On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 03:11:59AM +0200, Rolf Grossmann wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> on Thu, 25 Apr 2002 15:52:56 -0500 Dave Dykstra wrote
> concerning "Re: 4.4BSD chflags support for rsync" something like this:
>
> > I think the --flags patch is probably f
Hi Dave,
on Thu, 25 Apr 2002 15:52:56 -0500 Dave Dykstra wrote
concerning "Re: 4.4BSD chflags support for rsync" something like this:
> I think the --flags patch is probably fine, except that that the short
> description should at least say "preserve file flags" i
lf Grossmann wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> on Fri, 8 Mar 2002 11:55:10 -0600 Dave Dykstra wrote
> concerning "Re: 4.4BSD chflags support for rsync" something like this:
>
> > New options are usually handled by just letting the remote side fail when
> > it doesn'
Hi Dave,
on Fri, 8 Mar 2002 11:55:10 -0600 Dave Dykstra wrote
concerning "Re: 4.4BSD chflags support for rsync" something like this:
> New options are usually handled by just letting the remote side fail when
> it doesn't understand the option, as you're doing. Pe
New options are usually handled by just letting the remote side fail when
it doesn't understand the option, as you're doing. Perhaps you just
shouldn't include it with -a.
At a minimum, you'd need to update the rsync.yo and rsync.1 versions of
the man page before it could be accepted.
- Dave Dy
Hi,
I've changed rsync to support the BSD change file flags. However, this
raises some compatibility problems, especially when including it with
the -a option. If the remote host does not understand the new option
for updating file flags, the user gets an error message about an
unknown option. Ho
