rsync developers if this feasible with
the current implementation and if they think it would help.
Thanks,
Peter Salameh
--
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting
Kyle Lanclos wrote:
Peter Salameh wrote:
One of the speed-limiting issues with rsync is having to send huge file
lists when mirroring large file systems, even for incremental updates
where only a small part of the file system might have changed.
Personally, I find that the sending
is to store the rsync command used to generate
the list along with the saved list, to check that the list is still valid.
I'm sure there are many rsync users out there who would benefit from this.
Still rsync is greatly appreciated.
Peter
On 10/1/07, Peter Salameh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has
I agree that rsync being stateless is a good thing. I have found it very
reliable and predictable for years. I certainly wouldn't change to unison
(which apparently is currently not maintained) just to speed up the file
list transfer.
Delta-transfer of the file list seems to make good sense for
.
Might be a good addition to rsync-3.0.
Thanks in advance.
Peter Salameh
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
