On 9/30/07, Stephen Zemlicka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, let's say this is the first sync and every file is being transferred.
The checksum for each of the files is cached on the local drive. Then, the
next time you sync, it checks the checksum from the cache against the file
to be copied.
On 10/1/07, Matt McCutchen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the remote filesystem supports efficient copying of a range of data
from one offset to another, then #2 is moot and a smart client can do
both pushes and pulls efficiently using your scheme and zsync's
reverse delta-transfer algorithm,
via mapped drive.
regards
roland
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Stephen Zemlicka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: 30.09.07 07:30:04
An: 'Matt McCutchen' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: rsync@lists.samba.org
Betreff: RE: Mapped Drive
The problem is some files don't change in size. So I
On 9/30/07, Stephen Zemlicka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is some files don't change in size. So I was hoping that the
checksums could be cached. Perhaps I'm mistaken but I thought the checksum
determined what actual blocks were transferred. I suppose it could be
cached at either
@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Mapped Drive
On 9/30/07, Stephen Zemlicka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is some files don't change in size. So I was hoping that the
checksums could be cached. Perhaps I'm mistaken but I thought the
checksum
determined what actual blocks were transferred. I
On 9/28/07, Stephen Zemlicka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would this still help for online
storage though as most have much greater download bandwidth than upload. So
it would basically download the file with your faster download speeds,
compare, then upload the changes with your slower upload
On 9/28/07, Stephen Zemlicka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to have rsync cache the checksums for something like this and
would that help?
I'm not sure exactly what you mean. You said you were using the -c
(--checksum) option, which makes rsync decide whether to update each
Zemlicka
Integrated Computer Technologies
PH. 608-558-5926
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
McCutchen
Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2007 5:03 PM
To: Stephen Zemlicka
Cc: rsync@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Mapped
] On Behalf Of Matt
McCutchen
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 6:51 PM
To: Stephen Zemlicka
Cc: rsync@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Mapped Drive
On 9/24/07, Stephen Zemlicka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I got it (with the help of a friend). You can, in fact, rsync to
a
mapped drive efficiently
@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Mapped Drive
On 9/24/07, Stephen Zemlicka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I got it (with the help of a friend). You can, in fact, rsync to
a
mapped drive efficiently. You must include --no-whole-file. My 100MB
file
only transferred a few MB using that method and it opened
On 9/24/07, Stephen Zemlicka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am having trouble running rsync over a mapped drive. Basically it only
copies whole files. I use the –rvcS switches. Any suggestions?
The delta-transfer algorithm reduces only the communication between
the sending and receiving rsync
On Mon 24 Sep 2007, Stephen Zemlicka wrote:
I am having trouble running rsync over a mapped drive. Basically it only
copies whole files. I use the -rvcS switches. Any suggestions?
From the manpage:
-W, --whole-file
With this option the incremental rsync algorithm is not
On 9/24/07, Stephen Zemlicka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What exactly is involved in the remote shell? Can this be done on a windows
to windows backup? Do you have a link handy otherwise google to the rescue.
Thank you very much.
You set up an ssh server on the machine with the mapped drive,
12:24 PM
To: Stephen Zemlicka
Cc: rsync@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Mapped Drive
On 9/24/07, Stephen Zemlicka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What exactly is involved in the remote shell? Can this be done on a
windows
to windows backup? Do you have a link handy otherwise google to the
rescue.
Thank
On 9/24/07, Stephen Zemlicka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The reason I was trying this was because all I can do is map a drive. As of
yet, I cannot modify the server like that.
If the only access you have to the remote directory is to read or
write it via a mapped drive, you can't hope to do any
: Mapped Drive
On 9/24/07, Stephen Zemlicka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The reason I was trying this was because all I can do is map a drive. As
of
yet, I cannot modify the server like that.
If the only access you have to the remote directory is to read or
write it via a mapped drive, you can't hope
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
McCutchen
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 12:46 PM
To: Stephen Zemlicka
Cc: rsync@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Mapped Drive
On 9/24/07, Stephen Zemlicka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The reason I was trying this was because all I can do is map a drive. As
of
yet, I cannot modify
17 matches
Mail list logo