[Bug 15163] rsync timeout non-effective

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15163 --- Comment #1 from roland --- here is some strace from the backup host to show the difference if i set timeout=60 , rsyncing "root@172.20.37.189:/" hangs forever: 08:25:30 select(4, [3], [], [3], {tv_sec=30, tv_usec=0}) = 1 (in [3], left

[SCM] The rsync repository. - branch master updated

The branch, master has been updated via ad53a9b5 Also change dashes in the dict var names to make jq use easier. via 17502886 A few more tweaks. via 087fffaa Unify older protect-args capability to secluded-args name. via 5c1fa2a2 Use dict for capabilities &

Patch: more detailed error logging when an ACL unpack error occurs

Hi, I maintain the rsync port in MacPorts. For ten years, we've been carrying around a one-line patch which was described by its contributor this way: > Occasionally, sync will report an ACL unpack error, but the user will be left > in the dark regarding which file(s) was affected. This adds

[SCM] The rsync repository. - branch master updated

The branch, master has been updated via 0efa63f2 Use JSON output if --version (-V) is repeated (client side only). via ae16850d Add support for various SHA checksum digests via 7e2711bb Improve various things in the checksum code via b8c2fde3 Try freebsd-13-1 to

Re: Make an rsync using script with old and new versions of rsync without using the "old" way (--old-args)?

On Fri, Sep 2, 2022 at 1:19 AM c.buhtz wrote: > 4. `--protect-args` activates the "new" behavior > Essentially, just in a way that has a couple drawbacks: it would have refused to work with rsyncs older than 3.0.0, and it would have refused to work with a remote rrsync setup (since the

[rsync-announce] Rsync 3.2.6 released

I have released rsync 3.2.6. A fairly simple bugfix release. To see a summary of all the recent changes, visit this link: https://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/NEWS#3.2.6 You can download the source tar file and its signature from here: https://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/rsync-3.2.6.tar.gz

Rsync 3.2.6 released

I have released rsync 3.2.6. A fairly simple bugfix release. To see a summary of all the recent changes, visit this link: https://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/NEWS#3.2.6 You can download the source tar file and its signature from here: https://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/rsync-3.2.6.tar.gz

[SCM] The rsync repository. - annotated tag v3.2.6 created

The annotated tag, v3.2.6 has been created at 40695f1e31d29e5d715d986a53cdad1fe0ce0210 (tag) tagging db5bfe67a5d022f9ad25340db6bc2cca2cbbdb65 (commit) replaces v3.2.5 tagged by Wayne Davison on Fri Sep 9 12:23:44 2022 -0700 - Log

[SCM] The rsync repository. - branch master updated

The branch, master has been updated via db5bfe67 Preparing for release of 3.2.6 from 5447d038 Mention a potential bash security issue with openssh forced commands. https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync.git;a=shortlog;h=master - Log

[SCM] The rsync repository. - branch master updated

The branch, master has been updated via 5447d038 Mention a potential bash security issue with openssh forced commands. from 71177363 A few more minor tweaks. https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync.git;a=shortlog;h=master - Log

Fwd: rsync on z/OS

Hi, I am trying to enable rsync on the z/OS operating system. One problem is that in rsync.h, the 'mode' field of 'struct file_struct' is uint16, but on z/OS, mode_t is 32 bits, not 16, and so information gets lost. A bigger problem is that the bits behind the definition of S_ISREG on z/OS:

Patch: disable path sanitization for modules rooted at "/"

When running in daemon mode with a module rooted at "/", it is not possible to "escape" the module. Not by prefixing a link target with "../../../../../../..". Not by prefixing a link target with "/" nor "". So it seems to me that path sanitization is not useful in this case. And it

[Bug 15163] New: rsync timeout non-effective

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15163 Bug ID: 15163 Summary: rsync timeout non-effective Product: rsync Version: 3.2.0 Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

BUG?: rsync timeout non-effective

apparently, it must be a bug if i do /root/rsync/rsync-3.2.5/rsync -avi --timeout=10 --exclude='/proc' --exclude='/dev/'  root@172.20.37.189:/ /zfspool/backup/172.20.37.189/ it hangs forever , as soon as rsync tries to traverse the suspended/hanging /iscsipool on the remote machine if i do

Invalid dir index: -826 (-101 - -825) [receiver] -- rsync error: protocol incompatibility (code 2) at rsync.c(370) [receiver=3.2.5]

Hi, folk. I got some problem when running this command on client side: # rsync -avPH --chown=root:wheel --chmod=D755,F644 --delete --exclude ads --exclude backup rsync://192.168.0.100/data /mnt/DATA receiving incremental file list Invalid dir index: -826 (-101 - -825) [receiver] rsync error:

Make an rsync using script with old and new versions of rsync without using the "old" way (--old-args)?

Hello, this is not a usual support question which could be solved by reading documentation. I'm an upstream maintainer highly depending on rsync. I'm doing some research to better understand the behavior change [1] about argument protection when using spaces in path names. I'm not sure if I

[SCM] The rsync repository. - branch master updated

The branch, master has been updated via 71177363 A few more minor tweaks. from bf3e49b4 Improve the daemon info a bit. https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync.git;a=shortlog;h=master - Log - commit

[SCM] The rsync repository. - branch master updated

The branch, master has been updated via bf3e49b4 Improve the daemon info a bit. from 034d5e87 Tweak a couple links. https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync.git;a=shortlog;h=master - Log - commit

Re: rsync timeout non-effective

there is connection timeout and I/O timeout i'm using the I/O timeout. for "--timeout" manpage is "if no data is transferredthen rsync will exit" no data is being transferred for hours, but it doesn't exit. so, what's the problem here ?        --timeout=SECONDS   This

Re: rsync timeout non-effective

You are using rsync over ssh. The connection timeout (and port) options don't matter if rsync isn't doing the networking. On 9/1/22 08:49, Roland via rsync wrote: hello, i do some backup via rsync/ssh and pull data from remote machine to local machine. whenever on remote machine there is

rsync timeout non-effective

hello, i do some backup via rsync/ssh and pull data from remote machine to local machine. whenever on remote machine there is some network attached subdir getting "stuck" (i.e. read/write is blocking, eg. by suspended zfs pool because of error), rsync backup also hangs forever. i wonder what's

[Bug 15122] Potential vulnerability: rsync creates files outside the target directory

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15122 --- Comment #3 from Aditya Basu --- Apologies for the late response. It is definitely a bad idea to mix multi-case systems. However, note that even copying between case-honoring systems can have similar consequences, for ex. case-insensitive

[SCM] The rsync repository. - branch master updated

The branch, master has been updated via 034d5e87 Tweak a couple links. from ad891743 Mention that copying to a case-ignoring filesystem can be problematical. https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync.git;a=shortlog;h=master - Log

[SCM] The rsync repository. - branch master updated

The branch, master has been updated via ad891743 Mention that copying to a case-ignoring filesystem can be problematical. from 1b664d30 Fix an unreleased bug handling a leading dot. https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync.git;a=shortlog;h=master - Log

[Bug 15122] Potential vulnerability: rsync creates files outside the target directory

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15122 --- Comment #2 from Wayne Davison --- BTW, what happens in the test case you provided is that the generator creates TOPDIR and then TOPDIR/secret dirs before asking the sender to start a transfer of TOPDIR/secret/config. It then goes on to notice

[SCM] The rsync repository. - branch master updated

The branch, master has been updated via 1b664d30 Fix an unreleased bug handling a leading dot. from ea38f34d Another spelling fix. https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync.git;a=shortlog;h=master - Log - commit

[SCM] The rsync repository. - branch master updated

The branch, master has been updated via ea38f34d Another spelling fix. via 44d47276 Fix a link. via 1f2f4131 Fix split limits. via 0a09df2c Rename `--protect-args` to `--secluded-args`. via cc861cf8 More NEWS tweaks. from 5183c0d6 Add safety check for

[Bug 15122] Potential vulnerability: rsync creates files outside the target directory

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15122 --- Comment #1 from Wayne Davison --- Yes, it's always bad to copy from a case-honoring filesystem to a case-ignoring filesystem as the filenames can overlap. This is something that the user just shouldn't do, as rsync is written to handle

[Bug 5642] Support use as an engine behind a GUI

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5642 --- Comment #1 from c.bu...@posteo.jp --- As a maintainer of one of that rsync-using-GUIs I would find that also very nice. But I don't see an advantage with XML. To complex and not human readable. Cost a lot of resources (think about

[Bug 15154] New: manpage: Describe default behavior in context of --old-args/--protect-args

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15154 Bug ID: 15154 Summary: manpage: Describe default behavior in context of --old-args/--protect-args Product: rsync Version: 3.2.0 Hardware: All OS: All

[SCM] The rsync repository. - branch master updated

The branch, master has been updated via 5183c0d6 Add safety check for local --remove-source-files. from 706bff91 Mention the latest changes. https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync.git;a=shortlog;h=master - Log - commit

[SCM] The rsync repository. - branch master updated

The branch, master has been updated via 706bff91 Mention the latest changes. from 2c120403 Make sure that the configure.sh script is up-to-date in a release. https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync.git;a=shortlog;h=master - Log

[SCM] The rsync repository. - branch master updated

The branch, master has been updated via 2c120403 Make sure that the configure.sh script is up-to-date in a release. via 8adc2240 Mention `copy-devices`. via 84ad8352 Remove unneeded var. from 9a3449a3 Stop enabling -pedantic-errors.

Re: Problems building rsync with Clang 15 beta

On 8/18/22 19:31, Wayne Davison wrote: Maybe Clang 15 broke the testing idiom that sets $GCC? I think Clang has always pretended to be GCC well enough to fool Autoconf so that 'configure' sets GCC. What's new in Clang 15 is that it starts being pedantic about empty arglists, apparently.

[SCM] The rsync repository. - branch master updated

The branch, master has been updated via 9a3449a3 Stop enabling -pedantic-errors. via 3258534e Change name_num_obj struct to use a name_num_item pointer. via b94bba40 Fix typos on manpage (#358) via a182507b Fix issue when the files-from list isn't nl terminated.

Re: Problems building rsync with Clang 15 beta

On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 9:27 AM Paul Eggert wrote: > But if rsync must add -pedantic-errors for some reason, it should do so at > the very end of 'configure' I think I'll just get rid of it except for some private builds. perhaps it'd be better for rsync to also add -pedantic-errors only for

Re: Problems building rsync with Clang 15 beta

On 8/18/22 09:38, Khem Raj wrote: I think the autoconf patch should be good on its own merits regardless It partly depends on how much we care about compatibility. Putting the 'void' in there will break pre-C89 compilers, as well as C++ compilers pretending (badly) to be C compilers. I doubt

Re: Problems building rsync with Clang 15 beta

On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 8:22 AM Paul Eggert wrote: > > On 8/17/22 23:58, Khem Raj wrote: > > rsync which add -pedantic-errors option to cflags during configure > > OK, that's the problem then. 'configure' should not use flags like > -pedantic-errors. This has long been a property of

Problems building rsync with Clang 15 beta

[Resending because the rsync mailing list rejected my email earlier.] On 8/17/22 23:58, Khem Raj wrote: rsync which add -pedantic-errors option to cflags during configure OK, that's the problem then. 'configure' should not use flags like -pedantic-errors. This has long been a property of

Re: CVE-2022-29154 and v3.2.3

Hi Wayne, Thank you for your detailed answer and links. Gratefully, Mark Esler On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 6:52 PM Wayne Davison wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 9:30 AM Mark Esler wrote: >> >> I am curious if CVE-2022-29154 affects rsync 3.2.3 or rrsync 3.2.3 and >> earlier. > > > The security

Re: CVE-2022-29154 and v3.2.3

On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 9:30 AM Mark Esler wrote: > I am curious if CVE-2022-29154 affects rsync 3.2.3 or rrsync 3.2.3 and > earlier. The security page covers this: it's all versions prior to 3.2.5. if old_style_args is set to true then the

CVE-2022-29154 and v3.2.3

Greetings all, I am curious if CVE-2022-29154 affects rsync 3.2.3 or rrsync 3.2.3 and earlier. More specifically, I am curious if the commit to use protected arguments as default [0] introduced the CVE (if so, v3.2.4pre1 is not affected). The protect args as default commit affects some of the

[PATCH] Add missing prototypes to function declarations

With Clang 15+ compiler -Wstrict-prototypes is triggering warnings which are turned into errors with -Werror, this fixes the problem by adding missing prototypes Fixes errors like | log.c:134:24: error: a function declaration without a prototype is deprecated in all versions of C

[SCM] The rsync repository. - branch master updated

The branch, master has been updated via def595c5 Remove useless comment. via 68b1ce1d Only run git describe if .git exists in the $srcdir. via 5a4116e5 Start 3.2.6dev going. from 024bf1d8 Do more path cleaning in add_implied_include(); make u.slash_cnt more

[SCM] The rsync repository. - branch master updated

The branch, master has been updated via 024bf1d8 Do more path cleaning in add_implied_include(); make u.slash_cnt more accurate. via db4f919e Allow ~/remote/./path with -R if the path has /./ in it. via 6ac2c7b6 We must use the CSUM_CHUNK size in the non-openssl MD4 code.

[SCM] The rsync repository. - annotated tag v3.2.5 created

The annotated tag, v3.2.5 has been created at 001cc050f46d05cb0487359ed5101018da14a5a3 (tag) tagging 0e10163a9d984a8858f7d83b5c7b46889536aa96 (commit) replaces v3.2.5pre2 tagged by Wayne Davison on Sun Aug 14 12:39:48 2022 -0700 - Log

[SCM] The rsync repository. - annotated tag v3.2.5 deleted

The annotated tag, v3.2.5 has been deleted was 72c414a5558485b3619f7690ca85dd86a5605185 --- tag v3.2.5 Version 3.2.5. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iG8EABECAC8WIQQASMiwJtTJbw5YnC9shZ+xS5aoxQUCYvkwSBEcd2F5bmVkQHNh

[rsync-announce] Rsync 3.2.5 released

I have released rsync 3.2.5. A bugfix release that includes a couple security fixes. To see a summary of all the recent changes, visit this link: https://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/NEWS#3.2.5 You can download the source tar file and its signature from here:

Rsync 3.2.5 released

I have released rsync 3.2.5. A bugfix release that includes a couple security fixes. To see a summary of all the recent changes, visit this link: https://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/NEWS#3.2.5 You can download the source tar file and its signature from here:

[SCM] The rsync repository. - annotated tag v3.2.5 created

The annotated tag, v3.2.5 has been created at 72c414a5558485b3619f7690ca85dd86a5605185 (tag) tagging 5fcf20ee9d8abf7aae8578354f82c6f500822e06 (commit) replaces v3.2.5pre2 tagged by Wayne Davison on Sun Aug 14 10:26:32 2022 -0700 - Log

[SCM] The rsync repository. - branch master updated

The branch, master has been updated via 5fcf20ee Preparing for release of 3.2.5 via fc72d2b7 Update the NEWS. via b7ea3fcd Ensure a dynamically linked xxhash lib is >= 0.8 for XX3. from 9cb7529b Remove some trailing whitespace.

[SCM] The rsync repository. - branch master updated

The branch, master has been updated via 9cb7529b Remove some trailing whitespace. from 55ad8757 Make a `--trust-sender` a bit clearer. https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync.git;a=shortlog;h=master - Log - commit

[SCM] The rsync repository. - branch master updated

The branch, master has been updated via 55ad8757 Make a `--trust-sender` a bit clearer. via 3e4b0117 One more doc tweak. from 2f1d1d5c Add packaging note. https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync.git;a=shortlog;h=master - Log

[SCM] The rsync repository. - branch master updated

The branch, master has been updated via 2f1d1d5c Add packaging note. from 4c0a4067 Fix handling of a character class with an escaped closing bracket. https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync.git;a=shortlog;h=master - Log -

[SCM] The rsync repository. - branch master updated

The branch, master has been updated via 4c0a4067 Fix handling of a character class with an escaped closing bracket. via 85501428 Be a little paranoid. via 97f40754 A couple manpage tweaks. from cff8f044 Add `--trust-sender` option.

[SCM] The rsync repository. - branch master updated

The branch, master has been updated via cff8f044 Add `--trust-sender` option. via db8034f1 Escape leading tilde char when "~" or with -R. via c86763dc Fix handling of daemon module names in file-list verification; convert some while loops to for loops. from 5ce575b1

Re: Reading a batch file

Oh interesting, I do not know the rsync protocol algorithm. I'll search another solution with the output of rsync command.Thank you all. El dom, 7 ago 2022 a la(s) 11:55, Wayne Davison (wa...@opencoder.net) escribió: > On Fri, Aug 5, 2022 at 12:56 PM sergio hernandez wrote: > >> I need to be

[rsync-announce] Rsync 3.2.5pre2 released

Rsync version 3.2.5pre2 is now available for release testing. It mainly includes fixes for the new file-list security code and a buffer fix for the included zlib code. To see a summary of all the recent changes, visit this link: https://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/NEWS#3.2.5 You can download

Rsync 3.2.5pre2 released

Rsync version 3.2.5pre2 is now available for release testing. It mainly includes fixes for the new file-list security code and a buffer fix for the included zlib code. To see a summary of all the recent changes, visit this link: https://rsync.samba.org/ftp/rsync/NEWS#3.2.5 You can download

[SCM] The rsync repository. - branch master updated

The branch, master has been updated via 5ce575b1 Preparing for release of 3.2.5pre2 from fabef23b Fix --relative when copying an absolute path. https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync.git;a=shortlog;h=master - Log - commit

[SCM] The rsync repository. - annotated tag v3.2.5pre2 created

The annotated tag, v3.2.5pre2 has been created at 1bb1c21c8ffce4ea922972ce4060eb72c6a4481b (tag) tagging 5ce575b15726c653312b473bd770c3e7d74d3449 (commit) replaces v3.2.5pre1 tagged by Wayne Davison on Mon Aug 8 22:50:51 2022 -0700 - Log

[SCM] The rsync repository. - branch master updated

The branch, master has been updated via fabef23b Fix --relative when copying an absolute path. via 685bf580 Handle files-from args that span 2 buffers. from 9e2921fc A fix for the zlib fix. https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync.git;a=shortlog;h=master - Log

[SCM] The rsync repository. - branch master updated

The branch, master has been updated via 9e2921fc A fix for the zlib fix. via 80d8f7c7 Handle a "[foo]" arg matching the literal wildcards. via 38e1b075 Fix some issues with backslashed wildcards in args. from d659610a Handle a trailing "/." at the end of a source

[SCM] The rsync repository. - branch master updated

The branch, master has been updated via d659610a Handle a trailing "/." at the end of a source arg. via 6cafc1f8 Update the NEWS. from 788f11ea Fix zlib bug with a large gzip header extra field https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync.git;a=shortlog;h=master - Log

Re: Is there a better way to transfer data that doesn't use so much cache?

I've decided to rewrite the script and use cp and mv rather than rsync. In the past, I've had some lost data using just cp and mv which is why I moved to rsync to put the data into a staging directory. Now that I've been creating more data (newer cameras with higher megapixel files and more

Re: Reading a batch file

On Fri, Aug 5, 2022 at 12:56 PM sergio hernandez wrote: > I need to be able to read the batch file for an external application that > I'm developing. But I don't know what is the structure used in the file. > >> It's a capture of the rsync protocol. Pretty much only rsync knows how to read it as

[SCM] The rsync repository. - branch master updated

The branch, master has been updated via 788f11ea Fix zlib bug with a large gzip header extra field from b7fdc9ef Make sure that --read-batch doesn't try to check args. https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync.git;a=shortlog;h=master - Log

[SCM] The rsync repository. - branch master updated

The branch, master has been updated via b7fdc9ef Make sure that --read-batch doesn't try to check args. via 0d8cc260 Some md-convert doc tweaks. from 29558884 Fix typos in NEWS (#339) https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync.git;a=shortlog;h=master - Log

Re: quick question: --rsh="ssh -l root"

No. On Sun, Aug 07, 2022 at 06:49:45AM +0200, Fourhundred Thecat via rsync wrote: > Hello, > > is there any difference/advantage between these two commands? > > rsync --rsh="ssh -l root" my-host.com > rsync r...@my-host.com > > thank you, > > -- > Please use

quick question: --rsh="ssh -l root"

Hello, is there any difference/advantage between these two commands? rsync --rsh="ssh -l root" my-host.com rsync r...@my-host.com thank you, -- Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list. To unsubscribe or change options:

Re: rsync slowness

I've definitely not seen that. If you can produce a working example and tar it up for us to look at, that might be interesting/useful. Just to check, though: you do not have --checksum/-c on, right? On Sat, Aug 06, 2022 at 05:54:12PM +, Gregory Heytings via rsync wrote: > > I finally take

rsync slowness

I finally take the time to report an rsync slowness pattern that I've been seeing for years. Assuming: a directory with many (> 20K) files, for example a maildir, on the sending side, and a partial copy of that directory on the receiving side, with "enough" missing missing (say 5K),

Re: Reading a batch file

Thank you for answer. Yes I have used the option you mentioned, however, I need to be able to read the batch file for an external application that I'm developing. But I don't know what is the structure used in the file. Regards. El vie, 5 ago 2022 a la(s) 13:12, uxio prego (uxio.pr...@gmail.com)

Re: Reading a batch file

this is the rsync list never used that option, but the manual page tells the batch would be read by --read-batch have you tried that? hth br > On 5 Aug 2022, at 18:40, sergio hernandez via rsync > wrote: > > Could anyone route me to the correct email list to resolve my doubt? Thanks. > >

Re: Reading a batch file

Could anyone route me to the correct email list to resolve my doubt? Thanks. El mié, 27 jul 2022 a la(s) 00:49, sergio hernandez ( sergio.hdzre...@gmail.com) escribió: > Hi, there are any form of read or unpack the batch file generated with the > option --only-write-batch. Or if is a data

Re: Is there a better way to transfer data that doesn't use so much cache?

On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 7:10 PM Dan Stromberg wrote: > However, if you transfer a large amount of data and do not intend to > retransmit that data any time soon, then the memory isn't really put to > good use, and can actually cause your system to slow down significantly - > particularly if

Re: Restriction enforcement

Dear Wayne, all, I recently saw the report from OpenWall on CVE-2022-29154 as well as the prerelease of rsync 3.2.5. I believe that is the same issue (albeit with a malicious scenario attached to it), right? If so, I am happy to see it resolved. Cordially, Koen van Hove From: Wayne Davison

Re: Is there a better way to transfer data that doesn't use so much cache?

On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 5:41 PM Robin Lee Powell via rsync < rsync@lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 02:04:22PM -0400, Rob Campbell via rsync wrote: > > The problem isn't that there are many syncs because the problem happens > on > > the first one that runs. > > You didn't actually

Re: Is there a better way to transfer data that doesn't use so much cache?

On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 02:04:22PM -0400, Rob Campbell via rsync wrote: > I've created a script that syncs (and removes) data from as many as 4 > places and puts them all in one of 2 directories. The commands are: > > rsync -avt --progress --remove-source-files --info=progress2 -f'+ *.nef' >

Is there a better way to transfer data that doesn't use so much cache?

I've created a script that syncs (and removes) data from as many as 4 places and puts them all in one of 2 directories. The commands are: rsync -avt --progress --remove-source-files --info=progress2 -f'+ *.nef' -f'+ *.jp*g' -f'+ *.tif' -f'+ *.xmp' -f'+ /*' -f'- *' "$D850/DCIM/100ND850/"

[SCM] The rsync repository. - branch master updated

The branch, master has been updated via 29558884 Fix typos in NEWS (#339) from 0773cecc Preparing for release of 3.2.5pre1 https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync.git;a=shortlog;h=master - Log - commit

Re: Rsync 3.2.5pre1 released

On 02/08/2022 08:11, Wayne Davison wrote: I have released rsync version 3.2.5pre1 for release testing. This includes a checksum fix that affects some architectures (such as ARM), improves the security of the received file list, enhances the manpage, etc. I'd really appreciate it if people

https://rsync.samba.org/resources.html

Regards "Please let us know if you have any rsync-related documents to add to this list" From the bung introduction (https://github.com/CharlesMAtkinson/bung): "The rsync-based files backup creates a "rolling full" backup which is easy to browse and restore from using everyday tools.

[rsync-announce] Rsync 3.2.5pre1 released

I have released rsync version 3.2.5pre1 for release testing. This includes a checksum fix that affects some architectures (such as ARM), improves the security of the received file list, enhances the manpage, etc. I'd really appreciate it if people would give this release some extensive testing

Rsync 3.2.5pre1 released

I have released rsync version 3.2.5pre1 for release testing. This includes a checksum fix that affects some architectures (such as ARM), improves the security of the received file list, enhances the manpage, etc. I'd really appreciate it if people would give this release some extensive testing

[SCM] The rsync repository. - annotated tag v3.2.5pre1 created

The annotated tag, v3.2.5pre1 has been created at 1e76ea5ff30dfb1611215260a23694ec4dbd65c2 (tag) tagging 0773cecc1fc6462b321f96dc8cae6e11983c357d (commit) replaces v3.2.4 tagged by Wayne Davison on Mon Aug 1 19:00:36 2022 -0700 - Log

[SCM] The rsync repository. - branch master updated

The branch, master has been updated via 0773cecc Preparing for release of 3.2.5pre1 via 8e335863 Tweaks to allow for a release. via da5c72da More NEWS. via 2f7c5831 A few more minor tweaks. from 51fd4993 Avoid the getgroups program when cross-compiliing.

[SCM] The rsync repository. - branch master updated

The branch, master has been updated via 51fd4993 Avoid the getgroups program when cross-compiliing. via e37bfdb4 Make sure sign is consistend in 2 gid comparisons. from 3d7015af A few more minor changes. https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync.git;a=shortlog;h=master - Log

[SCM] The rsync repository. - branch master updated

The branch, master has been updated via 3d7015af A few more minor changes. from 7e5424b8 More improvements to file-list checking https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync.git;a=shortlog;h=master - Log - commit

[SCM] The rsync repository. - branch master updated

The branch, master has been updated via 7e5424b8 More improvements to file-list checking from 43f70b96 The latest NEWS. https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync.git;a=shortlog;h=master - Log - commit

[SCM] The rsync repository. - branch master updated

The branch, master has been updated via 43f70b96 The latest NEWS. via b7231c7d Some extra file-list safety checks. via 15c34f0a A few more minor doc tweaks. from d1e42ffa A few minor fixes. https://git.samba.org/?p=rsync.git;a=shortlog;h=master - Log

Re: Rsync just hanging sometimes

чт, 28 июл. 2022 г. в 00:01, Alexander Gribanov : > ср, 27 июл. 2022 г. в 16:55, : >> >>> On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 13:30:32 +0300 Alexander Gribanov via rsync wrote: >>> > Rsync starts, goes as in the log below and just hangs like this for >>> minutes >>> > or maybe even hours and nothing changes...

Re: Rsync just hanging sometimes

> > ср, 27 июл. 2022 г. в 16:55, : > >> On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 13:30:32 +0300 Alexander Gribanov via rsync wrote: >> > Rsync starts, goes as in the log below and just hangs like this for >> minutes >> > or maybe even hours and nothing changes... >> >> This may happen when windows is involved. >> >>

Re: Rsync just hanging sometimes

Hello! ср, 27 июл. 2022 г. в 16:55, : > On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 13:30:32 +0300 Alexander Gribanov via rsync wrote: > > Rsync starts, goes as in the log below and just hangs like this for > minutes > > or maybe even hours and nothing changes... > > This may happen when windows is involved. > > Try to

Re: Rsync just hanging sometimes

Hi. On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 13:30:32 +0300 Alexander Gribanov via rsync wrote: > Rsync starts, goes as in the log below and just hangs like this for minutes > or maybe even hours and nothing changes... This may happen when windows is involved. Try to add the --whole-file option. --

Rsync just hanging sometimes

Hello! I just encountered a weird situation and don't even know how to find out what happened? There is nothing in the rsync-server logs, nothing on the screen, maybe should I add some more keys (options) to get more detailed information? I just successfully synchronized one module and got this

Relative path problem

Hello! I have external HDD for backups, but under Windows it may get different drive letter on different computers, so I would like to use relative path instead of full path like ../Backup instead of /cygdrive/g/Backup In this case I have in the root folder of the drive 2 folders: cygwin-rsync -

Reading a batch file

Hi, there are any form of read or unpack the batch file generated with the option --only-write-batch. Or if is a data structure can you tell me where I can found it? Thank you in advance. -- Lic. Sergio Hernández Reyes *Desarrollador de Software8111939182 - sergio.hdzre...@gmail.com * --

Re: do I always have to use either --checksum or --times ?

... That's ... Behaviour confirmed. That is *not* cool. On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 04:18:18AM -0400, Kevin Korb wrote: > Yeah, unfortunately rsync's --checksum doesn't even employ obvious > optimizations that the man page says it does. There is no reason for it to > checksum files that only

Re: do I always have to use either --checksum or --times ?

Yeah, unfortunately rsync's --checksum doesn't even employ obvious optimizations that the man page says it does. There is no reason for it to checksum files that only exist on one end or are different in sizes yet it does. Just try doing an rsync of a huge tree to an empty dir. You won't run

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >