On Wed, May 16, 2001 at 05:25:03PM +1200, Wilson, Mark - MST wrote:
How do I go about registering this bug with the include file.
I don't think there's any point registering it until you have better
confirmed that that is indeed the problem. Also, if developers have no way
of reproducing the
!
- Eagles
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 05/15/2001 10:36:47
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]@SMTP
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]@SMTP
Subject:RE: FW: Problem with large include files
Classification:
How do I go about registering this bug
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 03:31:23PM +1200, Wilson, Mark - MST wrote:
...
Do you have any idea what the maximum number of files you can have in an
include file is (for the current version)?
No, I don't. It probably depends on a lot of variables.
How do you want your test on 2.3.2 done? ie LAN
-
From: Dave Dykstra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 16 May 2001 01:24
To: Wilson, Mark - MST
Cc: RSync List (E-mail)
Subject: Re: FW: Problem with large include files
On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 03:31:23PM +1200, Wilson, Mark - MST wrote:
...
Do you have any idea what the maximum number
PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 05/15/2001 10:36:47
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]@SMTP
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]@SMTP
Subject:RE: FW: Problem with large include files
Classification:
How do I go about registering this bug with the include file.
It would
* mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Data Management Security * 313-39-01744
-Original Message-
From: Wilson, Mark - MST [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2001 11:12 PM
To: 'Dave Dykstra'
Cc: RSync List (E-mail)
Subject: RE: Problem with large include files
Dave
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 03:12:27PM +1200, Wilson, Mark - MST wrote:
Dave
A couple of points:
1. I think you are telling me that if I go back to 2.3.2 my problems should
go away. Is this correct?
Hopefully, assuming you trigger the optimization (no wildcards in the
includes followed by an
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 11:13:40AM -0500, Dave Dykstra wrote:
...
As a thought, have you or any of the other developers thought of getting
rsync to operate over a number of streams or to use sliding windows to
overcome latency effects?
I don't recall that that subject has been discussed
On Fri, 11 May 2001, Dave Dykstra wrote:
The optimization bypassed the normal recursive traversal of all the
files and directly opened the included files and sent the list over.
There's an alternative to this optimization: if we could read the
source files from a file (or stdin), we could use
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 01:32:01PM -0700, Wayne Davison wrote:
On Fri, 11 May 2001, Dave Dykstra wrote:
The optimization bypassed the normal recursive traversal of all the
files and directly opened the included files and sent the list over.
There's an alternative to this optimization: if
Try rsync 2.3.2 on both ends and see what the result is.
What transport method are you using (rsh, ssh, or rsync --daemon mode)?
--daemon mode. Some tests a colleague did showed a performance advantage.
Come to think of it, I know from experience that rsync is able to keep the
TCP
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, 12 May 2001 01:43
To: Wilson, Mark - MST
Cc: RSync List (E-mail)
Subject: Re: Problem with large include files
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 11:41:41AM +1200, Wilson, Mark - MST wrote:
Hi there
I recently tried to do a transfer of a directory tree with about
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 11:41:41AM +1200, Wilson, Mark - MST wrote:
Hi there
I recently tried to do a transfer of a directory tree with about 120,000
files. I needed to select various files and used the --include-from option
to select the files I needed to transfer. The include file had
Hi there
I recently tried to do a transfer of a directory tree with about 120,000
files. I needed to select various files and used the --include-from option
to select the files I needed to transfer. The include file had 103,555
filenames in it. The problem I have is that the transfer quit after
14 matches
Mail list logo
