On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 10:57:56AM -0500, John Madden wrote:
send_files failed to open //home/user/Maildir/new/_dwG.NeZv8.blah: No such
file or directory
rsync error: partial transfer (code 23) at main.c(578)
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 11:50:41AM -0701, Jos Backus wrote:
I'd be quite happy
I see a lot of good advice has been posted about stuff that is quite good to
know about perl.
A simpler solution though might be the File::Rsync module available on CPAN.
I use it a lot and it works very well. It will generate the rsync command
line for you, and it can be given a callback which
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 12:08:56PM -0400, Corey Stup wrote:
The option --delete-after does not seem to work.
In a command such as
rysnc -avzSH --progress --stats --delete-after remote::XYZ/dirX /export/home
files removed from the source are not removed at the destination.
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 01:04:09PM +1000, Martin Pool wrote:
I haven't had a chance to test this recently, but Dave just reminded
me that it ought to merge soon and I agree.
I was thinking about this the other day in the context of the
Bitkeeper bk url manpage (if Colin will forgive me :-).
I'm sorry for the long delay in replying. I'm cleaning up my rsync mailbox
now after a one week vacation and about a month of not having time to look
at it.
I think the --flags patch is probably fine, except that that the short
description should at least say preserve file flags instead of just
I'm cleaning out my rsync mailbox and it looks like nobody responded
to your questions.
On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 02:56:18AM -0600, Poe Chen wrote:
Hi, all,
I'd like to know if there is a way to set the ownership/group/permission
when you are transfering files from a Windows clients to a
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 06:18:40PM -0800, Yuri Kretov wrote:
Hello,
May be I am wrong, but why rsync tells me that it's nothing to do?
I just want to synchronize the directory's attributes (with no recursion) such as:
permissions, owner, group and time.
Example:
===
host1# pwd
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 06:14:38PM +0200, Michael Zimmermann wrote:
Dear list members,
there are two new rsync-features I made up and would like to discuss with you.
If you think these new features might be useful for the whole rsync-community,
please give me a note and I'll send you the
Does anybody know if this might cause problems on non-Windows machines?
Would shutdown need to be checked in configure, or is it implemented on
all Unix variants? I don't recall ever seeing a need for it on Unix.
- Dave
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 11:39:57AM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
The problem
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Dave Dykstra wrote:
I think --delete-after should imply --delete. Would someone like to
work up the simple patch to the code and the man page?
Sure. Here's one (note that the OPT_DELETE_AFTER enum was already
defined for some reason).
..wayne..
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 09:46:09PM -0400, Shirish H. Phatak wrote:
Hi Martin,
I can definitely help in managing the librsync package, especially
since I will be maintaining our local tree anyway. As of now, I don't
have the resources to get the Windows stuff tested; however, I can
Eric, which version of Sun operating system were you running, and was there
any NFS involved? What's a NAS disk? I had a user who reported having
rsync (a CVS version between 2.5.4 and 2.5.5) produce a file filled with
nulls but he was copying from a Solaris client which was mounting over NFS
Dave Dykstra wrote:
Eric, which version of Sun operating system were you running, and was there
any NFS involved? What's a NAS disk?
Yes NFS on both ends. Solaris 8 on destination. Netapps NAS boxes on
both ends.
NAS -- Network Attached Storage. Netapps F720 NFS 'toaster' boxes. (lots
of
123
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
On 25 Apr 2002, Dave Dykstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you mean rsync's call to chroot, or a chroot around the whole
invocation of rsync? Rsync's chroot doesn't happen until after the uid =
in rsyncd.conf is processed, so that still works without copying in the
passwd file.
Oh, quite
Sorry for the junk mail, it seems my last post was lost in the ether,
despite being successfully delivered to lists.samba.org (!)
Very frustrating, since I didn't keep a copy of it.
My question was regarding what might be called symmetric mirroring,
where two sets of identical files, both being
On 25 Apr 2002, Dave Dykstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is caused because rsync does not close its sockets, and WinSock is a
quite strict on this. The solution is to shutdown and close the fd.
This is a 5-minute hack I've done to fix the obvious occurrences of the problem.
It
On 25 Apr 2002, Rich Winkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry for the junk mail, it seems my last post was lost in the ether,
despite being successfully delivered to lists.samba.org (!)
Very frustrating, since I didn't keep a copy of it.
My question was regarding what might be called symmetric
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 12:18:59PM -0500, Dave Dykstra wrote:
The code is currently doing a continue after that error, not an exit, so
it should be continuing on to do the rest of the files before it exits.
However, an error message is printed at exit time.
It sounds like the files rsync
On 25 Apr 2002, Dave Dykstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shouldn't/couldn't the ignore silently if excluded be specified less
strictly to cover the above permission denied error as well?
I think you're right. Martin Pool, what do you think? Martin Bene, could
you please try coding and
Hi Dave,
on Thu, 25 Apr 2002 15:52:56 -0500 Dave Dykstra wrote
concerning Re: 4.4BSD chflags support for rsync something like this:
I think the --flags patch is probably fine, except that that the short
description should at least say preserve file flags instead of just
preserve flags since
Hi Martin,
I guess I need to be more specific. I have a unix user who has unix
machines at home and at work. He wants local access to the same set of
files whether he's at home or at work.
If each side updates a non-overlapping set of files you can do this
using --update to push only the
Is there a way to specify to rsync that metadata should NOT be updated
unless the object was created, or the contents of a file was modified.
Specifically, what I want to do is use rsync to install a file tree
of a few changes (a package being replicated to multiple machines after
it has been
23 matches
Mail list logo
