On 10.5.2007, at 2:16, Tom Riley wrote:
I have 2 mounts on a single computer the production mount is 100gigs
(/msgstore) and contains rough 17 million small files (email message
store), and a newly created 500g ufs file system (/mnt)
However, the curiosity comes in with my source data
On Wed, 09 May 2007 15:18:38 -0400, Tom Riley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At present time, the destination volume is 2.5 times the size of the
original volume.
Have you tried the --sparse option?
--
Bob Bagwill
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: rsync mechanics question
Tom Riley wrote:
However, the curiosity comes in with my source data taking up 86gigs
of
data on a 100g partition, and as the copy progresses the destination
drive is reporting 240 gigs of usage.
So as far as I can tell, rsync is working
Tom Riley wrote:
Hey All,
I’ve been using rsync (2.6.9) to migrate a 90g message store volume and
I’m running into some interesting results. I have two FC storage arrays
attached to a Sunfire V280R, running Solaris 8. My 100gig volume is on a
Sun StoreEdge 3510, and my new 500gig
JamesDR wrote:
Tom Riley wrote:
Hey All,
I’ve been using rsync (2.6.9) to migrate a 90g message store volume and
I’m running into some interesting results. I have two FC storage arrays
attached to a Sunfire V280R, running Solaris 8. My 100gig volume is on a
Sun StoreEdge 3510, and
On 5/9/07, JamesDR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By using --inplace (if I read that right)
you'll be xfering the entire 90GB store over the network.
Not exactly. --inplace only prevents the receiver from matching
source data using data at an earlier offset in the old destination
file (because the
On 5/9/07, Tom Riley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been using rsync (2.6.9) to migrate a 90g message store volume and I'm
running into some interesting results.
Please be more specific about what is going wrong. If you get an
error message, please send the exact text. If rsync is successful,
09, 2007 2:56 PM
To: Tom Riley
Cc: rsync@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: rsync mechanics question
On 5/9/07, Tom Riley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been using rsync (2.6.9) to migrate a 90g message store volume
and
I'm
running into some interesting results.
Please be more specific about
Tom Riley wrote:
However, the curiosity comes in with my source data taking up 86gigs of
data on a 100g partition, and as the copy progresses the destination
drive is reporting 240 gigs of usage.
So as far as I can tell, rsync is working and the data integrity seems
good, it's simply taking
