. I ended

Re: rsync3 universal binary for Mac OS X?

2008-03-06 Thread Robert DuToit
On Mar 6, 2008, at 8:28 PM, David Miller wrote: Did anyone ever get rsync3 to compile as a universal binary and work correctly on both tiger and leopard on ppc and intel? No. I ended up using two rsyncs, one for PPC and one for intel. The two actually are smaller than the the one universal

Incremental backups too large

2008-03-05 Thread Robert DuToit
Hi All, Continued good results with rsync 3.0 but I have been noticing that incremental no-change backups of my Home folder (15Gb, 50,000+- files) have been using up on average about 500+-MB of disk space. Thinking back a ways to rsync3.0pre7, or earlier, each incremental took up very li

Re: congrats!

2008-03-03 Thread Robert DuToit
On Mar 2, 2008, at 10:13 AM, Wayne Davison wrote: On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 07:40:32AM -0500, Robert DuToit wrote: Indeed - it worked fine. I had forgotten that you changed the default behavior and that --force-schg would override that too. Thanks! In the final patch for 3.0.0 the option

congrats!

2008-03-01 Thread Robert DuToit
Thanks Wayne and everybody, This is a huge boost to have a modern rsync for OSX. We're all grateful. Rob D PS I did notice that we lost the bsd flags test in 3.0. It was ok in pre10 thanks again bbouncer Verifying:basic-permissions ... ok Verifying: timestamps ... Su

fileflags.diff patch

2008-02-25 Thread Robert DuToit
Hi All, I just tried (on OS10.5.2) the new fileflags.diff patch patch -p1 robert-dutoits-powerbook-g4-15:rsync-3.0.0pre10 astrid$ patch -p1 patching file compat.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 45 (offset 1 line). Hunk #2 succeeded at 63 (offset 1 line). Hunk #3 FAILED at 137. 1 out of 3 hunks FAILED --

Re: universal binary and crtimes

2008-02-21 Thread Robert DuToit
t 11:34 PM, Robert DuToit wrote: Hi All, I promise I won't bug you anymore about this but I did find that the compiled universal binary on rsync3.0.pre10 does preserve creation dates across platforms with the old osx-create-time.diff patch but not with the crtimes patch. If anyone has a cl

universal binary and crtimes

2008-02-20 Thread Robert DuToit
Hi All, I promise I won't bug you anymore about this but I did find that the compiled universal binary on rsync3.0.pre10 does preserve creation dates across platforms with the old osx-create-time.diff patch but not with the crtimes patch. If anyone has a clue about this I would be happy

Re: OSX universal rsync

2008-02-20 Thread Robert DuToit
On Feb 20, 2008, at 10:24 PM, Brendan Grieve wrote: Robert DuToit wrote: Hi All, Good news on rsync3.0pre10 universal binary On Feb 20, 2008, at 8:55 PM, Brendan Grieve wrote: Robert DuToit wrote: Just an update, I have confirmed that rsync compiled on an intel won't work on PP

universal binary won't compile

2008-02-20 Thread Robert DuToit
Hi Again, Sorry to keep posting about this. There seems to be a lot of confusion trying to get compatibility with various Mac architectures and OS. Sven Peters was able to compile on an intel Mac running leopard using >patch -p1 patch -p1 >./configure CFLAGS="-isysroot /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX

Fwd: OSX universal rsync

2008-02-20 Thread Robert DuToit
ion_3.html Begin forwarded message: From: Robert DuToit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: February 20, 2008 7:29:05 AM EST To: rsync@lists.samba.org Subject: OSX universal rsync Hi All, Well, we compiled pre9 on an intel Mac running Tiger and now it does work on the machine. I need to see if th

OSX universal rsync

2008-02-20 Thread Robert DuToit
Hi All, Well, we compiled pre9 on an intel Mac running Tiger and now it does work on the machine. I need to see if that will now work on a PPC mac though. Hopefully it will but I am wondering if there is a way to compile and make a universal binary rsync for the Mac that will run on both

Re: broken pipe

2008-02-19 Thread Robert DuToit
: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(1500) [generator=3.0.0pre9] _exit_cleanup(code=12, file=io.c, line=1500): about to call exit(12) On Feb 19, 2008, at 2:10 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote: On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 14:03 -0500, Robert DuToit wrote: I have a client and

broken pipe

2008-02-19 Thread Robert DuToit
Hi All, I have a client and we are trying to create a backup for several folders on OSX 10.4.11 with rsync 3.0.0pre9. One folder copies fine but the other three generate this error and I am stumped. using: rsync -aHAX --fileflags --crtimes -v we get; sending incremental file list rsync

left over permissions symbols on OSX

2008-02-17 Thread Robert DuToit
hi All, There may be no solution to this and it is probably an OSX finder problem, but after most copies with rsync pre9, especially larger ones, many of the copied folders have permission denied symbols (little red circles with lines through them) left on them. These disappear after resta

Re: Rsync 3.0.0pre9 released

2008-02-11 Thread Robert DuToit
Ditto on good results for OSX! One thing I noticed though. I tried -b (--backup) and noticed that the suffix "~" gets added to pre-xisting files as expected but if the file is a package or application it gets added to all the resource files inside the package and renders it unusable. Certa

Fwd: creation date and OSX [performance]

2008-02-03 Thread Robert DuToit
On Feb 3, 2008, at 11:05 PM, Wayne Davison wrote: On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 09:38:20PM -0500, Robert DuToit wrote: I tried the crtimes patch and it compiles and works but when I tried to add the flags patch too I came up with this make error. My latest version of the crtimes.diff patch is now based

Re: creation date and OSX [performance]

2008-02-03 Thread Robert DuToit
On Feb 3, 2008, at 3:56 PM, Robert DuToit wrote: Hi Mike, If I replace the missing patch code for flags.diff in compat.c for instance: nt uid_ndx, gid_ndx, crtimes_ndx, acls_ndx, xattrs_ndx, unsort_ndx; adding ... fileflags_ndx so then nt uid_ndx, gid_ndx, fileflags_ndx , crtimes_ndx

Re: creation date and OSX [performance]

2008-02-03 Thread Robert DuToit
b 02, 2008 at 09:38:20PM -0500, Robert DuToit wrote: I tried the crtimes patch and it compiles and works but when I tried to add the flags patch too I came up with this make error. You apparently missed the patch errors before that. You need to resolve all the failed hunks from the second pa

Re: creation date and OSX [performance]

2008-02-03 Thread Robert DuToit
serve_acls; extern int preserve_xattrs; extern int need_messages_from_generator; how do I resolve this? Thanks Rob On Feb 3, 2008, at 2:20 AM, Wayne Davison wrote: On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 09:38:20PM -0500, Robert DuToit wrote: I tried the crtimes patch and it compiles and works but when I tried

Re: creation date and OSX [performance]

2008-02-02 Thread Robert DuToit
Hi Wayne, I tried the crtimes patch and it compiles and works but when I tried to add the flags patch too I came up with this make error. Though flags compiloes by itself or with the osx-create-time.diff patch. Rob robert-dutoits-powerbook-g4-15:rsync-3.0.0pre8 astrid$ make perl ./mkproto.p

RE: accurate progress for UI

2008-01-30 Thread Robert DuToit
On Jan 30, 2008, at 3:46 AM, Paul Slootman wrote: Do note that disabling the incremental recursion will impact the performance, esp. with a large number of files. I did some tests (I am becoming the OSX rsync_3 benchmark guy!) and for 15GB Home folder, there was only a slight difference in

Re: accurate progress for UI

2008-01-29 Thread Robert DuToit
Thanks Matt, That does it. I know at least there is the option now. Rob On Jan 29, 2008, at 2:34 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote: On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 14:25 -0500, Robert DuToit wrote: I made a Mac UI application and am running rsync 3 from "do shell script" (applescript) and am tryin

accurate progress for UI

2008-01-29 Thread Robert DuToit
Hi All, I made a Mac UI application and am running rsync 3 from "do shell script" (applescript) and am trying to parse the output so I can get a progress bar to give a fairly true reading of size , or # of files, copied. I notice that the output reads for example, . 1650 of 8345 files

Re: Making rsync compile under Mac OS X 10.3.9 with extended attributes

2008-01-26 Thread Robert DuToit
Matt, I would be happy to implement and test any of these things on OS 10.3 thru 10.5. the only hitch is I am only applescript savvy with a smattering of OBJ-c. so can help if someone tells me what to do, what code to implement etc. But this is probably where Vitorio comes in- he sounds e

Re: Making rsync compile under Mac OS X 10.3.9 with extended attributes

2008-01-26 Thread Robert DuToit
that didn't on the 10.5 build)! Thanks, Rob On Jan 25, 2008, at 11:13 PM, Matt McCutchen wrote: On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 21:38 -0500, Robert DuToit wrote: I reinstalled developer tools again on OS10.3.2 and ran make again and this time and saw more action but a lot of errors such as th

Re: Making rsync compile under Mac OS X 10.3.9 with extended attributes

2008-01-26 Thread Robert DuToit
ib/sysxattrs.c:77: warning: implicit declaration of function `listxattr' lib/sysxattrs.c:77: error: `XATTR_NOFOLLOW' undeclared (first use in this function) make: *** [lib/sysxattrs.o] Error 1 Robert-DuToits-Computer:~/rsync-3.0.0pre8 robertdutoit$ On Jan 25, 2008, at 11:

Re: Making rsync compile under Mac OS X 10.3.9 with extended attributes

2008-01-25 Thread Robert DuToit
declared (first use in this function) acls.c:925: error: `mode' undeclared (first use in this function) acls.c:939: error: `ACL_TYPE_EXTENDED' undeclared (first use in this function) acls.c: In function `set_acl': acls.c:967: error: `duo_item' undeclared (first use in this functi

Re: Making rsync compile under Mac OS X 10.3.9 with extended attributes

2008-01-25 Thread Robert DuToit
Hi all, Somewhat along the same lines, I wanted to see if rsync 3 would work on Mac OS10.3X so I made a test partition and installed 10.3.2 on it ( no updates around). I then installed xcode 1.5 and with a fresh copy of rsync 3.0.0pre8 and tried ./configure which worked fine. When I tried

Re: preserving Mac OS X metadata in rsync backups and restores

2008-01-21 Thread Robert DuToit
Hi All, I ran the bouncer tests too and came up with same results except the "fifo" and "devices" failed. I ran it from command line as well as from "do shell script" command with same results. I used the same patches. Nevertheless, I am thrilled with the results here for OSX and can't th

Re: preserving Mac OS X metadata in rsync backups and restores

2008-01-19 Thread Robert DuToit
On Jan 18, 2008, at 11:38 PM, Moritz Heckscher wrote: Am 2008-01-19 um 05:31 schrieb Matt McCutchen: On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 05:12 +0100, Moritz Heckscher wrote: Using the following options for rsync: --archive --hard-links --acls --xattrs --executability --numeric-ids I get the following o

Re: Tiger compatibility

2007-12-02 Thread Robert DuToit
Thanks Giuliano- I can't believe I didn't think of that. It works well now. Thanks, Rob D On Dec 2, 2007, at 4:18 PM, Giuliano Gavazzi wrote: On 2 Dec 2007, at 19:58, Robert DuToit wrote: Hi, Before I go any further about OSX creation dates etc. I just discovered that the pr

  1   2   >