On Fri, 26 May 2023, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Tue, May 16, 2023, Marc Aurèle La France wrote:
Similar to --omit-{dir,link}-times:
--omit-device-times omit device files from --times
--omit-special-times omit sockets and fifos from --times
I'm not convinced these are needed at present
Similar to --omit-{dir,link}-times:
--omit-device-times omit device files from --times
--omit-special-times omit sockets and fifos from --times
Also, fix corner case that allows --omit-dir-times to be ignored. See
unchanged_attrs() and recv_generator()'s call to try_dests_non().
Marc.
diff
Device files should be counted as devices, not symlinks.
Marc.
diff -aNpRruz -X /etc/diff.excludes rsync-3.2.7/delete.c devel-3.2.7/delete.c
--- rsync-3.2.7/delete.c2020-06-13 20:15:02.0 -0600
+++ devel-3.2.7/delete.c2020-06-13 20:15:02.0 -0600
@@ -188,7 +188,7
s/receiveing/receiving/
Marc.
diff -aNpRruz -X /etc/diff.excludes rsync-3.2.7/rsync.1.md
devel-3.2.7/rsync.1.md
--- rsync-3.2.7/rsync.1.md 2022-10-16 13:27:30.0 -0600
+++ devel-3.2.7/rsync.1.md 2022-10-16 13:27:30.0 -0600
@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ to be copied to different
I made a bash script doing this in parallel, checks how many rsyncs are
running and then starts another 'concurrent one'. My parallel sessions
are against different servers. I doubt if it would make any sense doing
multiple sessions between the same two hosts. My single rsync sessions
was
for an rsync daemon
with the "path" and "write only" options set? If so, would I need to
have an rsync daemon _running_ on the remote side if I use the rsync
--rsh=ssh /path/to/local/dir host::module syntax?
Greetings
Marc
--
----
vlan without
any hops.
But thanks for the link to the nfs-test that looks interesting!
-Original Message-
From: Dan Stromberg [mailto:drsali...@gmail.com]
Sent: donderdag 29 maart 2018 4:36
To: Marc Roos
Cc: rsync
Subject: Re: Rsync between 2 datacenters not working
If reducing
can lead to backing up /proc's contents (many
> pseudofiles), if you don't exclude it, even if you use rsync's -x
> option.
>
> On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 6:43 AM, Marc Roos via rsync
> <rsync@lists.samba.org> wrote:
>>
>> I still stuck with these errors
>>
>>
I still stuck with these errors
packet_write_wait: Connection to 192.168.10.43 port 22: Broken pipe
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (534132435 bytes received so far)
[receiver]
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(605)
[receiver=3.0.9]
rsync: connection
ct(1, [0], [], NULL, {60, 0}) = 0
(Timeout)
>From man 2 select:
int select(int nfds, fd_set *readfds, fd_set *writefds, fd_set
*exceptfds, struct timeval *timeout);
So, it is waiting for file descriptor #1 to become available with a 60
second timeout which it is hitting.
Use lsof to find
I have been having broken pipe messages for a while. I think since a
network architecture change. But I am not sure because I have not been
monitoring the errors closely before. I added this
(https://rsync.samba.org/issues.html) rsync-debug.sh script with strace
of 100. But I have no idea how
hi
i use a script to backup my homedir, that work but there are somes things i
don't really understand.
here my script
rsync -arv --delete --prune-empty-dirs --include-from=include.txt
--exclude-from=exclude /home/bob /media/usbkey
include.txt file
+ .Skype/***
+ .local/
+ .local/share/
+
will be excluding that way.
On 10/19/12 08:28, Marc wrote:
hi
i use a script to backup my homedir, that work but there are somes
things i don't really understand.
here my script
rsync -arv --delete --prune-empty-dirs --include-from=include.txt
--exclude-from=exclude /home/bob /media
Eric,
How would you know (debug) that size+time compare fails in a rsync session ?
Thanks
Marc
Le 12/06/2012 15:39, ericbamba...@discover.com a écrit :
Alan,
What is the rsync command used? If it hits a large group of files
with no differences (easy to believe across 12TB) but has
...@discover.com a écrit :
Marc,
Well you can remove the timestamp checks by adding --size-only.
If that speeds things up or removes the long pauses the timestamps were
to blame. If the behavior is the same then I'm wrong. If I'm right then
you might want to synchronize your clocks or use
Hello,
My question is regarding the interpretation of --stats output and
whether I have a performance issue or not.
Can the client/server architecture (rsync client on one machine, rsync
server on another machine) be far slowlier than a local rsync session ?
This is the ouput of an rsync
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:44:45PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Marc MERLIN m...@merlins.org wrote:
I should keep my /a - /c symlink on the destination without
--no-implied-dirs since I have /a - /c on the source too, and this is what
rsync 2 did.
See
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 09:11:57AM +0200, francis.montag...@sophia.inria.fr
wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 18:58:36 PDT Marc MERLIN wrote:
The /data symlink is clobbered and replaced by a directory. Very bad!
Any idea what's going on here and is there a magic flag to work around
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 01:09:07PM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 09:11:57AM +0200, francis.montag...@sophia.inria.fr
wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010 18:58:36 PDT Marc MERLIN wrote:
The /data symlink is clobbered and replaced by a directory. Very bad!
Any idea
!
destination:/# ls -ld /data /data/etc2
drwxrwxrwt 2 root root 4096 2010-06-15 18:53 /data
-rw-r--r-- 1 produser prod4 2010-06-15 18:53 /data/etc2
Any idea what's going on here and is there a magic flag to work around this
problem?
Thanks,
Marc
--
A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you
hi
i try to backup some dir of my hd
i had an old script... but i lost it...
i tried to create a new one, without success
include.txt
+ .kde/
+ .kde/share/
+ .kde/share/apps/
+ .kde/share/apps/kmail/***
+ .kde/share/apps/kwallet/***
- .**
exclude.txt
rpm/
mp3/
Download/
.*
my backup
this with rsync - if possible.
thanks and regards marc
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
routine and thus I don't know if there is a file on
the old server that rsync is communicating with to bypass asking for roots
password.
What is required for rsync to use the above command to pull backups from the
new server, and not want root's password entered?
Thanks
Marc
--
Please use
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 2:25 PM
To: Marc Fromm
Cc: rsync@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: asking for root password
On 23.10.2008 13:29, Marc Fromm wrote:
We are using rsync to pull backups created on our server.
The command below is run as a cronjob and it works great.
rsync
Matt McCutchen wrote:
If a file has vanished and there is also an error that affects the
correctness of the transfer, the code 23 takes precedence over the code
24. Check rsync's output for any error messages. If there are none,
Indeed that is the case. I did not realize at first
I am using rsync 2.6.9 (as currently packaged in Mandriva 2007.1)
Ever since the latest update of the package I have been getting an exit
code of 23 with the output file has vanished: {filename}.
For partial transfers due to vanished files, I (and my script) would
expect exit code 24.
(man
hi
my script to backup my home folder
BDIR=/home/$USER
EXCLUDE=exclude.txt
OPTS=-a -r -v -p -t --del --exclude-from=$EXCLUDE
--progress
BACKUPDIR=/media/dvdrecorder
rsync $OPTS $BDIR $BACKUPDIR
my exclude file
+ .kde/
+ .kde/share/
+ .kde/share/apps/
+ .kde/share/apps/kmail/***
+
Le Samedi 15 Avril 2006 11:39, Matt McCutchen a écrit :
This is a very common problem that people encounter with includes. If
you exclude .kde, rsync won't even go inside, so it won't notice
that .kde/share/apps/kmail is included.
There are three solutions. I give example filter files that
hi
i try to include and exclude file when i do a rsync
#!/bin/sh
# directory to backup
BDIR=/home/collinm/test/home
# includes file - this contains a wildcard pattern per line of files to
exclude
INCLUDE=include.txt
# excludes file - this contains a wildcard pattern per line of files to
hi
i try to do a backup of my home folder...
rsync -a -r -v --exclude-from=exclude.txt /home/test /tmp/
rsync do the backup...
when i erase folder in /home/test and do a rsync,
rsync don't erase it in /tmp/test...
any idea?
thanks
--
To unsubscribe or change options:
OK - I think this should be fixed.
Running rsync -aA on a file system that doesn't support ACLs I get:
send_acl: sys_acl_get_file(mysql, SMB_ACL_TYPE_ACCESS): Operation not supported
rsync error: some files could not be transferred (code 23) at main.c(789)
And - it aborts.
Seems to me it
Paul Slootman wrote:
On Thu 11 Aug 2005, Marc Perkel wrote:
Forgive me if this has already been asked but - shouldn't the '-a'
switch include -X and -A for ACLs and extended attributes?
I thought that -a means everything - so when everything grows -a should
grow
Wayne Davison wrote:
Given a better implementation of the --acls option (i.e. one that
doesn't complain if a source disk doesn't support ACLs), that might
make sense. Another thing to keep in mind, though, is that rsync
always passes the individual options to the remote rsync, so adding
Forgive me if this has already been asked but - shouldn't the '-a'
switch include -X and -A for ACLs and extended attributes?
I thought that -a means everything - so when everything grows -a should
grow with it.
--
To unsubscribe or change options:
to get a remote rsync to run under the strace/truss
program).
..wayne..
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http
files and
archives. This has made the --exclude option more complicated and perhaps I
could have been crafty about my naming convention but it's a bit late for me
to change my backup system so that's why I came up with the code change.
I will send you the patch file separately later today.
Marc
to time.
All in all, the 3
additional options add a mere 103 lines of new code and changes to 16 existing
lines. The files modified are: options.c, backup.c, receiver.c and one
declaration in proto.h.
To the rsync team,
if you would like to see the changes Ipropose please let me
know.
Marc
set of
brains would help.
Command used to send data from source server is:
usr/local/bin/rsync -vptr /lab/data/vendor/
rsync://destination.host.attws.com/module1
Any suggestions appreciated
Marc
Marc Bachmeier
Systems Engineer
NSS Platform Engineering
d) 425.702.3600
c) 206.618.3602
mailto
that the two rsyncs
would be working on the same destination machine at the same time.
If we don't need some sort of queue or interlock, then do we need to
run a third rsync after the overlapping pair have finished to make
sure that everything's OK?
Thanks,
Marc
--
Spitzer Space Telescope
time. These are 1 GHz machines,
roughly, and they aren't getting slowed down.
Marc Abel
Powell, Ohio
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
through a
bunch of IP tuning stuff too and my buffers and features seem fine.
I wonder what's missing here. Even if I get this working via rsh or
direct-to-rsync-server, it's still reasonable to think it would work
with ssh.
Marc Abel
Powell, Ohio
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http
Dick - that doesn't answer the man's question.
mount the other drive say as /backup
rsync -ax --delete --force / /backup/
I think that will do it.
You might want to run a list of rsync commands on a list of directories
if you are coppying a lot of files. I do the same thing where I back up
Clint Byrum wrote:
On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 07:48, Marc Perkel wrote:
Dick - that doesn't answer the man's question.
Its a valid question though (asking why not use RAID1 I mean). If we
knew that, we could better serve his rsync question. Or he might not
have realized that for things like
Paul Haas wrote:
It's a real issue, and it isn't specific to rsync. You've got a webserver
that runs well on your hardware, assuming reasonable disk caching and/or
disk I/O rates. rsync comes along and reads lots of files, thus clearing
your cache, and it walks the directory tree, doing
I also didn't know that was in there - but - I don't mind giving it the
full bandwith as long as the load factor stays low. How about a --load
switch to do the same thing based on load?
Dick Streefland wrote:
On Wednesday 2004-02-18 13:05, Edward Grace wrote:
| How about using the --bwlimit
If you aleady are doing this - then thanks. But here's a feature I'd
like to see.
Rsync often puts a lot of load on the system because of high disk
access. I'd like to see rsync become load aware and to slow itself
down under high load levels. Seems to me that it could be something
fairly
- nice doesn't apply.
jw schultz wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 03:16:32PM -0800, Marc Perkel wrote:
This is what process and i/o schedulars are for.
In most cases rsync is i/o bound. Either disk or network.
That means it spends most of its time sleeping already.
This becomes increasingly true
jw schultz wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2004 at 06:47:19PM -0800, Marc Perkel wrote:
Actually - the problem is disk IO. And the disk IO is what makes the
load levels go up. The load level is something that's readable can can
be used to have rsync slow itself down. Nice doesn't do the trick. Nice
conditions. See the GNU
General Public Licence for details.
Thanks,
Marc
--
Distributed Operations Coordinator | IO GDS System Engineer
(Operations - Marc and Pam) | (Development - Marc)
+1 818 393-7840 (voice) | +1 818 393-7786 (voice)
+1 818 393-4669 (fax) | +1
with the normal 90-second time out.
What should a normal time out be? Is 90 seconds too long? Too short?
Thanks,
Marc
All,
Sometimes when I do an rsync, it times out and leaves on orphaned
process on the remote machine. I am running rsync over ssh using
public key authentication. I
)
Or is this possible already?
Thanks,
Marc
--
A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in - A.S.R.
Microsoft is to operating systems security
what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/ | Finger
Hi,
Sorry for asking this question. Is there an rsync version for windows?
Marc
--
To unsubscribe or change options: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
I've noticed that
rsync -e ssh network:some
^C
would tend to leave cores behind on the distand machine.
Turns out rsync was trying to log a final error message... which could
not get written to stderr... which got detected by rwrite... which called
exit_cleanup... which in turn tried to write to
I can not get rsync to work when sending from my XP box to a Solaris,HPUX,or
AIX host using rsh
I am using the cygwin version of rsync, and the windows XP version of remsh.
Can anybody tell me what is happening? Any hints on what to do next?
Administrator@WOTTPAWLOWM-XP1
Howdy,
It would be nice if there was a low-volume rsync-announce mailing list
for announcements of new releases and security-related information. This
would help casual users keep current on rsync without the relatively high volume
generated on the rsync list. Just a suggestion.
--
Marc
I have been playing for some time with 2.4.7pre1. I assume some platforms
still have problems with it. Is there actually going to be a 2.4.7 at some
point in the foreseeable future ?
The command I'm using is:
/usr/local/bin/rsync -a --stats --rsh=/usr/athena/bin/rsh
--rsync-path=/usr/local/bin/rsync /content/vignette/cached-content
mvcache@www2:/opt/StoryServer/ | /bin/mailx -s Title Resolve Rsync -c
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any suggestions anyone?
TIA - Marc
Marc Ochs
Senior
was deleted
from the time the list was made to when the copy was started, or if
it is an environment issue as it is normally run by cron.
Thanks! - Marc
Marc Ochs
Senior Systems Engineer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(212) 522-9021
58 matches
Mail list logo