We're using rsync 2.5.6 version 26.
Want to synch two W2K directories which are not on my machine (machine1 synchs
machine2 - machine3)
I would like to synch the 2 direcories with the following syntax:
rsync.exe -rva //remote_server1/share$/dir1/default.asp remote_server2::dir2/
When I try
Dennis Chelukanov writes:
I running rsync in daemon mode (rsync --daemon)
Everything seems to work well until I try to protect item with
password.
here is my /etc/rsyncd.conf :
use chroot = yes
max connections = 10
syslog facility = local5
[ftp]
path = /var/ftp
Greetings!
I've heard about using rsync to replicate data across the WAN, but need to know
if anyone is using it on a large scale.
I have a client who is contemplating consolidating Windows file/print servers
into a Linux partition on an iSeries. The show stopper is whether rsync (or
any
Wir sind es noch einmal! ;-)
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,
aller Anfang ist schwer
Vor einigen Tagen haben wir Sie auf den neuen AUSSCHREIBUNGS-MONITOR hingewiesen. Über
die riesige Resonanz und Ihre zahlreichen Anregungen haben wir uns sehr gefreut.
Leider ist uns ein bedauerlicher
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 06:56:20AM -0700, Laura Ausel wrote:
I've heard about using rsync to replicate data across the WAN, but need to know
if anyone is using it on a large scale.
Many are using it on large scales. There are scaling issues
and mitigation depends on the definition of large.
jw schultz wrote
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 06:56:20AM -0700, Laura Ausel wrote:
I've heard about using rsync to replicate data across the WAN, but need to know
if anyone is using it on a large scale.
Many are using it on large scales. There are scaling issues
and mitigation depends on the
I wanted to flag a problem and offer a possible solution.
The problem:
large rsync operation fails on machines with modest amounts of memory.
Proposal:
Add a parameter to rsync recursive to specify a recursion level (See
example bash wrapper below). (works with recursive file system rsyncs
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 06:25:51PM -0700, Matt Olson wrote:
I wanted to flag a problem and offer a possible solution.
The problem:
large rsync operation fails on machines with modest amounts of memory.
Proposal:
Add a parameter to rsync recursive to specify a recursion level (See
jw schultz wrote:
Sounds promising.
The pitfall you with rsync in threads is that rsync forks
with a COW expectation using a great deal of data set prior
to the fork. Some of that data is altered. In particular a
slew of global variables that must become thread unique when
modified or things
On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 11:28:11PM -0400, John E. Malmberg wrote:
jw schultz wrote:
Sounds promising.
The pitfall you with rsync in threads is that rsync forks
with a COW expectation using a great deal of data set prior
to the fork. Some of that data is altered. In particular a
slew of
10 matches
Mail list logo
