present at destination(target).
I am not going to give up I am going to try again and see...
Thanks,
lsk.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Rsync-4TB-datafiles...--t1318624.html#a4429359
Sent from the Samba - rsync forum at Nabble.com.
--
To unsubscribe or change options
+ the patch dynamic_hash.diff.
Also I am planning to install in only the sending machine...and first try
out.
Thanks for your feedback.
lsk.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Rsync-4TB-datafiles...--t1318624.html#a4180739
Sent from the Samba - rsync forum at Nabble.com
lsk wrote:
Hello Shachar...is 2.6.7 is the latest version of rsync. I could see
in the http download site it says rsync-2.6.8.tar.gz. Should I get this
version 2.6.8 + the patch dynamic_hash.diff.
Yes. In the over a month that passed since the email I sent a new
version of rsync
I started the massive transfer based on the historical timings, but now I am
facing lots of problems in the transfer...I am getting lot of errors like
this..
This is a very critical production update I have only 3 weeks time to
complete this 4 tb transfer that was taken from historical times
this).
If that is not the problem, you'll need to figure out why the 2.6.6
build didn't get compiled with large-file support for the functions
that it uses: mkstemp() (or mktemp() if your OS didn't have a good
enough mkstemp() function), open(), and lseek() all need to be O.K.
/// lsk
How to compile and make sure
Wayne,
The rsync currently running has transferred few files for eg:6gb,8gb and one
24gb files from that batch file but failed on others big files
constantly..these are only few of the big files that it was able to
transfer. Is it in any contention since all the 5 rsync streams are trying
to
lsk wrote:
But I have tried various options including --inplace,--no-whole-file etc.,
for last few weeks but all the results show me removing the destination
server oracle datafiles and after that doing an rsync -vz from source is
faster than copying(rsyncing) over the old files
Also I use the rsync version rsync version 2.6.5 protocol version 29 does
this version include this patch dynamic_hash.diff or do we need to
install it seperately.
At destination server I use rsync version 2.6.6 protocol version 29
anyhow u said that doesn't matter.
Thanks,
lsk.
--
View
trips per file.
--
Matt McCutchen
// lsk- I would like to do rsync from a disk level by using
--files-from=FILE option. But the problem is what will happen if the network
connection fails the whole rsync will fail right. One advantage that I have
if do rsync file by file is if the network
rsync gurus would you suggest which is the fastest way to trasfer this
4 TB data ? Any suggestions...would be of great help.
Thanks,
lsk.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Rsync-4TB-datafiles...--t1318624.html#a3516542
Sent from the Samba - rsync forum at Nabble.com
), and copying the 4TB to temp. files every time could become
a big timewaster. Also the -t option could be handy, not all files
change all the time IIRC.
***lsk
I can't use -t because the oracle datafiles header information are constanly
updated so it will definetely change.
But I have tried
% or so.
--
Matt McCutchen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hashproduct.metaesthetics.net/
lsk -- Matt I was doing lot of tests with the real time TTS
ransfers using rsync of oracle datafiles. Out of that what I observed was,
with the files in place and when I am doing the transfers using rsync
control file so I am desperate of trying
all options that would suffice my need to get this done in less amount of
time.
Thanks,
lsk.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Rsync-help-needed...-t1170765.html#a3215145
Sent from the Samba - rsync forum at Nabble.com
options:
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
/// lsk- Linus in my case the destination server path name and source
path name that includes SID is different so how you would build the rsync
syntax using --files
On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 11:08 -0800, lsk wrote:
I have been using the following syntax..
rsync -cvz /d01/app/testfile1.dbf tarser:/t01/app/testfile1.dbf
but I would change to the one below and test a 40 GB transfer and see the
results...
rsync -zv --no-whole-file --stats /d01/app
On Fri, 2006-02-24 at 11:08 -0800, lsk wrote:
I have been using the following syntax..
rsync -cvz /d01/app/testfile1.dbf tarser:/t01/app/testfile1.dbf
but I would change to the one below and test a 40 GB transfer and see the
results...
rsync -zv --no-whole-file --stats /d01/app
round trips per file.
Thanks Matt. I thought that might be the case.
--
//*** lsk = Could you give an example with syntax for rsync using file
option --files-rom=FILE.
Thanks,
lsk.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Rsync-help-needed...-t1170765.html#a3146482
Sent from
of datafiles and the create a target
database by replicating the source so I need the best option to RSYNC only
the changes instead of the whole 5 TB database.
Thanks,
lsk
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Rsync-help-needed...-t1170765.html#a3108487
Sent from the Samba - rsync forum
Wayne Davison-2 wrote:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 05:58:26AM -0800, lsk wrote:
2) And Matt could explain little more on what do you mean by atomicity
What he meant is that, without --inplace, rsync creates an updated file
and moves it into place, making the update atomic (i.e. none
cleaning the old files so in the
old files only the changes will be copied and new files also needs to be
rsynced.
What is the rsync command to be used ?
Thanks,
lsk.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Rsync-help-needed...-t1170765.html#a3075671
Sent from the Samba - rsync forum
Gian,
What do you mean by cleanup the datafiles on the target server? Are
you editing files on the target server?
lsk: That means I delete/rm the files from the target and then start rsync.
If the target is not 100% different from the source, yes, keep it!
Rsync will upload
21 matches
Mail list logo
