ECTED]
Dave Dykstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Problems with rsync 2.5.1pre1 and hardlinks
Classification:
On 12 Dec 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> An additional hard link to an existing file takes only directory
> space, which, if it&
On 12 Dec 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> An additional hard link to an existing file takes only directory
> space, which, if it's not enough of an addition to that directories
> existing data to cause the filesystem driver to add another
> allocation to the directories data space, takes up no m
call me Tim?"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
12/11/2001 11:42 PM
To: Dave Dykstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Tim Conway/LMT/SC/PHILIPS)
Subject:Re: Problems with rsync 2.5.1pre1 and hardlinks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb am Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 08:53:56AM +0100:
[...]
*
* 'Twas long ago when I did swap-on-a-file as shown above by you. Anyway, I
* succeeded both in upgrading RAM as well as adding an additional swapfile
* and it was confirmed indeed that memory was the problem: the kernel
Martin Pool schrieb am Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 05:40:19PM +1100:
* On 10 Dec 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* > * Running out of memory may be the problem. As a temporary workaround
* > * perhaps you can create an additional swap file (rather than partition)
* > * on the backup server?
*
* OK. To
Dave Dykstra schrieb am Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 02:21:46PM -0600:
[...]
* >
* > *
* > * Ideas:
* > * 1. Would it be possible to use symlinks instead of hardlinks? That
* > * would give you more flexibility to split things up however you
* > * like.
* > * 2. Perhaps you could break it u
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 09:18:33PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dave Dykstra schrieb am Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 01:44:26PM -0600:
> * > I have to copy a structure of 70 directories where the data of these
> * > directories are hardlinked to the data of the 1st directory. Within this
> * > "ori
Dave Dykstra schrieb am Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 01:44:26PM -0600:
* > I have to copy a structure of 70 directories where the data of these
* > directories are hardlinked to the data of the 1st directory. Within this
* > "orig data" directory, I have about 30.000 files, so the amount of files
* > to
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 03:51:29PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I got stuck within some weird prob concerning my 2-node linux cluster and
> the synchronisation tool at hand (rsync-2.5.1pre1).
>
> I have to copy a structure of 70 directories where the data of these
> directories
On 10 Dec 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> * Running out of memory may be the problem. As a temporary workaround
> * perhaps you can create an additional swap file (rather than partition)
> * on the backup server?
OK. To help you out until then, you can do something like this
# dd if=/dev/ze
Martin Pool schrieb am Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 08:20:47AM +1100:
* Do you see any error messages in the log file on the server?
Nope, none - the server thinks it has done all transfers (despite having
its childs still clinging to some 200MB mem...) successfully.
*
* Running out of memory may be th
Do you see any error messages in the log file on the server?
Running out of memory may be the problem. As a temporary workaround
perhaps you can create an additional swap file (rather than partition)
on the backup server?
The rsync hlink code seems to use a bit more memory than is really
necess
Hi,
I got stuck within some weird prob concerning my 2-node linux cluster and
the synchronisation tool at hand (rsync-2.5.1pre1).
I have to copy a structure of 70 directories where the data of these
directories are hardlinked to the data of the 1st directory. Within this
"orig data" directory
13 matches
Mail list logo
