On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 07:18:39PM +, Andrew Gideon wrote:
The previous copy of the file has the correct/complete ACL, and the
link-dest logic sees this as different from the new copy result so
a new copy of the file - with the wrong ACL - is written.
Rsync was of the belief that a mask
On Sun, 02 Nov 2008 16:10:23 -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote:
Fixing this in a way that works with all combinations of mask-requiring
and non-mask-requiring systems will take some care. We discussed
similar issues a while ago:
http://lists.samba.org/archive/rsync/2006-October/016400.html
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 17:35 +, Andrew Gideon wrote:
On Sun, 02 Nov 2008 16:10:23 -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote:
Fixing this in a way that works with all combinations of mask-requiring
and non-mask-requiring systems will take some care. We discussed
similar issues a while ago:
On Sun, 02 Nov 2008 16:10:23 -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote:
Fixing this in a way that works with all combinations of mask-requiring
and non-mask-requiring systems will take some care.
Any thoughts on this? The code has changed significantly from when I did
my futzing around in 2.6.2, so - even
I've been using a 2.6.2 that I modified myself to get ACLs as I like.
I'm trying now to get back into the public version of rsync, but am
finding difficulties.
This one seems pretty basic. It's on a CentOS 4.5 machine with rsync rpm
rsync-3.0.4-1.el4.rf and kernel 2.6.9-55.0.2.plus.c4.
On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 19:18 +, Andrew Gideon wrote:
This one seems pretty basic. It's on a CentOS 4.5 machine with rsync rpm
rsync-3.0.4-1.el4.rf and kernel 2.6.9-55.0.2.plus.c4. After the
operation, f1 and f2 should have identical ACLs. They don't.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] t]# rsync
On Sun, 02 Nov 2008 15:33:05 -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote:
You need to pass -A to preserve ACLs. -X does not process system.*
extended attributes.
Sorry. I actually [think I] know that, but copied the wrong test.
As you'll see below, -A yields the same results:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 2008-11-02 at 20:48 +, Andrew Gideon wrote:
As you'll see below, -A yields the same results:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] t]# getfacl f1 f2
# file: f1
# owner: adm
# group: sys
user::r-x
group::r-x
mask::r-x
other::r-x
On Sun, 02 Nov 2008 16:10:23 -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote:
[...]
I
guess one could still make the argument that the ACLs should be copied
exactly.
That would be my assertion. Regardless of the reason for the mask being
present - added by the user or required by the file system - the default
