Re: Rysnc Schedule

2007-07-18 Thread Matt McCutchen

On 7/18/07, Charles Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Is there an alternate way to remove an entire directory *without*
traversing the directory itself?


No filesystem that I know of provides one, although it would be great
to be able to issue a single unlink or rmdir call and have the
filesystem traverse the directory and free its insides in the
background.

Matt
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


Re: Rysnc Schedule

2007-07-18 Thread Charles Marcus

On 7/18/2007, Chuck Wolber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:

In linux, you delete files with the "rm" command...


OT follow-up...

Is there an alternate way to remove an entire directory *without* 
traversing the directory itself?


--

Best regards,

Charles
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


Re: Rysnc Schedule

2007-07-18 Thread Chuck Wolber
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, sparty2809 wrote:

> I understand how to do the rsync part, but how would I delete the files?

In linux, you delete files with the "rm" command... In windows you'd 
probably want to use "deltree"... Or, you could get really fancy and use 
directed charges of thermite, although that might make it difficult to 
re-use portions of the disk...

..Chuck..


-- 
http://www.quantumlinux.com
 Quantum Linux Laboratories, LLC.
 ACCELERATING Business with Open Technology

 "The measure of the restoration lies in the extent to which we apply
  social values more noble than mere monetary profit." - FDR

09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
-- 
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


Re: Rysnc Schedule

2007-07-18 Thread sparty2809

I understand how to do the rsync part, but how would I delete the files?



Chuck Wolber wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, sparty2809 wrote:
> 
>> 
>> What I want to do is use rsync to back up a folder to an external drive.
>> 
>> I would like to keep 30 days worth.
>> 
>> For example: I have backups of June 1 - June 30. Once July 1 comes 
>> along, I want to keep June 2 - July 1 and delete June 1, and so forth.
>> 
>> Any ideas how I can accomplish this?
> 
> Do the backups with rsync and write a shell script that runs every night 
> that deletes the 31st (and greater) backup.
> 
> ..Chuck..
> 
> 
> -- 
> http://www.quantumlinux.com
>  Quantum Linux Laboratories, LLC.
>  ACCELERATING Business with Open Technology
> 
>  "The measure of the restoration lies in the extent to which we apply
>   social values more noble than mere monetary profit." - FDR
> 
> 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
> -- 
> To unsubscribe or change options:
> https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
> Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Rysnc-Schedule-tf4104577.html#a11678999
Sent from the Samba - rsync mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4402] Incorrect time logged with glibc 2.5 inside chroot area

2007-07-18 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4402





--- Comment #7 from [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-07-18 17:24 CST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Strangely enough, none of the several variations of the program
> that I tried exhibit the problem, while an rsync daemon I set up does.

Did you try using localtime() instead of localtime_r()?  I wonder if the latter
would help rsync?

Did you try forking after the chroot?


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
-- 
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


Re: Rysnc Schedule

2007-07-18 Thread Chuck Wolber
On Wed, 18 Jul 2007, sparty2809 wrote:

> 
> What I want to do is use rsync to back up a folder to an external drive.
> 
> I would like to keep 30 days worth.
> 
> For example: I have backups of June 1 - June 30. Once July 1 comes 
> along, I want to keep June 2 - July 1 and delete June 1, and so forth.
> 
> Any ideas how I can accomplish this?

Do the backups with rsync and write a shell script that runs every night 
that deletes the 31st (and greater) backup.

..Chuck..


-- 
http://www.quantumlinux.com
 Quantum Linux Laboratories, LLC.
 ACCELERATING Business with Open Technology

 "The measure of the restoration lies in the extent to which we apply
  social values more noble than mere monetary profit." - FDR

09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
-- 
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4402] Incorrect time logged with glibc 2.5 inside chroot area

2007-07-18 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4402





--- Comment #6 from [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-07-18 13:44 CST ---
I should add that I tested on Fedora 7 with glibc-2.6-4 .


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
-- 
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4402] Incorrect time logged with glibc 2.5 inside chroot area

2007-07-18 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4402





--- Comment #5 from [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-07-18 13:41 CST ---
Created an attachment (id=2829)
 --> (https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=2829&action=view)
Chroot + timezone test program

I wrote a small test program in C to try to reproduce the problem without rsync
(attached).  Strangely enough, none of the several variations of the program
that I tried exhibit the problem, while an rsync daemon I set up does.  I
wonder what rsync is doing differently.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
-- 
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4402] Incorrect time logged with glibc 2.5 inside chroot area

2007-07-18 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4402


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2007-07-18 12:40 CST ---
Is there anything to be done about this?
Problem still exists today with 2.6.9 and both glibc-2.5 and glibc-2.6.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
-- 
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


Re: Rysnc Schedule

2007-07-18 Thread Matt McCutchen

On 7/18/07, sparty2809 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

What I want to do is use rsync to back up a folder to an external drive.

I would like to keep 30 days worth.

For example: I have backups of June 1 - June 30. Once July 1 comes along, I
want to keep June 2 - July 1 and delete June 1, and so forth.

Any ideas how I can accomplish this?


You can do this very easily with rsnapshot ( http://www.rsnapshot.org/
), a backup program built around rsync.  It manages a rotating set of
snapshots that all appear to be full, but unchanged files are
hard-linked from one snapshot to the next to save storage.  You would
configure it with a single backup point and a single interval,
"daily", with 30 snapshots.

If space on the external disk is an issue, you could use rdiff-backup
( http://www.nongnu.org/rdiff-backup/ ) instead.  It represents old
versions of a file using a chain of backward deltas instead of full
copies.

Matt
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


Rysnc Schedule

2007-07-18 Thread sparty2809

What I want to do is use rsync to back up a folder to an external drive.

I would like to keep 30 days worth.

For example: I have backups of June 1 - June 30. Once July 1 comes along, I
want to keep June 2 - July 1 and delete June 1, and so forth.

Any ideas how I can accomplish this?
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Rysnc-Schedule-tf4104577.html#a11672997
Sent from the Samba - rsync mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


Re: Internal error: wrong write used in receiver.

2007-07-18 Thread Matt McCutchen

On 7/18/07, kimry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

###
patch -p1 < rsync-acl-patch

(Stripping trailing CRs from patch.)
patching file flist.c
patch unexpectedly ends in middle of line ===>> is that ok?


I think you are just missing the newline at the very end of
rsync-acl-patch, following the second closing brace.  Add it and the
warning should go away.

Matt
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


Internal error: wrong write used in receiver.

2007-07-18 Thread kimry

##
patch -p1 < rsync-acl-patch {
http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2006-November/016706.html}

(Stripping trailing CRs from patch.)
patching file flist.c
patch unexpectedly ends in middle of line ===>> is that ok?
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1003 with fuzz 1.
##


--
_

Basem Elkimry
-- 
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Re: Internal error: wrong write used in receiver.

2007-07-18 Thread Matt McCutchen

On 7/18/07, kimry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I just started to use rsync-acl-2.6.9.tar.bz2

And I got the same error

Internal error: wrong write used in receiver.



Is there a fix for that?


The patch is here:
http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2006-November/016706.html

Matt
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


Internal error: wrong write used in receiver.

2007-07-18 Thread kimry

Hi,



I just started to use rsync-acl-2.6.9.tar.bz2

And I got the same error



Internal error: wrong write used in receiver.

rsync error: protocol incompatibility (code 2) at io.c(1204) [generator=
2.6.9]

rsync error: received SIGUSR1 (code 19) at main.c(1182) [receiver=2.6.9]


it runs just fine without "--delete --force"

I thought just --force is the cause of the error but I guess it is --delete



Is there a fix for that?



Regards,
-- 
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

Re: rsync replacement

2007-07-18 Thread Jamie Lokier
Jason Haar wrote:
> Jamie Lokier wrote:
> > Check out the "TCP: advanced congestion control" option in a 2.6 Linux
> > kernel, and there is plenty of research on the topic.  See SCTP and
> > DSCP (among others) for the more transaction oriented side.
> >   
> Hi there Jamie
> 
> Like yourself, our WAN (VPN over Internet) suffers majorly from "large
> pipe, but large latency" issues.

The jargon is "large bandwidth-delay product".

> e.g. we have a 10Mbs Internet link, but
> can only get ~2Mbs for a single TCP stream (e.g. HTTP, Rsync).

If you aren't suffering from congestion (in the form of significant
latency jitter, or dropped packets), then the limit is due to the TCP
window size, which you can increase.

It is easy to tell if window size is the problem by looking at the
packet stream using Ethereal: every transmit will keep the window full.

Individual applications can increase it using the SO_SNDBUF and
SO_RCVBUF options.  (Use the appropriate option at the sending and
receiving sides :-)

The default (for applications which don't use those options) is
increased in an OS-specific way.  On Linux, you'd write different
values to /proc/sys/net/ipv4/{tcp_wmem,tcp_rmem,tcp_window_scaling}
and possibly other window-related settings.  Googling for "TCP window
size" and configuring Apache, Samba etc. will probably yield plenty of
suggestions.

If the slowdown is due to congestion or latency jitter, there's a lot
of tuning knobs on Linux and BSD, and the best choice depends on the
types of link you are running over.

You may also be limited by your router _intentionally_ limiting a
single TCP stream.  Or, if your 10Mbs link is implemented by an
aggregation of slower links, the aggregating routers may be mapping
individual TCP streams on to only one of those links (I've seen this,
I think), limiting the speed to one link.

If you have those router limits, all you can do is used multiple
streams.  If you switched to another protocol over UDP, the routers
would probably have the same limitation.  Assuming so, you can work
around it by bonding multiple UDP-based VPNs and run a single TCP stream
over that.  Don't try that until you're sure it's the problem :-)

> Are protocols like SCTP and DSCP really capable of helping in such
> situations? i.e would they improve the throughput of single streamed
> transactions?

No, SCTP and DSCP are not designed for that; they are more aimed at
having multiple concurrent transactions or streams multiplexed into a
single stream of larger packets, without individual delays affecting
every transaction, and sharing congestion control.  (However, you
could implement any of the things which run over UDP, using DSCP
instead and get OS-level congestion management, I think).

-- Jamie
-- 
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html