Re: anchoring of patterns for per-directory merge files

2009-11-12 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 17:14 +, Andy Smith wrote: I'm extremely confused about anchoring of patterns for per-directory merge files, as what I see seems to not be the behaviour the documentation suggests. On the receiver side I have rsync version 3.0.3 protocol version 30. On the

RE: Does files-from work with --delete?

2009-11-12 Thread Philip Pokorny
On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 11:55 -0800, Philip Pokorny wrote: If modifying the file sending code to detect the link_stat not found error and if --delete is enabled, sending that as a delete request (is there such a thing in the protocol?) is the right thing, then I'll work on a code patch. That

Re: exit status 13 in version 3.1

2009-11-12 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Sun, 2009-11-08 at 01:57 -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote: I tested commit 2907af472d1f33b3c422cb9f601c121b242aa9c7 and, again, the output is different but the problem is not fixed: $ rsync-dev big-file small-fs/ rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (146 bytes received so far) [sender] $

Re: exit status 13 in version 3.1

2009-11-12 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 09:38 -0800, Wayne Davison wrote: Yeah, that's the long-standing issue where a fatal error on the server side can cause the client side to get a socket error trying to write to the socket before it has a chance to read the error(s) from the socket. The latest git archive

RE: Does files-from work with --delete?

2009-11-12 Thread Matt McCutchen
That feature exists in the current development rsync, under the name --delete-missing-args. = OK, so I got the latest HEAD snapshot and it compiles, but it doesn't pass all the built-in tests. Currently, the tests pass for me. We would appreciate your help in figuring out why they

RE: Does files-from work with --delete?

2009-11-12 Thread Philip Pokorny
That feature exists in the current development rsync, under the name --delete-missing-args. = OK, so I got the latest HEAD snapshot and it compiles, but it doesn't pass all the built-in tests. Currently, the tests pass for me. We would appreciate your help in figuring out why they

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3392] fuzzy misbehaving if source is a file

2009-11-12 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3392 --- Comment #13 from m...@mattmccutchen.net 2009-11-12 22:16 CST --- I rediscovered this bug just now and thought I would comment on what happened so it doesn't stand as a blemish on the community. Wayne and Egmont disagreed on the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4056] Option to look for fuzzy basis files in --*-dest directories

2009-11-12 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4056 --- Comment #1 from m...@mattmccutchen.net 2009-11-12 22:16 CST --- For reference, this arose from bug 3392; I'm not advocating it myself. (I regret the noise; I think it's important to have a complete record and wish I could achieve

Re: --fuzzy search over to-be-deleted files to catch moved files and directories

2009-11-12 Thread Matt McCutchen
Attempting to address each of your questions, here and then in your other message... On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 12:17 +0100, H. Langos wrote: It will find moved files that match exactly according to the quick check in effect (size + mtime or checksum). That is basename+size+mtime or

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 3229] Don't make backup file if destination file wasn't modified

2009-11-12 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3229 m...@mattmccutchen.net changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||5583 --- Comment #3 from

Re: --fuzzy search over to-be-deleted files to catch moved files and directories

2009-11-12 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 14:32 +0100, H. Langos wrote: Unfortunately it still does not solve my problem. --detect-renamed hardlinks when it moves deleted files to its temp directory. But then it seems to copy the file to its new location. This breaks the space saving property of rsnapshot

RE: Does files-from work with --delete?

2009-11-12 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 20:11 -0800, Philip Pokorny wrote: === I uploaded the testtmp directory contents with the logs and results to: http://www.mindspring.com/~ppokorny/rsync-3.1.0dev-testtmp.tar.gz Ah. You ran the testsuite as root, and the daemon tests are not set up to cope with that. The

Daemon tests broken when running as root

2009-11-12 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 23:56 -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote: Ah. You ran the testsuite as root, and the daemon tests are not set up to cope with that. The testsuite should pass if you run it as an unprivileged user. The breakage was introduced in commit 7f367bb1b4348ba1edb863ee13f8281471785e09 ,

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6893] New: the symbolic link to the directory is gone when only some of the files are to be sync'ed

2009-11-12 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6893 Summary: the symbolic link to the directory is gone when only some of the files are to be sync'ed Product: rsync Version: 3.0.6 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 6893] the symbolic link to the directory is gone when only some of the files are to be sync'ed

2009-11-12 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6893 m...@mattmccutchen.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

Re: exit status 13 in version 3.1

2009-11-12 Thread Wayne Davison
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Matt McCutchen m...@mattmccutchen.netwrote: It looks like the implementation has the receiver hang around for a hard-coded 10 seconds, accepting data from the sender and discarding it. No, it sets a timeout of 10 seconds (i.e. 10 seconds of inactivity), which

Re: --detect-renamed --detect-moved and -b

2009-11-12 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 20:27 +0800, Thomas Gutzler wrote: I played around with the combination of rsync --detect-renamed --detect-moved and -b. You can't combine the --detect-renamed and --detect-moved options because they make use of the partial dir in incompatible ways. The last option on the

Re: exit status 13 in version 3.1

2009-11-12 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Thu, 2009-11-12 at 21:47 -0800, Wayne Davison wrote: On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 5:47 PM, Matt McCutchen m...@mattmccutchen.net wrote: It looks like the implementation has the receiver hang around for a hard-coded 10 seconds, accepting data from the sender and

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4855] skipped local filters cause segfault while deleting (-rFR --delete)

2009-11-12 Thread samba-bugs
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4855 --- Comment #4 from m...@mattmccutchen.net 2009-11-13 00:24 CST --- Is this fixed? At least I don't get the crash in 3.0.6 or the latest development rsync. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

Re: max file size

2009-11-12 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 18:20 +0100, Heinz-Josef Claes wrote: Am Montag, 9. November 2009 17:48:35 schrieb Matt McCutchen: On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 11:43 +0100, Heinz-Josef Claes wrote: does anybody know what's the maximum file size (terabytes?) when using rsync with options --checksum and /

Re: --detect-renamed --detect-moved and -b

2009-11-12 Thread Thomas Gutzler
Matt McCutchen wrote: On Wed, 2009-11-11 at 20:27 +0800, Thomas Gutzler wrote: I played around with the combination of rsync --detect-renamed --detect-moved and -b. You can't combine the --detect-renamed and --detect-moved options because they make use of the partial dir in incompatible

Re: --detect-renamed --detect-moved and -b

2009-11-12 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 14:40 +0800, Thomas Gutzler wrote: Matt McCutchen wrote: You can't combine the --detect-renamed and --detect-moved options because they make use of the partial dir in incompatible ways. The last option on the command line takes priority. (Yes, the implementation of

[SCM] The rsync repository. branch, master, updated. v3.0.3-272-gaa38114

2009-11-12 Thread Rsync CVS commit messages
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing the project The rsync repository.. The branch, master has been updated via aa381148a3b7fcf0772ea587e3d7969bd637dfcc (commit) from